From the standpoint of constitutional law, the handing over of the Waki envelope to the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) represents the ceding of judicial autonomy of the state to an ‘exceptional court’. The establishment of a domestic special tribunal which supplants the supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court and strips the president and attorney general of constitutional powers and immunities has a similar effect. Continue reading →

Read the rest of Leashing Kenya’s Dogs of War: A Theoretical Assessment »

Human Rights Reporting as the First Draft of the Indictment Journalism has been described as the “first draft of history.” By the same token, the human rights report is the “first draft of the indictment.” The genre of the human

Read the rest of Human Rights Reporting on Darfur: A Genre that Redefines Tragedy (3) »

The Kenyan Cabinet recently resolved to put forward the Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission (TJRC) as a way to address the post-election violence. In this first of three essays looking at some of the misconceptions in the transitional justice debate in Kenya (the next two contributions will consider domestic and international prosecutions respectively), I evaluate whether the establishment of the TJRC makes the Kenyan situation inadmissible before the International Criminal Court (ICC). Continue reading →

Read the rest of Misconceptions I – The ICC and the Truth Justice and Reconciliation Commission (TJRC) »

At ‘African Arguments’ there is a vigorous debate on international justice ongoing. The spark for the debate was a series of postings on justice and accountability in Kenya, but the issues range far wider. Earlier today, Chidi Odinkalu posted an

Read the rest of International Justice Debate at “African Arguments” »

At the conclusion of its Summit in Sirte, Libya, on July 1, 2009, the Assembly of Heads of State and Governments of the African Union (AU) decided that “AU Member States shall not cooperate … in the arrest and surrender of President Omar El Bashir of The Sudan.” In a press release issued two weeks later, on July 14, the organisation explained that this decision “bears testimony to the glaring reality that the situation in Darfur is too serious and complex an issue to be resolved without recourse to an harmonised approach to justice and peace, neither of which should be pursued at the expense of the other.” Continue reading →

Read the rest of Saving international justice in Africa »

Kenyans are very suspicious of the rare unity between the Cabinet and the Parliament as they jointly dismiss calls for the prosecution of the perpetrators of post-election violence atrocities. This unscrupulous behaviour is not coincidental, but a well crafted strategy: the Cabinet and Parliament are distorting facts on the requirements for a local tribunal, in order to escape accountability. Politicians are satisfied that they are now sharing the spoils and that it is business as usual. They prefer to push the issues that contributed to the crisis under the carpet in order to focus on efforts to capture power in 2012. While we commend the Kenyan government for renewing efforts to enact the Special Tribunal to try those responsible for the 2007 election violence, we believe that nothing short of momentous symbolic shock therapy to the political elite would incentivize formation of an effective, independent and impartial Tribunal locally. Here, we believe the International Criminal Court (ICC) continues to have a major role. Continue reading →

Read the rest of Special Tribunal Enactment: Why Cabinet, MPs, are Misleading Kenyans »

Pacification “NO PEACE WITHOUT JUSTICE” The second main argument used in support of the International Criminal Court is that there can be “no peace without justice.” This argument is summed up perfectly in this 6 March 2009 editorial in Le

Read the rest of Humanitarian aid and the International Criminal Court: Grounds for divorce (2) »

Introduction Officially, the thirteen NGOs expelled from Sudan after an international arrest warrant was issued against Sudanese president Omar al-Bashir were being punished for their “violations to the laws of the humanitarian work” in cooperating with the “so-called International Criminal

Read the rest of Humanitarian aid and the International Criminal Court: Grounds for divorce (1) »

The following letter from a senior ICC official has been published in World Affairs in response to the article by Julie Flint and Alex de Waal on the Prosecutor. Luis Moreno Ocampo Dear Sir: Alex de Waal advance against Luis

Read the rest of Response to ‘A Waste of Hope’ »

On 9 July 2009, Kofi Annan the former chief mediator in the aftermath of Kenya’s post-electoral violence, transferred an undisclosed list of senior politicians to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Luis Moreno-Ocampo. These politicians are alleged to have committed crimes against humanity during the post-electoral violence between December 2007 and February 2008. What prompted Annan’s actions? Continue reading →

Read the rest of The Spectre of Impunity and the Politics of the Special Tribunal in Kenya »