African Arguments

Top Menu

  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Climate
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • Think African [Podcast]
    • #EndSARS
    • Into Africa [Podcast]
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Africa Science Focus [Podcast]
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Debating Ideas
  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

logo

African Arguments

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Climate
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • Think African [Podcast]
    • #EndSARS
    • Into Africa [Podcast]
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Africa Science Focus [Podcast]
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Debating Ideas
Politics
Home›African Arguments›Politics›Addressing the Devastation

Addressing the Devastation

By Sarah Holewinski
December 14, 2008
1821
0

The killing of civilians is nothing new, writes Hugo Slim. A historic and global phenomenon, the killing of civilians does however seem more present than ever, with round the clock news reporting of the horrors civilians endure. Political and public outcry is growing into a steady roar. Just last month, President Karzai demanded President-elect Obama stem Afghan deaths while Pakistani villagers protested in the streets for their loved ones killed, and that’s in but one small corner of the world.

If Slim eloquently exposes the hows and whys of civilian killing in war, he also seems to see a way out: public pressure to change. Rape is now deemed unacceptable; cluster munitions will be banned in December by over 100 countries; children cannot be used as soldiers. Time and again, the way wars are fought changes as public opinion changes. We find ourselves in just such a time now, with so many of us rejecting the needless suffering of war victims the world over.

So what’s the next big change in the way wars are fought? Not today, but soon, warring parties may be expected to help the civilians they harm.

Unintentional harm to civilians is rationalized to a point under international law, with “collateral damage” a regrettable but understood part of warfare. With public pressure mounting, many militaries now pride themselves on limiting civilian casualties. The US is case in point: no press conference from Baghram or Baghdad is complete without assurances of the great pains taken to avoid civilians. Yet when it comes to addressing the devastation that inevitably comes with their bullets and bombs, warring parties have traditionally left civilians to pick up the pieces of their lives without the respect and help they deserve.

There are some, however, that are reconsidering that position and finding it in their best interests both morally and strategically to make amends for the harm they cause. Not one to set the standard for emerging international norms, the United States began compensating civilians harmed by its military during World War II and today makes “˜condolence’ payments to those harmed in Iraq and Afghanistan. America also funds livelihood assistance programs for families harmed by US forces. In Afghanistan, NATO member states have donated to a relief fund that assists communities after a battle. The Philippines is considering compensation to civilians, as is Georgia to South Ossetians. None of these efforts are an admission of legal liability or fault for the harm. Still, with every gesture of recognition, compensation, rebuilding or donation to NGOs helping recovery, these nations have crossed the next ethical threshold in the conduct of war and are changing the way wars are fought. They are recognizing the inherent dignity and worth of these victims and their suffering; civilian losses have not been overlooked.

Non-state actors understand the import of this too. Sahib Dad, an Afghan man I met in Kabul, lost two daughters to a US bomb right in his front yard. The Taliban brought cotton to wrap the dead, food, and money. What America lost in respect and support, the Taliban gained in this case. So while some warring parties are tearing the citizenry apart, in places like Congo and Somalia where countless war crimes are being committed daily, there are others that see the protection and well-being of the local citizenry as vital to their mission.

I met a shepherd in southern Lebanon who’d lost a hundred heads of cattle to cluster duds in the fields; they had literally been blown away. In the next town over, a little boy showed me his mangled back, a memento of picking up a dud that looked like a toy. It’s enough to make a person wonder why countries that use those weapons aren’t the ones making the biggest contributions to de-mining programs. Making amends isn’t hand washing. It’s the right thing to do. As more and more nations (or non-state actors for that matter) practice this behavior, an expectation that the behavior will be practiced is building.

We would all rest easier if civilians were not killed or maimed in the first place. But should survivors of wars be left to mourn with nothing, no matter how unintentional the harm done? Whether in their own self interest or out of compassion, warring parties should be (and seem to be) asking themselves if civilians are owed something more.

Previous Article

Killing Civilians

Next Article

The Entire Range of Misery of Civilians ...

Sarah Holewinski

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Politics

    Mamdani Misrepresents the Armed Movements

  • Politics

    South Africa: economic shock the fault of poorly managed labour relations – By Madeline R. Young

  • A campaign event featuring a banner showing presidential candidate Emmanuel Shadary along with the outgoing President Joseph Kabila. Credit: Shadary Campaign.
    Congo-KinshasaPolitics

    DRC elections: Kabila’s perfectly imperfect choice of successor

Subscribe to our newsletter

Click here to subscribe to our free weekly newsletter and never miss a thing!

  • 81.7K+
    Followers

Find us on Facebook

Interactive Elections Map

Keep up to date with all the African elections.

Recent Posts

  • The two defining challenges facing South Africa
  • ‘Don’t Agonize, Organize!’ Remembering Tajudeen Abdul-Raheem’s Advocacy on Sudan
  • Four actions vulnerable countries need from COP28
  • Afrobeats: The birth of Afro-Adura
  • Sudan: How the generals disappeared the people on the way to the economy

Editor’s Picks

CultureEditor's PicksKenya

Can a Chinese import ever be authentically African?

Kitenge is made in China, but sold, worn and inscribed with meaning in Kenya. On Gaborone Road in Nairobi’s central business district, you can find at least a couple multi-storied ...
  • Poster of the legendary Thomas Mapfumo/Oliver Mtukudzi concerts in 2013. Image courtesy: Diana Jeater.

    Why ZANU-PF still can’t dance to chimurenga music

    By Mwai Daka
    April 19, 2023
  • The climate crisis has made weather patterns more extreme and unpredictable in northern Cameroon. Credit: Carsten ten Brink.

    The climate crisis tinderbox in northern Cameroon

    By Nalova Akua
    May 12, 2022
  • Bobi Wine and supporters at a rally this September don the red beret . Credit: Bobi Wine.

    To beat or not to beat: Museveni’s big Bobi Wine problem

    By Michael Mutyaba
    October 31, 2019
  • Asian-African

    It’s time to confront anti-Blackness in Asian-African communities

    By Sabrina Mahtani
    August 5, 2020

Brought to you by


Creative Commons

Creative Commons Licence
Articles on African Arguments are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
  • Cookies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© Copyright African Arguments 2020
By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our use of cookies.