Boko Haram – more complicated than you think – By Richard Dowden

Mobilisation of the Nigerian army against Boko Haram provides both a challenge and an opportunity...

Nothing in Nigeria is what it seems. Beneath a confusing, disorderly surface lie networks of association and obligation of which outsiders, and sometimes insiders, are unaware. Money is chopped (stolen), people paid off, budgets looted and shared. Power, political and financial, is never transparent. In other nation states a citizen’s obligations to the state or employer, trump friendship or family connections. In Nigeria the state and institutions often rank far lower than personal affiliations. Outsiders are often shocked at the way public institutions are looted and distributed to buy personal loyalty or simply given to family and friends. The state is not a revered institution serving all citizens. It is a treasure house of power and money to be captured and looted.

This, rather than Islamic fundamentalism, is the context of the tragic deaths of Chris McManus and Franco Lamolinara in a bungled rescue bid in Sokoto on Thursday. A group calling itself Al-Qa’ida in the Land Beyond the Sahel claimed responsibility and it is said to be part of Boko Haram. Officials say that the demands they had made for the release of the hostages were confused.

What do we know about Boko Haram? It means Western education (books) is sinful and it is a nickname for Jama’atu Ahlis Sunna Lidda’awati Wal-Jihad which means The Group Committed to Propagating the Prophet’s Teachings and Jihad. So far this fits in with a tradition of Islamic fundamentalist movements that have emerged in northern Nigeria over the past two centuries. Some but not all have been violent.

Boko Haram was a peaceful, if fundamentalist, Islamic movement from its beginnings in 2002 until its leader, Mohamed Yusuf, was brutally tortured to death by the police in 2009. The torture was captured on film by the police and gave Boko Haram a terrific boost. It then demanded an Islamist state in Northern Nigeria (note – not the whole of Nigeria) and started attacking Christian churches and police stations. The attacks were crude, using home made bombs. Last year Boko Haram was transformed. The bombings of the Police and UN headquarters in Abuja, the capital, which killed more than 100 people were suicide bombings – a phenomenon previously unknown in Nigeria. The culture of Nigeria is mercenary but you cannot pay people to kill themselves. This was real commitment or brainwashing. Secondly, the bombers were using sophisticated explosive devices and thirdly the attacks were on key government institutions. At its core Boko Haram does seem to have very serious intent, it is organised and well-funded and some of its operatives are well trained in techniques developed in Afghanistan and Iraq.

However, in the months following the UN bombing, all sorts of attacks were claimed by Boko Haram. Many of them did not seem to fit its ideology and in November last year the State Security Service issued a statement saying that it had identified four criminal syndicates which were issuing statements or threats in the name of Boko Haram. There have been some bizarre incidents – such as the bombing of a church claimed apparently by Boko Haram which turned out to have been perpetrated by a disaffected member. At least one northern state governor has paid Boko Haram to attack his rivals. A former senior Nigerian government official I spoke with yesterday said that there is a strong suspicion that if you want to settle old scores or kill rivals in Northern Nigeria these days, now is the time to do it. You can always claim it in the name of Boko Haram. That adds real fear to your threats and demands.

And it is not just Boko Haram which benefits from the global fear of terrorism.  My friend went on to point out that a quarter of Nigeria’s budget of almost $30 billion this year will be spent on the military and security services. The service chiefs will now have to find – or create something – to justify that and keep it flowing.

Many of the northern highways are studded with police road blocks which have an excuse and official blessing to engage in a bit of highway robbery. It is very difficult to get through any Nigerian roadblock without ‘dashing’ – paying – the police. But the police are small beer compared to the army. This is the biggest chance the generals have had to ‘chop’ since military rule ended in 1999. Unless they have changed completely, the senior officers will not allow the justification for this level of spending to diminish or die. They now have a major stake in Nigeria’s ‘war on terror’.

This is also the case for northern Nigerian politicians who have been funding and possibly even directing Boko Haram. They saw how the politicians of the Niger Delta manipulated the gangs which were attacking oil installations and demanding that oil companies did more for the local communities. The end result was that political power shifted to the Delta with a Delta man as president.  If the Delta could do that, so could the north, which has finally lost political power in Nigeria after almost 50 years.

And the ordinary people of Nigeria? 150 million of them, more than 60% under 25 years old. 90% of them live on less than $2 a day. Until they see some hope of a future , their loyalty to the state, law, order and stability is easily undermined.

As Prime Minister David Cameron is discovering, dealing with terrorism in Nigeria is not straightforward.

Richard Dowden is Director of the Royal African Society.

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

7 thoughts on “Boko Haram – more complicated than you think – By Richard Dowden

  1. Richard Dowden’s crisp, fascinating piece on Bokom Haram is characteristic of his deep insights into Nigeria’s condition, which reverberates in his previous writing and debates on Nigeria. His Africa: Altered States, Ordinary Miracles (2009) that the Nigerian great novelist, Chinua Achebe, wrote its preface, is one of the best books I have read about Nigeria in recent tine. Dowden’s description about the goings-on in Nigeria as well as other African nations is breathtakingly penetrating, his analysis is photographic and his knowledge of political and leadership malaise in Africa is surreal!

    This is what Richard Dowden has done in this piece on Boko Haram. His revelation should bring to many people new knowledge regarding Boko Harm, which some folks including me thought was prima facie a violent and militarist group, a disgruntled, rag-tag army for the perpetuation of violence and Islamist ethos. Although Boko Haram has been radicalised (should we say) into agenda-seeking group with political, ideological and religious colouration, this piece offers a terse beginning of the group, reason for radicalisation, its part in war and terrorism and sustaining peace in Nigeria given the pressures of Niger delta conundrum, widespread political strife, poverty, institutional collapse, brazen leadership and other reverses that characterise a failing (frail or fragile) nation!

    More than this, the history of Boko Haram spins the yarn of Lasswell’s ”The Garrison State” hypothesis, when might is the tastiest dish on the menu of finding ways to circumvent domination and brute force.

  2. There is absolutely nothing in this analysis that is either new or revealing.

    The key question is what are we to do about it?

    That remains unanswered.

  3. Pingback: Africa | Pearltrees

  4. Pingback: All Global Jihadists Come From Somewhere «

  5. Pingback: NigeriansTalk – Weekly Ten: “Their Faces Were Swollen”

  6. How many Nigerians are there? Nobody knows, not even Richard Dowden. The number of Nigerians is usually a figment of the writer’s imagination. Dowden called Nigerians “mercenaries,” that is an insult. Nigerians are less mercenary than UK, US, and all the other advanced terror nations of the West. The history of terrorism in Nigeria can be dated back to the various so-called punitive expenditions carried out by Britain on Nigerian communities starting 1851 through 1920. According to Asiegbu, British forces attacked, looted and burned down Nigerian cities, towns and villages. This was the origin of modern impoverishment of Nigerians.

    Let no one blame our present troubles on hapless leadership or corruption. The West could have wished for no better outcome. Has not the West been educating our elites (military, academic, and political), what evaluative judgement can be passed on the outcomes? Boko Haram!

  7. Pingback: The Week on Sunday (weekly)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


nine − = 2

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>