<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Kenyans Must Embrace and Support the TJRC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://africanarguments.org/2009/11/why-kenyans-must-embrace-and-support-the-tjrc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://africanarguments.org/2009/11/why-kenyans-must-embrace-and-support-the-tjrc/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 08:01:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Eichener</title>
		<link>http://africanarguments.org/2009/11/why-kenyans-must-embrace-and-support-the-tjrc/comment-page-1/#comment-20528</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Eichener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://africanarguments.org/?p=717#comment-20528</guid>
		<description>The - long overdue and far too late - resignation of Betty Murungi and the present Kenyan headlines made me revisit my earlier statement. More and more demands to disband this specific TJRC altogether are being heard now; and they are right. The academics will be the last ones to admit this, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8211; long overdue and far too late &#8211; resignation of Betty Murungi and the present Kenyan headlines made me revisit my earlier statement. More and more demands to disband this specific TJRC altogether are being heard now; and they are right. The academics will be the last ones to admit this, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiona Ngarachu</title>
		<link>http://africanarguments.org/2009/11/why-kenyans-must-embrace-and-support-the-tjrc/comment-page-1/#comment-12582</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiona Ngarachu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 12:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://africanarguments.org/?p=717#comment-12582</guid>
		<description>What choice do we have? The commission has been formed and we can debate about it ad nauseam but the fact of the matter is it will soldier on regardless of what is said about it. So then... do we simply roll over and let things continue as they have been going on for decades? Decidedly not. I greatly believe in change from within. And further that change begins in the mind. It is true that Kenyans have seen commissions come and go with little or no positive result. But we can change that is we support this commission. Though they do not realize it the people truly have the power. let them hold this commission accountable and support its work and we may truly be surprised. Call me an idealist if you will and i will answer you that i would rather laugh than cry. I will live any day of my life as an optimist rather than wallow in the inherent pessimism. Good Christians that we are we say that you reap what you sow. Therefore, let us reap hope, justice and truth and we will sow a truly united nation. Cogito ergo sum. I think therefore i am. In our very thoughts let us be as one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What choice do we have? The commission has been formed and we can debate about it ad nauseam but the fact of the matter is it will soldier on regardless of what is said about it. So then&#8230; do we simply roll over and let things continue as they have been going on for decades? Decidedly not. I greatly believe in change from within. And further that change begins in the mind. It is true that Kenyans have seen commissions come and go with little or no positive result. But we can change that is we support this commission. Though they do not realize it the people truly have the power. let them hold this commission accountable and support its work and we may truly be surprised. Call me an idealist if you will and i will answer you that i would rather laugh than cry. I will live any day of my life as an optimist rather than wallow in the inherent pessimism. Good Christians that we are we say that you reap what you sow. Therefore, let us reap hope, justice and truth and we will sow a truly united nation. Cogito ergo sum. I think therefore i am. In our very thoughts let us be as one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Eichener</title>
		<link>http://africanarguments.org/2009/11/why-kenyans-must-embrace-and-support-the-tjrc/comment-page-1/#comment-9204</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Eichener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://africanarguments.org/?p=717#comment-9204</guid>
		<description>The rebuttal can be less wordy. 

Unfortunately, the TJRC has been heavily discredited by the very stain of its birth; and this stain was not due - as Musila incorrectly alleges - to the selecton of the commissioners, but rather the fact that the main and prevalent motive for the creation of this TJRC was the exact opposite of its purported agenda. Namely, a perpetuation of impunity, and a cover-up of truth. Wananchi have understood this better than academics.

Secondly, it is true that beyond the ICC, a Special Tribunal (presently this look like a hybrid tribunal, finally freed from the dysfunctional fetters of Common Law) cannot put all suspects and all the presumptively involved through a pipeline. Kenya had the Pipeline once, during the last Emergency, and that was enough of a dire lesson. But the argument is too short, because that is a limitation of all criminal justice in general.

Thirdly, no court, no trials and no judicial processes can replace or subtitute diligent historical research, nor the duties and chances of a TJRC. And indeed, the legal venue must not and shall not be seen as a contrary option. Rather, a TJRC would be a much-needed complement to the inborn shortcomings and limitations of the law (although not this specific one).

Fourthly, a &quot;nation&quot; did not call for this TJRC, as Musila alleges. Who called, was a small group of intellectuals, some self-serving and busybodish, ploughing their little demarcated fields and waiting to harvest at last, and some others altruistic and idealist. The nation - Wanjiku - still feels alienated and suspicious. The nation has seen many commissions, and has seen many of them unearth parts and morsels of truth; but in not a single case, has the nation seen credible action and change spring from these efforts.

Fifthly, it is indeed a shame that the reasonable call for truth, justice and reconciliation has become converted into the snorting trumpet sound of impunity. But that is the Kenyan establishment. What is left now as an option, is to bury this mishapen and discredited changeling for good, and to conceive, carry, labour and give birth anew.  Let us hope that the womb is still fertile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rebuttal can be less wordy. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, the TJRC has been heavily discredited by the very stain of its birth; and this stain was not due &#8211; as Musila incorrectly alleges &#8211; to the selecton of the commissioners, but rather the fact that the main and prevalent motive for the creation of this TJRC was the exact opposite of its purported agenda. Namely, a perpetuation of impunity, and a cover-up of truth. Wananchi have understood this better than academics.</p>
<p>Secondly, it is true that beyond the ICC, a Special Tribunal (presently this look like a hybrid tribunal, finally freed from the dysfunctional fetters of Common Law) cannot put all suspects and all the presumptively involved through a pipeline. Kenya had the Pipeline once, during the last Emergency, and that was enough of a dire lesson. But the argument is too short, because that is a limitation of all criminal justice in general.</p>
<p>Thirdly, no court, no trials and no judicial processes can replace or subtitute diligent historical research, nor the duties and chances of a TJRC. And indeed, the legal venue must not and shall not be seen as a contrary option. Rather, a TJRC would be a much-needed complement to the inborn shortcomings and limitations of the law (although not this specific one).</p>
<p>Fourthly, a &#8220;nation&#8221; did not call for this TJRC, as Musila alleges. Who called, was a small group of intellectuals, some self-serving and busybodish, ploughing their little demarcated fields and waiting to harvest at last, and some others altruistic and idealist. The nation &#8211; Wanjiku &#8211; still feels alienated and suspicious. The nation has seen many commissions, and has seen many of them unearth parts and morsels of truth; but in not a single case, has the nation seen credible action and change spring from these efforts.</p>
<p>Fifthly, it is indeed a shame that the reasonable call for truth, justice and reconciliation has become converted into the snorting trumpet sound of impunity. But that is the Kenyan establishment. What is left now as an option, is to bury this mishapen and discredited changeling for good, and to conceive, carry, labour and give birth anew.  Let us hope that the womb is still fertile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
