African Arguments

Top Menu

  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
    • Climate crisis
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • #EndSARS
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Podcast
    • Into Africa Podcast
    • Africa Science Focus Podcast
    • Think African Podcast
  • Debating Ideas
  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

logo

African Arguments

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
    • Climate crisis
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • #EndSARS
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Podcast
    • Into Africa Podcast
    • Africa Science Focus Podcast
    • Think African Podcast
  • Debating Ideas
Politics
Home›African Arguments›Politics›Concerned over the Submission to the ICC

Concerned over the Submission to the ICC

By Ahmed Hassan
January 21, 2009
1739
0

I am quite concerned and agitated about the current media coverage in Sudan which refers to a claimed “submission from two Sudanese Groups” to the ICC that might affect/delay the decision by the judges of the Pre-Trial Chamber on the case against Omar al-Bashir.

My questions are 1) What are these groups and is it not very likely that they are the creation of the regime in Sudan? 2) What gives them the legitimacy to represent the Sudanese people, not to say the persecuted people of Darfur in this specific matter? 3) On what grounds do they base their motion? and 4) Does the ICC mechanism really allow for such maneuvers from state-associated groups to affect and influence its decisions and proceedings towards the system which is under question and accusation?

I am aware that the international community is anxious and concerned about a similar state failure or staged violence as a result of the court decision, but is that strong reason enough to compromise justice and the rightful cause of Darfur? What counteractions could the movements in Darfur or in the Sudanese political arena, or even the people of Darfur and their supporters do to counter-balance the effects of this motion?

Previous Article

African Arguments Online

Next Article

African Democracy

Ahmed Hassan

0 comments

  1. Alex de Waal 21 January, 2009 at 08:29

    Dear Ahmed,

    The application was filed by a London-based law partnership, Sir Geoffrey Nice and Rodney Dixon, on behalf of two Sudanese groups, Sudan Workers Trade Unions Federation and the Sudan International Defence Group. You are correct in your surmise that the Government is likely to be involved in some way, and that it is an attempt, first, to slow down the Pre-Trial Chamber’s consideration of the case and second, to put some points into the public arena in support of the Government’s objections to the ICC.

    It seems unlikely that the judges of the Pre-Trial Chamber will consider the application as it the organizations have bypassed the normal procedure of first applying for the standing of amicus curiae and then making their submission. Nice and Dixon have bypassed that stage and simply put their arguments straight before the judges and into the public realm. The ICC has made a special point of giving a voice to victims or survivors of crimes and it is most unlikely that the judges would consider privileging this application over and above any submissions from victims or victims’ organizations. If the judges were to accept this, they would then be obliged to extend invitations to groups which have campaigned for victims’ rights or in favour of prosecution. That would slow down the whole process of issuing the arrest warrant.

    Having said that, the submission does make some cogent points, for which it has been applauded by the leading British legal journalist Joshua Rozenberg. For example, it criticizes the Prosecutor for making a series of public statements which assume the guilt of the individual he is charging.

    Perhaps more importantly, the international community has been pressing the Sudan Government to engage with the ICC. This application is a means of indirectly engaging with the Court and it would be advisable for the judges to treat it in this manner.

    The application cites a report by me, which the two lawyers saw in the form of a draft that I circulated to a number of legal scholars. The quotations are no more than what I have already said publicly on the topic, mostly in this blog. I am in the process of finalizing this report for publication on this site before the end of the month.

  2. Khalid Omer 22 January, 2009 at 00:06

    I agree with Alex partially. The judges will indeed reject the application for a number of reasons

    1. The Rome Statute says that only the State or the accused can file motions before the ICC judges. Neither of these two organizations satisfy this requirement.

    2. At this stage of the proceedings no submissions are allowed from parties other than the prosecutor or the registry unless the judges asks for observations from a third party similar to when they requested it from Louise Arbor and Antonio Cassesse before Haroun and Kushayb were indicted.

    3. One of the groups met with Sudanese officials last year and they promised to extend support to them so Khartoum is behind them at least indirectly.

    4. The motion in itself lacks any legal substance or arguments in the prosecutor’s application relating to facts and events mentioned in it. Gathering a million signature is not something the judges would really look at.

    5. Attacking the prosecutor or his conduct is irrelevant to to the case or facts the judges will look at. This is something for the State parties. The judges look at whether there is reasonable evidence to issue an arrest warrant or there is not. It’s that simple.

    6. Obviously the prosecutor thinks Bashir or Bemba or Lubanga are guilty otherwise he wouldn’t submit a case against him. I am not sure why Alex thinks that Ocampo’s assuming guilt is irrational or unreasonable. If the prosecutor was to say “maybe Bashir is guilty maybe not” would this make any sense? Probably not. His case assumes the guilt of Bashir .

    7. Interesting fact that they cite Bona Malwal but they never mention that he is an adviser to Bashir.

    8. I am surprised Joshua Rozenberg thinks that this motion will delay a decision given his in depth legal knowledge. Unfortunately following Rozenberg closely he sometimes seems to be influenced by his negative view of Ocampo which makes it hard to give him full credibility when he writes on the ICC at least that’s how I personally feel.

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Politics

    An African President of the World Bank is not the Solution, when the Bank itself is the Problem – By Desné Masie

  • Politics

    Rwanda: Past Politics and Present Preservation of the Gacaca Files

  • Politics

    Badme border dispute: Why Ethiopia Won’t back down on Eritrean border – By Michael Woldemariam

Subscribe to our newsletter

Click here to subscribe to our free weekly newsletter and never miss a thing!

  • 81.7K+
    Followers

Find us on Facebook

Interactive Elections Map

Keep up to date with all the African elections.

Recent Posts

  • The unaccountability of Liberia’s polluting miners
  • Africa Elections 2023: All the upcoming votes
  • “Poking the Leopard’s Anus”: Legal Spectacle and Queer Feminist Politics
  • Introducing Parselelo and a new climate focus
  • The ‘Hustler’ Fund: Kenya’s Approach to National Transformation

Editor’s Picks

BotswanaEditor's PicksSociety

“Fully embraced”? Bostwana’s queer struggles since decriminalisation

The landmark 2019 ruling has been upheld, but Botswana’s LGBTQ community still face numerous challenges.  In November 2021, Botswana’s Court of Appeal upheld a landmark 2019 ruling that had decriminalised ...
  • Dr Stella Nyanzi at a human rights conference in 2018. Credit: Chapter Four Uganda.

    Stella Nyanzi: The rude vagina-poem-writing hero Uganda needs

    By Rosebell Kagumire
    July 9, 2019
  • Angola’s oil could actually be the DR Congo’s. Here’s why it isn’t.

    By Patrick Edmond, Kristof Titeca & Erik Kennes
    October 3, 2019
  • People gather for an open air film screening in Khartoum, Sudan.

    Charlie Chaplin and the reclaiming of Sudan

    By Samira Sawlani
    November 5, 2019
  • Mauritius oil spill. Credit: Vel Moonien.

    Mauritius: A class action lawsuit bubbles two years after the oil spill

    By Vel Moonien
    August 26, 2022

Brought to you by


Creative Commons

Creative Commons Licence
Articles on African Arguments are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
  • Cookies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • en English
    am Amharicar Arabicny Chichewazh-CN Chinese (Simplified)en Englishfr Frenchde Germanha Hausait Italianpt Portuguesest Sesothosn Shonaes Spanishsw Swahilixh Xhosayo Yorubazu Zulu
© Copyright African Arguments 2020
By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our use of cookies.
en English
am Amharicar Arabicny Chichewazh-CN Chinese (Simplified)en Englishfr Frenchde Germanha Hausait Italianpt Portuguesest Sesothosn Shonaes Spanishsw Swahilixh Xhosayo Yorubazu Zulu