African Arguments

Top Menu

  • About Us
  • Submit
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Swaziland
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • Living in Translation
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Africa Insiders
  • Donate
  • About Us
  • Submit
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed

logo

Header Banner

African Arguments

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Swaziland
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • Living in Translation
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Africa Insiders
  • Donate
Politics

Mali: military intervention is necessary, inevitable but (until now) impossible – By Gregory Mann

By African Arguments
October 17, 2012
1875
14
Share:

Dioncounda Traore - Maili's interim President - has asked ECOWAS for military assistance in northern Mali.

Nobody seems to know what to do about Mali. In late September, the world’s biggest tradeshow in global governance – the UN General Assembly – wound down having made no real decisions on a course of action there. After forceful speeches by Malian Prime Minister Cheikh Modibo Diarra, Senegalese President Macky Sall and his French counterpart Francois Hollande, the Security Council determined to play kick-the-can with the powderkeg in the Malian Sahara until all the key diplomatic players were lined up. On Friday, however, the Council finally made a tentative move when (in a unanimous vote) it took a step towards authorizing an ECOWAS intervention.

What was on the table? After months of dispute, interim President Dioncounda Traore asked ECOWAS for military assistance in northern Mali, where a coalition of violent Salafists, drug-runners and al Qaeda-allied hostage-takers have taken hold of some two-thirds of the national territory.

ECOWAS has been chewing on this problem for months now, but needs a green light from the UN before taking any action. Still, the Council sent them back to the woodshed to come up with a precise and viable plan for coordination with the Malian army. All signs are that at least two other major pieces remain to be worked out: financing and the potential role of non-African powers like France and the United States, who already have advisors consulting with ECOWAS general staff. Both reject “˜boots on the ground,’ but also know that their help will be needed, at least behind the scenes.

Leaving the military and logistical complexities aside, some of the diplomatic problems are devilish. For better or worse, France has been most aggressive in tackling those. For instance, Algeria and Mauritania are not in ECOWAS, but there can be no solution without them. France has already worked closely with Nouakchott, a key regional ally, and as it happens, Mauritanian President Mohamed Ould Abdelaziz made an emergency trip to France this weekend after taking a bullet in obscure circumstances.

At the same time, French Interior Minister Manuel Valls visited Algiers, meeting with President Abdelaziz Bouteflika, who apparently held firm to the line that any intervention must be African, and that dialogue must be privileged first. Meanwhile, Hollande tried to keep attention on the Sahelian drama both in his heavily publicized speech in Dakar- a rebuttal to Nicolas Sarkozy’s infamous discourse of 2007- and during the Francophonie conference in Kinshasa.

All this earned Paris a threat from Timbuktu, in the form of a video statement from a middle-aged French jihadi with a strong provincial accent who proclaimed his loyalty to AQMI. His statement only raised the stakes, since nothing gets the attention of anti-terrorism experts like jihadis with European passports. All in all, it was a busy week for French Africa policy, one that saw a full court press on the Malian crisis.

It has been clear for weeks – if not months – that outside military intervention in Mali was necessary, inevitable and impossible.

Necessary: the current situation is an extremely dangerous one for the hundreds of thousands of civilians chased from the territory since the beginning of the year and many who remain there, but also for Mali’s neighbours.

Inevitable: those neighbours – especially Niger, Nigeria, and Mauritania – are directly threatened by the jihadists. No one in the neighborhood – except possibly Algeria – can tolerate the current situation for long. Time is not on their side.

Impossible: Malians could not agree on it, and no one part of the unstable governing coalition has been strong enough to impose its views on the others. Over the last few weeks, however, the impossible has become possible.

Although Prime Minister Diarra argued in New York that delay is deadly, the junta to whom he was once thought to be beholden has steadfastly opposed the idea of West African troops being deployed in the country, notably in Bamako. Along with the junta (which still controls the army), many in “˜the intelligentsia’, the political class, and a lot of the general populace vehemently reject the idea of outside intervention. Despite all evidence being to the contrary, the army insists that it can fix the problem itself.

ECOWAS’s long blockade of Malian arms shipments in neighboring ports allowed the junta to blame its neighbors for the army’s inaction and further poisoned perceptions of the regional body in Mali. Yet the army’s plan to go it alone is alarming, since part of its solution is to arm ethnic militias along the Niger River.

Over the past few weeks, the political logjam between those in Mali who wanted outside help and those who refused it had begun to break under mounting pressure from foreign powers, displaced citizens of the North and their leaders in Bamako, organized as COREN. Even as the Security Council was meeting, thousands marched in the Malian capital to demand intervention. However, as Bamako took a step forward, American figures – from Africom commander General Carter Ham to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and point man for Africa, Assistant Secretary Johnnie Carson – publicly urged it to take two steps back, insisting that the US wanted to see elections before action in the North.

In an open letter published in Bamako’s Infomatin, US ambassador Mary Beth Leonard presented a more nuanced view of American policy, but she fell back on the most comfortable of clichés about African solidarity when arguing that elections had to be held before the Northern problem could be tackled. Recent statements from the embassy have doubled down on that idea, calling for an elected government to be installed by April 2013. If this position is taken in earnest, it is either dangerously naí¯ve or ill informed. The “˜hair of the dog’ approach – that the solution to political instability is more instability – might sound good in Foggy Bottom, but it rings hollow in Timbuktu.

Listen to Alhaji Baba Haí¯dara – a deputy from the Saharan city – interviewed by French radio, or the COREN representatives gathered in Bamako, as they plead for some kind of salvation. They know very well that with the country split in two and hundreds of thousands of people displaced, elections might do as much to dis-enfranchise the North as Tuareg separatists did when they destroyed electoral roles on taking Gao. For people from Northern Mali, the question is not abstract: how would elections help them get back home? We in turn might ask why anyone would want to reduce the thin possibility of cooperation to the zero-sum game of electoral competition.

Here’s one reason: U.S. law sharply restricts aid to non-“democratic” governments. In other words, State’s interest is institutional, and American diplomats feel their margin for maneuver reduced along with their budgets.

All this leaves the key question unanswered: is military intervention the right way to go? That’s a question for another essay, but it’s hard to imagine a solution to this conflict that does not involve at least the real and credible threat of military force. Whether that threat will materialize should be much clearer after October 19th, when the major players will meet again – this time in Bamako. At that point they will have less than six weeks left to respond to the Security Council’s request.

Will they kick the can again, or kick-start a campaign?

Gregory Mann lectures African history at Columbia University.

Previous Article

Mo Ibrahim Index and Governance Prize: time ...

Next Article

Sudan and South Sudan: Reviewing the 2012 ...

mm

African Arguments

Related articles More from author

  • Politics

    South Africa: A war on media freedoms?

    November 23, 2010
    By websolve
  • Politics

    Bringing Eritrea ‘in from the cold’ needs real policy changes by Eritrea’s government – By the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, ...

    January 27, 2014
    By African Arguments
  • Politics

    South Sudan at war: political failures, public expectations and how to bring peace – Peter Biar Ajak

    December 15, 2014
    By African Arguments
  • Politics

    Central Africa’s Sovereign Issues: Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe – by Nick Wright

    August 5, 2011
    By Magnus Taylor
  • Politics

    Indicting a Head of State is a Political Act

    July 10, 2008
    By Stephen Ellis
  • PoliticsSociety

    How African feminism changed the world

    March 8, 2017
    By Aili Mari Tripp

14 comments

  1. Peter Tinti 17 October, 2012 at 12:37

    The “Necessary, Inevitable But (Until Now) Impossible” framing is very much in step with the discourse here in Bamako. As an aside, I get the sense that the US position on elections is less an effort to pump the breaks on preparations for military intervention, so much as an attempt to make sure critical governance questions in Bamako remain part of the conversation. This is a legitimate concern, as plenty of actors are paying lip-service to the governance issues in Bamako, but few are actually devoting any time or energy toward it.

    That said, your third paragraph from the end nicely captures local attitudes toward this approach, and I completely agree with your description of its limits and possible dangers. Very nice piece.

  2. Weighing Foreign Intervention in Mali | News from around the world 18 October, 2012 at 19:35

    […] So is an intervention a good idea? I called up my old friend Gregory Mann, one of just a handful of American experts on Mali based at Columbia University, and asked him to share a few thoughts on the looming intervention and whether it’s a good idea. For a deeper look at the situation, check out Greg’s analysis over at African Arguments.  […]

  3. Weighing Foreign Intervention in Mali | WORLD WIDE NEWS WATCH 19 October, 2012 at 04:24

    […] a good idea. For a deeper look at the situation, check out Greg’s analysis over at African Arguments.  What’s the goal of any potential intervention in […]

  4. Leaders mull Mali military option | Webs Poker 19 October, 2012 at 11:43

    […] “All signs are that at least two other major pieces remain to be worked out: financing and the potential role of non-African powers like France and the United States,” said Gregory Mann, an associate professor at Columbia University and a contributing analyst for the African Arguments website. […]

  5. News | Ripple's Web » Leaders mull Mali military option 19 October, 2012 at 12:45

    […] “All signs are that at least two other major pieces remain to be worked out: financing and the potential role of non-African powers like France and the United States,” said Gregory Mann, an associate professor at Columbia University and a contributing analyst for the African Arguments website. […]

  6. This and that | Ripple's Web » Leaders mull Mali military option 19 October, 2012 at 12:49

    […] “All signs are that at least two other major pieces remain to be worked out: financing and the potential role of non-African powers like France and the United States,” said Gregory Mann, an associate professor at Columbia University and a contributing analyst for the African Arguments website. […]

  7. Leaders mull Mali military option – شبكة النيل الإخبارية 19 October, 2012 at 13:01

    […] “All signs are that during slightest dual other vital pieces sojourn to be worked out: financing and a intensity purpose of non-African powers like France and a United States,” pronounced Gregory Mann, an associate highbrow during Columbia University and a contributing researcher for a African Arguments website. […]

  8. U.N., West African officials address Mali crisis – شبكة النيل الإخبارية 19 October, 2012 at 13:04

    […] “All signs are that during slightest dual other vital pieces sojourn to be worked out: financing and a intensity purpose of non-African powers like France and a United States,” pronounced Gregory Mann, an associate highbrow during Columbia University and a contributing researcher for a African Arguments website. […]

  9. Ripley's Blog | Ripple's Web » Leaders mull Mali military option 19 October, 2012 at 13:17

    […] “All signs are that at least two other major pieces remain to be worked out: financing and the potential role of non-African powers like France and the United States,” said Gregory Mann, an associate professor at Columbia University and a contributing analyst for the African Arguments website. […]

  10. Leaders mull Mali military option | Rene Kubitza News 19 October, 2012 at 13:20

    […] “All signs are that at least two other major pieces remain to be worked out: financing and the potential role of non-African powers like France and the United States,” said Gregory Mann, an associate professor at Columbia University and a contributing analyst for the African Arguments website. […]

  11. News | Ripple's Web » U.N., West African officials address Mali crisis 19 October, 2012 at 18:41

    […] “All signs are that at least two other major pieces remain to be worked out: financing and the potential role of non-African powers like France and the United States,” said Gregory Mann, an associate professor at Columbia University and a contributing analyst for the African Arguments website. […]

  12. Weighing Foreign Intervention in Mali | . 20 October, 2012 at 00:54

    […] So is an intervention a good idea? I called up my old friend Gregory Mann, one of just a handful of American experts on Mali based at Columbia University, and asked him to share a few thoughts on the looming intervention and whether it’s a good idea. For a deeper look at the situation, check out Greg’s analysis over at African Arguments.  […]

  13. Mali: “Must Reads” (Part II) | peter tinti 24 October, 2012 at 02:53

    […] Mann, “Mali: Military Intervention Is Necessary, Inevitable and (Until Now) Impossible” African Arguments, 17 October […]

  14. Death Knell for al-Qaeda « 14 January, 2013 at 12:06

    […] The Security Council, unanimous across its many different state ideologies, authorized military action. The most progressive nearly communist governments and institutions also recognized the need for military action. […]

Leave a reply Cancel reply

  • Politics

    Congo: The hunt for Bosco – Kabila turns on his friends – By William Townsend

  • Politics

    AfricaFocus Bulletin- Sudan: New Violence, Uncertain Future

  • DR Congo's President Joseph Kabila
    Congo-KinshasaPolitics

    Don’t look away now: DR Congo is at greatest risk than for years

The Africa Insiders Newsletter

Get the free edition of our exclusive look at this week’s most important developments on the continent.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!

Interactive Elections Map

Keep up to date with all the African elections.

Find us on Facebook

Follow us on twitter

  • 66547
    Followers

Most Read

  • Somalia elections: At President Farmaajo's inauguration in 2017. Credit: AMISOM/ Ilyas Ahmed
    Somalia: President Farmaajo’s stacks the deck to secure a second term
  • In tackling mental health issues, the rest of Africa and the world can learn a lot from initiatives such as the Friendship Bench in Zimbabwe. Credit: Friendship Bench Project- Zimbabwe.
    Mental health in Africa: The need for a new approach
  • Jawar Mohammed meeting with supporters in October 2019. Credit: Jawar Mohammed.
    Ethiopia must stop hate speech, not free speech
  • What could replace Ethiopia's system of ethnic federalism?
    Ethiopia: Beyond ethnic federalism
  • Child sexual exploitation is on the rise. When will governments act?

About

African Arguments is a pan-African platform for news analysis, comment and opinion. We seek to analyse issues facing the continent, investigate the stories that matter, and amplify a diversity of voices.

Our content is published on a Creative Commons license.

Get in touch

editor@africanarguments.org

Brought to you by


  • Cookies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • en English
    am Amharicar Arabicny Chichewazh-CN Chinese (Simplified)en Englishfr Frenchde Germanha Hausait Italianpt Portuguesest Sesothosn Shonaes Spanishsu Sudanesesw Swahilixh Xhosayo Yorubazu Zulu
© Copyright African Arguments 2018
By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
en English
am Amharicar Arabicny Chichewazh-CN Chinese (Simplified)en Englishfr Frenchde Germanha Hausait Italianpt Portuguesest Sesothosn Shonaes Spanishsu Sudanesesw Swahilixh Xhosayo Yorubazu Zulu