African Arguments

Top Menu

  • About Us
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
    • Climate crisis
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • #EndSARS
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Podcast
    • Into Africa Podcast
    • Africa Science Focus Podcast
    • Think African Podcast
  • Debating Ideas
  • About Us
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

logo

Header Banner

African Arguments

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
    • Climate crisis
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • #EndSARS
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Podcast
    • Into Africa Podcast
    • Africa Science Focus Podcast
    • Think African Podcast
  • Debating Ideas
Politics

Good Enough Report on Chad

By Alex de Waal
July 31, 2009
2123
0
Share:

There is a good “˜Enough’ report on Chad published this week, identifying the absence of any political process in Chad save the power calculations of Idris Déby as the weakest link in the Darfur peace process.

It is widely recognized that there cannot be peace in Darfur without peace between Sudan and Chad, and nor can there be a viable settlement in Chad while war continues in Darfur. At first glance there is symmetry to the Chad-Sudan proxy war: each government is backing the military opposition of the other. Underneath it is more complicated.

While Sudan possesses viable (if troubled) processes which are grappling with its national political challenges, there is nothing comparable in Chad. The NCP is an organized party with a constituency and a substantive agenda””whether one agrees with it is a different question. The Chadian MPS is a patronage machine which has no constituency beyond the Presidential circle and no program other than staying in power. The Sudanese state has institutions, albeit weak and politicized ones. Chad has no state worthy of the name. Stabilization of the Sudanese Government of National Unity is a worthwhile goal in itself, as it will enable CPA implementation to proceed. Chad has no civil political process and the president has no succession plans. Stabilizing Déby in power can only buy time. There are two major scenarios: either Déby leaves the scene (through death or putsch) or he is forced by stronger powers (such as a combination of France, Libya and the U.S.) to broaden his power base.

The asymmetry is also present in the relationship of each government to its sponsored insurgent. For Sudan, backing the Chadian rebels is simply a matter of security against an external threat. But the N’djamena-JEM relationship is not only sponsorship of a foreign insurgent, but also a domestic political-military relationship that is fundamental to Déby’s survival. While Khartoum can stand down the Chadian forces based in Darfur, Déby cannot instruct JEM to remain on the defensive and still less can he disarm the movement.

Control of state power in Chad is all-or-nothing and is intimately and intricately linked to the political position of the Zaghawa, who are a small minority with disproportionate power and wealth. If the Zaghawa have no access state power, either in N’djamena or Khartoum, their entire collective standing will be imperiled. Déby and JEM leader Khalil Ibrahim have locked themselves into a high-stakes gamble in which each requires the other but neither can control the other.

It’s unfortunate that Chadian politics is still presented as a sideshow to Darfur. Chad is an important enough country in its own right.

Previous Article

Kenya ‘s Accountability Debate Unfolds in a ...

Next Article

Abyei Beyond the Arbitration Decision

mm

Alex de Waal

Alex de Waal is Research Professor and Executive Director of the World Peace Foundation at The Fletcher School, Tufts University. He was the founding editor of the African Arguments book series. He is the author of The Real Politics of the Horn of Africa: Money, War and the Business of Power.

0 comments

  1. Abd al-Wahab Abdalla 1 August, 2009 at 22:41

    After reading your write-up, I was disappointed. I found the report to be “good enough” but not as good as your posting implied. It was not in-depth. Perhaps you should have entitled it “Fair Enough” as it was balanced. Especially the recommendations are pro forma and of no value. Had the recommendations been honest to the substance of the report then “Enough” would have found itself making recommendations which contradicted its Darfur campaign which is premised on the guilt of Khartoum for everything that goes wrong in Darfur and Chad.

    What it reveals is the first stages of the same contradiction which beset ICG and which in due course gave birth to “Enough” as a breakaway group, which is the phenomenon of excellent analysis alongside prepackaged recommendations which bear increasingly less and less relationship to the analysis. This, one expects, will be the fate of “Enough.” Because of its rates of pay and its profile it will attract good analysts who will produce “Good Enough” and “Fair Enough” reports. But in due course they will become increasingly disenchanted with the fact that their conclusions and recommendations have all been drafted in advance regardless of their expertise, while the “Enough” leaders continue to make their high-profile statements without reference to the in-house or commissioned expertise. Inevitably there will be an internal dispute leading to the organization splitting or abandoning one part of its self-defined mandate.

  2. Abdoulaye Abou Mekk 1 August, 2009 at 22:53

    Is it possible that the Chadian connection is the missing link which explains the Bassolé enigma? Which we may define as the confidence expressed by Paris and London in a man who has in a year proven solely that he is completely unsuited to the job he has been given. I ask this question because as with many after this last year I am bemused by the choice of Bassolé and not only that, also his strategy, which bears the hallmark of a man used to operating in the shadows. The elevation of Khalid Ibrahim to be the single spokesman for Darfour was an approach that made sense only in the context of a hidden counterpart. Could it be that a secret deal has been cut by Paris, Doha, and Tripoli, to establish a new order in the Chad Basin-eastern Sahel, and this yet-to-be explained entente is the explanation for the Bassolé strategy? When all the impossible theses have been disproven, what remains, however improbable, can only be the truth. Could this be the answer of the Bassolé enigma?

  3. Dr. El-tahir El-faki 1 August, 2009 at 23:50

    Dear Alex
    The impact of Darfur problem on Chad must not be underestimated. The overall analysis of the Sudanese/Chadian asymmetry needs to be addressed more thoroughly than just a cliché. Unlike Chad Sudan is a make of English colonial system well recognised for establishing state institutions and good governing in its colonies compared to its French counterpart? It is therefore the English left Sudan with better established state institutions and infra structures relative to Chad. The NCP has inherited some of those institutions, albeit their successive weaknesses by the succeeding regimes. On the other hand Chadians were left with little established state institutions and infrastructure to survive let alone flourish. President Idriss Deby is trying his best to overcome such formidable obstacles against all odds.

    While the political power in Sudan remains firmly under the control of three tribes since independence, Chadian Presidency rotated among different tribes in the country and. All the major ministries in Chad are well distributed and not held by the Zaghawa tribe. The existence in Chad of an elected parliament however week it may be will eventually lead to established form of institutions and accountability. Present weakness of MPS must not be taken to blame the president. It is only a matter of time before we see strong parliamentary authority

    Sudan enjoyed some degrees of state security and political stability even during the war in the South while Chad continues to suffer ongoing insecurity and political struggles long before Idriss Deby came into power. During those years Sudanese political forces strengthened their organisations and promoted some political systems. The emergence of the National Islamic Front remains an example. Chad did not have such chances.

    As far as the relation between JEM and Chad is concerned it should be born in mind that JEM had not suffered as much from other countries as it had from the Chadian regime of Idriss Deby. During the first few years of the insurgency JEM remained sandwiched between Sudan government and a hostile Chad and yet it survived and came out stronger. JEM has over 50 offices worldwide and its office in Chad is one of them. Like all foreign relations there are better or best relations with certain countries base on mutual interests. JEM is not locked in any position to control a sovereign state such as Chad. On the other hand JEM will not be subject for control by others.

  4. Alex de Waal 2 August, 2009 at 10:03

    Dear Tahir,

    JEM’s political position vis-a-vis the government of Chad is entirely understandable and your statements reflect that. It is quite correct for you to note that in the Darfur conflict Idriss Deby was at first friendly to Khartoum and tried to undermine or split JEM. This changed in 2005/06. The stability and modest democratization of Chad under the MPS was halted and reversed by the fallout from Darfur. The character of the Deby government has now changed. It is also correct that the Chadian government has rotated among different groups. However, this has not been a democratic or consensual process by any means.

    Like it or not, JEM is now a political player of significance in both Sudan and Chad. In Chad, the relationship is, as you write, one of mutual interest in the security and political sphere. In the Sudanese arena, JEM has many more options than in Chad, and has a more complex agenda. Power is of course the aim. Not necessarily control of sovereign power but sufficient power to safeguard and advance a political agenda which is both a grand vision for the future of the country and also involves the interests of JEM’s constituency.

    At present, the political dynamics of Sudan are located at the national level, and this is where JEM’s agenda resides, correctly. Unfortunately, the means have not yet been provided for JEM to play constructive politics at this level.

    Events over the last 18 months have made JEM the most prominent political-military force in Darfur opposed to the Sudan Government. The favourable circumstances may not prevail, especially given the continued implementation of the CPA and the countdown to self-determination in southern Sudan. A moment is fast approaching in which the JEM leadership will need to make a bold decision to shift the centre of gravity of its strategy to engagement in Sudan in a way that is fundamentally political. I hope that the opportunity and framework for enabling this to happen will quickly be in place.

  5. Jibreel Mohamed 2 August, 2009 at 15:16

    Dear Tahir,

    much as I sympathize with JEM’s cause and admire the principles and commitment of you and your members, the more you sound like an ambassador for the Deby regime, the less credible your political critique of Sudan becomes. The injustices and inequities you eloquently describe for Sudan and the NCP are found just as much, or even more so, in the case of Chad and the Deby regime. We all understand the political reasons why JEM has made its pact with N’djamena but there is no need to become Deby’s spokesman as well. Don’t expose yourself to the double standards critique when you don’t need to.

    Be alert to the shifting tides of politics. If Enough is publishing this report, now, consider what it prefigures. President Deby has had a very easy ride internationally because of the demonization of the NCP regime. If that is going to change, you are well advised to be ahead of the curve. JEM belongs in Sudan not Chad.

    Jibreel

  6. Jibreel Mohamed 3 August, 2009 at 08:53

    After writing my comment yesterday I read JEM’s attack on General Gratian, which looks to all the world like the flailing of a desperate leadership. After all the hard military and political work that went into positioning JEM as the leading representative of the movements, in Doha and in Washington, this is not a good signal. I also see that after spending a year betting on JEM to deliver, Bassole is now running to Libya to meet with the Tripoli group, again following in the footsteps of Mbeki, and the Libyans are promising to deliver all the movements for a meeting to take place before Ramadhan. JEM’s place in the sun is slipping away.

  7. Patrickvussy 27 August, 2021 at 07:28

    https://cialiswithdapoxetine.com/ cheap cialis

Leave a reply Cancel reply

  • Covid-19Into Africa PodcastPolitics

    Podcast: Virtues of virtual election monitoring

  • uk africa trade Dignity factory workers producing shirts for overseas clients in Accra, Ghana. Credit: Dominic Chavez/World Bank.
    EconomyTop story

    UK-Africa trade after Brexit: Time for a reset

  • Politics

    International Justice Debate at “African Arguments”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Click here to subscribe to our free weekly newsletter and never miss a thing!

  • 81664
    Followers

Find us on Facebook

Interactive Elections Map

Keep up to date with all the African elections.

Popular articles

  • Judges in Francois Beya Kasonga's trial in the DR Congo are set to pass a verdict on 23 June.

    The unseen trial of Congo’s “phantom spymaster” and what it means

  • Dating apps are popular ways in which people in Nigeria find dates.

    “The minority of the minority”: Dating while queer…and with a disability

  • Donated breast milk in a refrigerator at St Francis Hospital Nsambya in Kampala, Uganda. In November, the hospital launched the country’s first breast milk bank. Credit: Patricia Lindrio/GPJ.

    Saving lives and broken hearts with breast milk in Uganda

  • Dr Kanda at the Lwano mobile screening camp in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Credit: Xavier Vahed-DNDi.

    Africa-led progress on neglected tropical diseases needs boost in Kigali

  • Evangelista Kanohili sits outside her home in Sheema, Uganda, March 15, 2022. Kanohili has been experiencing on-and-off infestations of jiggers, a small parasitic flea that burrows into the skin and can make it too painful to take care of daily tasks. Credit: Apophia Agiresaasi/Global Press Journal.

    Uganda: The tiny flea making it painful for people to walk and work

Brought to you by


Creative Commons

Creative Commons Licence
Articles on African Arguments are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
  • Cookies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • en English
    am Amharicar Arabicny Chichewazh-CN Chinese (Simplified)en Englishfr Frenchde Germanha Hausait Italianpt Portuguesest Sesothosn Shonaes Spanishsw Swahilixh Xhosayo Yorubazu Zulu
© Copyright African Arguments 2020
Cleantalk Pixel
By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
en English
am Amharicar Arabicny Chichewazh-CN Chinese (Simplified)en Englishfr Frenchde Germanha Hausait Italianpt Portuguesest Sesothosn Shonaes Spanishsw Swahilixh Xhosayo Yorubazu Zulu
African Arguments wants to hear from you!

Take 5 minutes to fill in this short reader survey and you could win three African Arguments books of your choice…as well as our eternal gratitude.