African Arguments

Top Menu

  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Climate
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • Think African [Podcast]
    • #EndSARS
    • Into Africa [Podcast]
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Africa Science Focus [Podcast]
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Debating Ideas
  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

logo

African Arguments

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Climate
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • Think African [Podcast]
    • #EndSARS
    • Into Africa [Podcast]
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Africa Science Focus [Podcast]
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Debating Ideas
Politics
Home›African Arguments›Politics›Killing Civilians

Killing Civilians

By Alex de Waal
December 13, 2008
1732
0

This blog hosts occasional debates on significant books, relevant to Darfur and the wider questions that it raises. Killing Civilians: Method, Madness and Morality in War, by Hugo Slim, is one such book: it raises a series of profound questions about how and why civilians are killed in war””and how and why they are not killed, or are protected. We have asked a number of individuals to contribute their thoughts on this book, and Slim to respond.

img-1Hugo Slim’s book has a broad historical and contemporary analysis. We know that the killing, rape, robbery and torture of civilians is nothing new in history, and that it takes many different forms across different conflicts. Organizing this vast and dismal array of material into a coherent and succinct account is no small feat. What Slim succeeds in doing is not only cataloguing these horrors, but also providing a schema for beginning to typologize and understand. That’s a hugely useful task.

Slim’s chapter 4, “˜Anti-Civilian Ideologies’, is especially useful. He lays out a spectrum of “˜anti-civilian thinking.’ At one end is the extreme of genocidal logic in which the aim of violence is precisely to eradicate a civilian group. That eradication can even be celebrated. This is an absolutist rejection of the civilian ethic. It’s rare, but is strikingly present in some of the most extreme manifestations of genocidal ideology.

In the middle, are various forms whereby anti-civilian violence are rationalized. The killing may be justified out of political necessity. It may be that killing civilians “works” in pursuit of war ends, and is perhaps the most readily accessible means of fighting a war, particularly if the belligerents have limited capacity to target and defeat the enemy soldiers themselves. Killing civilians has political utility””the thinking is instrumental. Another line of reasoning is that the “civilian” status of the target group is ambiguous””they may be difficult to distinguish from combatants or may be aiding the enemy war effort to the extent that attacking them can be rationalized. In such cases, the perpetrators of the violence typically argue that they are reluctantly deviating from a norm.

At the other end of the spectrum are ideologies or explanations that regard civilian suffering and death as the regrettable but inevitable outcome of war””that’s simply how war is and it would be futile to try and pretend otherwise. In such cases, the perpetrators of violence do have (some) real belief in the civilian ethic, but find some reason to justify their actions when they do in fact engage in such killing.

Slim’s focus on ideology and the rationalization of killings is especially useful. Organizing mass violence is an intellectual task as much as a management challenge. The association between killing civilians and the promotion and internalization of dehumanizing stereotypes has often been noticed. There’s an implicit social theory in some such descriptions, implying that adopting and applying derogatory and dehumanizing views of the “other” is a causal prelude to mass killing. The correlation is clear to see””the causal links are less so. It may be that negative stereotyping arises (in part, or in some people) as a consequence of being required to kill. As Slim explains, the “eighty percent” rule is a sound guide to the extent to which ordinary people will act on orders to participate in violence against civilians””eighty percent of people will follow, ten percent will passively resist and only ten percent will actively resist. Most of those who follow the orders to kill will suffer some form of cognitive dissonance””a disturbing gap between their sense of themselves as fair and moral beings and their awareness of what they are doing””and will be ready to justify their actions by adopting negative stereotypes of the victims, allowing themselves to belief that they deserve their fate.

Another important line of rationalization is sacrificial thinking””the belief that it is necessary for people to suffer and for blood to be shed to achieve some higher goal. In wars of liberation””and wars presented as such””people will be prepared to put up with, and even endorse, extreme suffering if they believe that it is for greater good. Such lines of argument are deeply embedded in many societies. The idea that suffering is intrinsically meaningless, no more than an abomination, is often anathema.

Where does the Darfur war fall within this spectrum? Many of Slim’s insights are highly relevant. I would suggest that while there may be individuals who subscribe to the strands of thinking at each extreme of the spectrum, the majority are firmly within the middle categories. Killing civilians “works” in Sudan””in different ways for different belligerents.

Previous Article

Would states violate international law if they ...

Next Article

Addressing the Devastation

mm

Alex de Waal

Alex de Waal is Research Professor and Executive Director of the World Peace Foundation at The Fletcher School, Tufts University. He was the founding editor of the African Arguments book series. He is the author of The Real Politics of the Horn of Africa: Money, War and the Business of Power.

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Politics

    Human Rights Reporting on Darfur: A Genre that Redefines Tragedy (2)

  • img-3
    Politics

    Lonmin-Marikana: the end of South Africa’s post-Apartheid settlement? – By Richard Dowden

  • Politics

    A Crisis of Confidence in the Government of Sudan – By Asim Elhag

Subscribe to our newsletter

Click here to subscribe to our free weekly newsletter and never miss a thing!

  • 81.7K+
    Followers

Find us on Facebook

Interactive Elections Map

Keep up to date with all the African elections.

Recent Posts

  • Djibouti fiddles amid the scramble for the Red Sea
  • Why France EACOP case might embolden, not discourage, activists
  • The International Community Must Reconsider its Engagement with Somaliland
  • Unpacking the geopolitics of Uganda’s anti-gay bill
  • Why’s the AfDB siding with the Agrochemical Industrial Complex?

Editor’s Picks

Editor's PicksMauritiusPolitics

Mauritius: A picture perfect democracy’s fall from grace

Mauritius has been listed as one of the world’s top ten autocratising nations. Can the people save it? Over the past few decades, Mauritius has built a glowing international reputation. ...
  • israel cameroon

    Making a killing: Israeli mercenaries in Cameroon

    By Emmanuel Freudenthal & Youri van der Weide
    June 23, 2020
  • Nigeria's former president, Olusegun Obasanjo continues to wield significant influence in Nigeria. Credit: Friends of Europe.

    An interview with Olusegun Obasanjo: Up close and a little too personal

    By James Wan
    September 28, 2017
  • women covid UN Women/Ryan Brown

    The pandemic has set gender equality back. Its legacy must not.

    By Nana Adjoa Hackman
    March 8, 2021
  • President Hakainde Hichilema of Zambia meeting supporters. Credit: Hakainde Hichilema/Facebook.

    Zambia’s democracy is still under attack

    By Sishuwa Sishuwa
    March 22, 2022

Brought to you by

img-9

Creative Commons

Creative Commons Licence
Articles on African Arguments are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
  • Cookies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© Copyright African Arguments 2020
By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our use of cookies.