Did NGOs Pass Information to the ICC?
Alex,
I just posted a piece on whether NGOs passed information to the ICC, which is on this link.
In a recent piece in the Christian Science Monitor, you are reported as saying that Ocampo himself has indicated that much of his information came from NGOs. A number of people I know who work for operational NGOs have disputed that allegation “” I’ve looked for any public statements by Ocampo admitting that he received information from NGOs operating in Darfur, but haven’t found any.
If you have know of any particular statements, or have a link, I’d love to see it.
All the best,
Michael Kleinman
English
Amharic
Arabic
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
French
German
Hausa
Italian
Portuguese
Sesotho
Shona
Spanish
Swahili
Xhosa
Yoruba
Zulu
Dear Michael,
I was flattered to see that the Christian Science Monitor identified me as a Sudanese. I think the editorial process may also have truncated my remarks or placed them out of context.
In the early days of his investigations, Prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo commented that he obtained information from the reports of human rights NGOs. Last December he also implied that Sudanese human rights activists were among his witnesses. But if he has ever said that he obtained evidence from international humanitarian NGOs working in the field in Darfur, I am not aware of it. To the contrary, I know that offered to issue a public statement that he was not cooperating with the NGOs. In retrospect, it might have been better if he had done so (though I doubt if it would have assuaged the suspicions of the Sudanese security services). And in the debate leading up to the arrest warrant, it was the advocacy NGOs and not the humanitarians who argued publicly against an Article 16 deferral by the Security Council.
The Sudan Government likes to conflate different types of NGOs. And indeed at times the mandates of humanitarian and advocacy agencies have become blurred. While I have at times argued strongly in favour of treating starvation as a criminal act, or famine as an act of political culpability, I have also argued (in The Lancet, last November) that it would be impossible for operational NGOs to square their immediate humanitarian obligations with doing the job of criminal investigations, and argued that they should leave justice for others, later.
In the publicity around the expulsion of the international NGOs, few have paid attention to the suppression of Sudanese NGOs and the security clampdown on Sudanese civil society, which is to my mind at least as worrying.
Alex
Alex,
Many thanks for the clarification,
Michael
On March 8th, 2009, a spokesman for the SLA/M Abdel Wahid Office in Israel, Issa Ibrahim Suleiman, published a statement,on sudaneseonline, Arabic Page,thanking and commending the NGOs in the camps for their services, including the information and evidence they collected and which helped in the case before the ICC. See sudaneseonline.com, 8th March 2009.
How can one read this? If this information was not intended for the ICC. So far the ICC did not deny what the statement of the SLA/M Office in Israel said
Dear Michael, Alex,
This is what the ICC has to say about the role of NGOs…
http://www.iccnow.org/?mod=roleofngos
Kind regards
Nanne
There is also the article ofChristophe Fournier( international Herald Tribune 28/29 March 09)in which he confirms that the ICC prosecutor has indeedsaid in 05 that he would count on cooperation from NGOs and others.Some NGOs, according to the writer,calimed they could be an important sourse of information. Dr Fournier is president of the Council of Doctors Without Borders.He also unveils other aspects of L.M.Ocampo’s “economy with the truth.”