African Arguments

Top Menu

  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
    • Climate crisis
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • #EndSARS
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Podcast
    • Into Africa Podcast
    • Africa Science Focus Podcast
    • Think African Podcast
  • Debating Ideas
  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

logo

African Arguments

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
    • Climate crisis
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • #EndSARS
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Podcast
    • Into Africa Podcast
    • Africa Science Focus Podcast
    • Think African Podcast
  • Debating Ideas
Politics
Home›African Arguments›Politics›Kosovo and Darfur

Kosovo and Darfur

By admin
February 27, 2008
2048
2

Posted on behalf of Cara Parks of the New Republic

Yesterday on the New Republic website we ran an editorial on Darfur that I think your readers would really enjoy. The piece uses the declaration of Kosovo’s independence last week to look back at NATO’s involvement in the region — and then compares this experience with the ongoing crisis in Darfur. It’s a provocative piece that urges help for the Darfur region, and I think you and your readers would find it interesting.

Previous Article

The Activism Debate, continued…

Next Article

Land, Power and Peace in Sudan

admin

2 comments

  1. Alex de Waal 27 February, 2008 at 11:55

    Yesterday’s New Republic invited us to consider the difference between Kosovo and Darfur. The argument is one we have heard many times: “the people of Darfur are waiting (still!) for the West to come to their rescue.”

    It’s a provocative argument though hardly a new one. But the parallel has its perils. When Anthony Lake, Susan Rice and Donald Payne wrote an Oped calling for Kosovo-style action on Darfur in the Washington Post in October 2006, the implications were not lost on the government of Sudan. The Republican Palace espied an American agenda of Darfurian secession and Khartoum regime change under the cover of a humanitarian intervention. I am not saying Khartoum’s view was correct, just that Opeds have consequences, and one of them is how the opinions are interpreted by the targets of advocacy. In this case, it was taken seriously as a statement of intent by people who would likely have a leading role in shaping the foreign policy of a future Democrat administration.

    In the wake of the Kosovo campaign, there was a debate among humanitarians as to whether the intervention was justified. Critics pointed out that the majority of the violations occurred during the air campaign itself, and therefore that the NATO operation could be said to have prompted the abuses that it was designed to halt. I am not persuaded by this criticism. Slobodan Milosevic was a serial aggressor and ethnic cleanser and it would have been foolish to trust him to change his behavior. But nonetheless, we need to be alert to the unintended consequences of declaring military action—it’s likely that the adversary will respond militarily, and strike first. So it has been in Sudan. In August and September 2006, when Khartoum feared an imminent non-consensual deployment of UN troops, it went on the offensive in Darfur and Chad to try to create a fait accompli. Many hundreds died. Just a month ago, days before the scheduled deployment of the European Force in Chad, Sudanese security did something rather similar. Many hundreds died. That is at least fair warning that if (for example) an incoming U.S. president were to take office with a public commitment to military action in Darfur, we could expect a repeat performance.

    For me, the strongest argument against military intervention is its imprudence. Similar considerations apply when considering making a threat of intervention or a non-consensual or non-neutral military deployment.

  2. Julie Flint 28 February, 2008 at 20:06

    In calling for armed international intervention in Darfur, the New Republic ignores the all-important differences between Kosovo and Darfur. Kosovo was a small territory with well-defined armed groups. Kosovans were overwhelmingly in favour of foreign intervention. Darfur is a vast area with a chaotic and ever-changing mess of armed groups. (The fragmentation that has long affected the non-Arab rebels is now spreading to the Arab side of the divide too.) Most crucially, many of Darfur’s people – its Arab tribes especially — are radically opposed to armed intervention by outside forces. The most likely result would not be a ‘happy ending’, but vastly increased civilian death and the collapse of an international aid programme that is keeping millions alive. An ending more akin to what armed intervention has wrought in Iraq than the fairy tale of the editorialist’s imagining.
    The offensive in Jebel Mun is criminal, but wholly predictable. Where was the voice of the New Republic when JEM took control of these villages last year and began a campaign of government-baiting that was bound — designed? – to get a response? JEM comes from the NIF; its leaders are children of the NIF. As it threatened to seize the state capital, claimed massive new Arab support, spoke of shooting down planes and congratulated Chadian President Idriss Deby on his "success" in defeating his own rebels (a success in which JEM played a vital role), Khalil Ibrahim’s men must have known how Khartoum would respond because this government has only ever had one way of responding — from the Nuba mountains of central Sudan, to the oilfields of southern Sudan, to Darfur in western Sudan: through extreme violence targeted at civilians. JEM knows this better than anyone.
    From the beginning of this conflict, JEM has been trying to deligitimize the Khartoum government through ‘genocide’. As the New Republic itself says, the current west Darfur offensive is the deadliest ‘in many, many months.’ Compiled reports by humanitarians and the UN indicate that violent civilian deaths over the previous 36 months were approximately 200 a month, in the last year half of them Arab. It’s very easy to take the high moral ground after the fact. It’s far harder to sound a warning voice in time and attempt to prevent such tragedies.

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • A billboard in Moroni, Comoros' capital, reads: "Mayotte is Comorian and will always be". Credit: Ali Y. Alwahti.
    ComorosPolitics

    Comoros row with France intensifies as turmoil brews at home

  • Debating IdeasEthiopiaWar and War Crimes

    Wax and Gold: The War for the Body and Spirit of Ethiopia

  • NigeriaSociety

    Digital tech: improving access to education in Nigeria [Haller Prize 2nd place]

Subscribe to our newsletter

Click here to subscribe to our free weekly newsletter and never miss a thing!

  • 81.7K+
    Followers

Find us on Facebook

Interactive Elections Map

Keep up to date with all the African elections.

Recent Posts

  • Oligarchs, Oil and Obi-dients: The battle for the soul of Nigeria
  • Of cobblers, colonialism, and choices
  • Blackness, Pan-African Consciousness and Women’s Political Organising through the Magazine AWA
  • “People want to be rich overnight”: Nigeria logging abounds despite ban
  • The unaccountability of Liberia’s polluting miners

Editor’s Picks

Editor's PicksSociety

The pandemic has set gender equality back. Its legacy must not.

The COVID-19 pandemic has been tough on everyone, but women have shouldered the bulk of the burden at home and at work. Most years, International Women’s Day offers an opportunity ...
  • Women and men at the #ArewaMeToo rally in Kano state pushing for the state to domesticate the VAPP Act. Credit: Abubakar Shehu.

    What happens when we protest: #MeToo in northern Nigeria

    By Hauwa Shaffii Nuhu
    March 11, 2020
  • Don’t just vote. Mobilise. (Aka Why elections won’t change Nigeria)

    By Ayo Sogunro
    January 29, 2019
  • east africa pipeline Okecha Cibojo, a farmer in Nyamtai village, Kikuube District in Western region of Uganda standing by CNOOC beacons marking the route of a feeder pipeline for Kingfisher project. Credit: Maina Waruru.

    “My house is crumbling”: Living in limbo along the East Africa pipeline

    By Maina Waruru
    April 21, 2021
  • Hundreds march in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, in 2017 calling on people to speak out and take action to end violence against women and girls. Credit: UN Women/Deepika Nath.

    A woman online, in Tanzania

    By Elsie Eyakuze
    November 7, 2018

Brought to you by


Creative Commons

Creative Commons Licence
Articles on African Arguments are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
  • Cookies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • en English
    am Amharicar Arabicny Chichewazh-CN Chinese (Simplified)en Englishfr Frenchde Germanha Hausait Italianpt Portuguesest Sesothosn Shonaes Spanishsw Swahilixh Xhosayo Yorubazu Zulu
© Copyright African Arguments 2020
By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our use of cookies.
en English
am Amharicar Arabicny Chichewazh-CN Chinese (Simplified)en Englishfr Frenchde Germanha Hausait Italianpt Portuguesest Sesothosn Shonaes Spanishsw Swahilixh Xhosayo Yorubazu Zulu