African Arguments

Top Menu

  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Climate
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • Think African [Podcast]
    • #EndSARS
    • Into Africa [Podcast]
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Africa Science Focus [Podcast]
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Debating Ideas
  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

logo

African Arguments

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Climate
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • Think African [Podcast]
    • #EndSARS
    • Into Africa [Podcast]
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Africa Science Focus [Podcast]
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Debating Ideas
Politics
Home›African Arguments›Politics›Addis dispatches: at the IGAD peace talks for South Sudan

Addis dispatches: at the IGAD peace talks for South Sudan

By Uncategorised
August 7, 2014
2076
0
img-1
Flooding at Protection of Civilian site

Whilst peace negotiations continue behind schedule, thousands of South Sudanese continue to live in IDP camp across the country.

The excuse was laughable, if tragic. Explaining that the “˜banks are closed’ for the Eid-al-Fitr and Martyrs’ Day holidays, the government of South Sudan delegation stated it was unable to travel to Addis Ababa on 30 July. Talks were due to resume the next day. Memo to the government delegates: all the big hotels in Addis take Visa. Students behind on their homework have evolved more sophisticated excuses. But this outrageous behaviour seems largely the result of government incompetence and miscommunication rather than a calculated policy. Incompetence or not, the government faces no apparent political cost for this latest unjustified delay.

It doesn’t seem unreasonable to say that when your country is in flames, no one gets to take holidays, let alone the delegation empowered to end the crisis. One doubts the hundreds of thousands of refugees and internally displaced persons or the millions on the brink of famine felt in much of a holiday mood.

Obsessing over process, not substance

The last round of talks adjourned on 23 June after the mediation was unable to overcome the SPLM/A (In Opposition)’s principal objections: what it deemed the flawed representation of other parties to the talks – civil society, political parties and faith based organisations – and concern over the procedures for decision-making. During the adjournment, the mediation worked to correct representation, and added further civil society, political party and faith representatives to the talks. Importantly, the mediation won a commitment from Riek Machar to accept to participate in multi-party talks if the representation issue was corrected.

Talks therefore resumed on 4 August with the expectation that the revised representation of the non-SPLM groups would mean the opposition would come to the table. They attended the opening, but refused to participate the next day. Instead of engaging with the agenda, agreeing to the mediators’ proposals for the format and structure of future negotiations and beginning to make substantive progress, the latest round of talks has again bogged down in procedural matters.

Continuing its objections despite the amendments to representation reveals the SPLM/A (IO)’s true reason for discontent with a multi-party process: it objects to the participation of the so-called Group of 10, also known as the former SPLM detainees. The SPLM/A (IO)’s position suits the government just fine: both would be happy to return to a process that involves only a narrower elite, which can ignore the inconvenience of broader participation and new ideas. It would also likely mean a deal in which both sides escape any real measures of accountability.

Missing the August 10 deadline: then what?

When the sixty-day deadline to complete formation of a transitional government of national unity was agreed on the side-lines of the Assembly of the IGAD Heads of State and Government on June 10, it was already an ambitious target.

At the time, it was hoped setting a deadline would push the parties to move faster and commit them to a defined timeline for action. That gambit has not paid off. Missing the deadline would matter less if some substantive progress had been made: with days to go even that latter aim seems unlikely.

The region faces four choices in the coming week: one, either pressure the government and SPLM/A (IO) to rush to an imperfect agreement by the deadline, and therefore one that they are unlikely to believe in, let alone implement; two, overlook the missed deadline and allow the parties more time to negotiate further; three, attempt punitive measures to induce the parties to end their intransigence; four, attempt to cut a deal outside of the Addis process, one that will almost certainly prioritize power sharing between Kiir and Machar at the expense of everyone else.  None of the options are particularly good.

Inclusivity: promise disappointed so far, potential remains

The May 9 Agreement had transformative potential: by including the former detainees, political parties and civil society, a broader and more far-reaching dialogue became possible in the Addis process. So far, the participation of civil society in the negotiations has only been notable for its internecine feuding. Far from contributing ideas and arguing for a better South Sudan, the obsession has been to compete to achieve “˜representation.’

Get to the table in Addis! That is what matters! What one should do when at the table seems a distant consideration. So far, the most substantive contributions from civil society have come from those who haven’t even attended the talks. The promise of an inclusive process has been sorely disappointed. Civil society delegates have one more chance to prove that their attendance and participation can be meaningful: this attempt at inclusivity may not survive another failure of process, if the SPLM/A (IO) and government delegations don’t kill the concept of inclusivity first.

This post is contributed by a long-time observer of South Sudan who has closely followed the Addis talks. 

Previous Article

One hundred years on, we must not ...

Next Article

US-Africa summit showcases continent’s expanding economies – ...

img-3

Uncategorised

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • img-4
    Politics

    Africapitalism: Unleashing the power of emotions for Africa’s Development? – By Kenneth Amaeshi

  • Politics

    How Obama Could Uplift Africa

  • img-5
    Politics

    African Arguments top article of the year: a competition

Subscribe to our newsletter

Click here to subscribe to our free weekly newsletter and never miss a thing!

  • 81.7K+
    Followers

Find us on Facebook

Interactive Elections Map

Keep up to date with all the African elections.

Recent Posts

  • Djibouti fiddles as the super-powers scramble for the Red Sea
  • Why France EACOP case might embolden, not discourage, activists
  • The International Community Must Reconsider its Engagement with Somaliland
  • Unpacking the geopolitics of Uganda’s anti-gay bill
  • Why’s the AfDB siding with the Agrochemical Industrial Complex?

Editor’s Picks

ClimateEditor's PicksKenyaTanzania

“My house is crumbling”: Living in limbo along the East Africa pipeline

People along the route of the proposed 1,443 km oil pipeline talk of confusion, uncertainty and lives on hold. Following the recent signing of accords, the construction of a hugely ...
  • Rasha Mekky with her adopted son Mostafa. Credit: Rasha Mekky.

    “People said it’s haram”: Happy mums show reality of adoption in Egypt

    By Lara Reffat
    May 25, 2022
  • Exhibits from Michael Soi's "China Loves Africa" exhibition at the Circle Art Gallery in Nairobi. Credit: Circle Art Gallery.

    Why is Africa always portrayed as a passive woman?

    By Nanjala Nyabola
    September 18, 2018
  • Renters struggle to find suitable homes and pay rent in many cities in Nigeria, such as Lagos. Credit: Naparazzi.

    What will it take for monthly rent payment to work in Nigeria?

    By Immaculata Abba
    July 27, 2022
  • In 2011, mass protests led to the downfall of President Mubarak. In 2013, the military retook power in a coup. Credit: Gigi Ibrahim.

    This is how our revolution in Egypt failed. Sudan, please be warned.

    By Osama Gaweesh
    June 5, 2019

Brought to you by

img-11

Creative Commons

Creative Commons Licence
Articles on African Arguments are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
  • Cookies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© Copyright African Arguments 2020
By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our use of cookies.