African Arguments

Top Menu

  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
    • Climate crisis
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • #EndSARS
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Podcast
    • Into Africa Podcast
    • Africa Science Focus Podcast
    • Think African Podcast
  • Debating Ideas
  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

logo

African Arguments

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
    • Climate crisis
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • #EndSARS
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Podcast
    • Into Africa Podcast
    • Africa Science Focus Podcast
    • Think African Podcast
  • Debating Ideas
Politics
Home›African Arguments›Politics›Response to ‘A Waste of Hope’

Response to ‘A Waste of Hope’

By admin
July 19, 2009
2085
0

The following letter from a senior ICC official has been published in World Affairs in response to the article by Julie Flint and Alex de Waal on the Prosecutor.

Luis Moreno Ocampo
Dear Sir:

Alex de Waal advance against Luis Moreno Ocampo (“Case Closed,” Spring 2009), it helps to know that the authors’ real grievance is that leveling international charges against Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir is a mistake. The authors put forward Moreno Ocampo as the alleged incompetent, but their true disagreement is with a host of actors: the ICC Judges, who issued the warrant naming Bashir; the governments of the U.S., U.K., and France, who have firmly resisted calls to defer Bashir’s prosecution; the UN Security Council, which referred the Darfur case to the ICC back in 2005; and Darfuris themselves, who favor the view that peace in Darfur will not be attained absent justice. I can state that their portrayal of Moreno Ocampo’s ICC tenure rests on a base of misstated facts and material omissions. The authors also fail to disclose the interests and biases of their (unnamed) sources. The authors also fall well short of proving that Moreno Ocampo’s tenure has been incompetent or that he has acted “without borders.” Moreno Ocampo’s decision that his criminal investigators could not safely operate in Darfur was cautious and, in the end, correct. The Sudanese government indeed detained and tortured persons believed to be cooperating with the ICC and recently expelled aid groups based on the same pretext. Most have judged that this Prosecutor’s tenure has been characterized by extreme conservatism in executing the prosecutorial mandate: four investigations opened in the world’s worst conflicts and in each case following either self-referral by an involved State or referral by the Security Council. The Prosecutor’s strict observance of boundaries is what accounts, in no small part, for the Bush administration’s abandonment, over time, of its categorical opposition to support for the court’s work. The issue is not the man or the woman: it’s the mandate and, now, the institution. The view of Flint and de Waal””to propose no solution other than to let even the world’s worst atrocities continue””is becoming obsolete. Discussing policy might be more productive than engaging in character assassination.

Christine Chung
Former ICC Senior Trial
Attorney (2004–2007)

Previous Article

Kenya: The Normalisation of Violence

Next Article

Humanitarian aid and the International Criminal Court: ...

admin

0 comments

  1. Christian Palme 20 July, 2009 at 17:02

    Christine Chung’s fuming response to Alex de Waal’s and Julie Flint’s carefully researched and rather moderate review of the confused years of Luis Moreno Ocampo’s years as ICC Prosecutor needs some background to be fully understood.
    In the Prosecution Division of the ICC OTP (Office of the Prosecutor) Chung played the role of Moreno Ocampo’s special confidante and hit man. It was a well known fact in the OTP that Chung and Moreno Ocampo had a special and personal relationship. She had the right to bypass her own superior in the Prosecution Division, Deputy Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda, and go directly to Moreno Ocampo, very often providing critical information regarding her colleagues or even her supervisor, the Deputy Prosecutor. Indeed, on one occasion, in 2006, Chung despatched a 500 word e-mail to Moreno Ocampo with accusations against Bensouda for being incompetent. The wording in this e-mail (which I have read, courtesy of Moreno Ocampo’s personal assistant Sofia Velasco), was such that in any normal organisation an employee who, while bypassing her own superior had sent a similar letter to a principal, would have been the subject of disciplinary proceedings, or even immediate dismissal. The problem of Chung’s short cut to Moreno Ocampo was widely discussed in the office and one (brave) colleague of Chung in the PD (Prosecution Division) even had the audacity to bring it up in a conference with all OTP managers present.
    Chung was also known for aggresively hunting Moreno Ocampo dissenters in the office, often with e-mails that were copied to many staff members. These e-mails routinely were laced with highly abusive personal remarks. The Investigation Divison even had compiled a special file of these abusive e-mails. One staff member in the end found it necessary to invoke the internal rules against “sexual and other forms of harassment” in order to bring a halt to Chung’s abusive campaign.
    Chung’s comments to World Affairs should hence not be seen as independent of Moreno Ocampo, but rather as a proxie or client acting on orders from Moreno Ocampo.

    Christian Palme
    former Public Information Adviser to the ICC prosecutor.

  2. Julie Flint and Alex de Waal 21 July, 2009 at 07:23

    We had hoped for a more substantive reply than that contained in former trial attorney Christine Chung’s letter. Nonetheless, the issues demand a response.

    First, what is the insinuation behind the “authors’ real grievance”? It is no secret that we believe that the leveling of these charges at this time against President Bashir is an error.

    We would have much preferred to cite former members of the ICC on the record. It is revealing that his critics prefer to remain anonymous, even in scholarly journals.

    Third, while there are many Darfurians who support the ICC, there are many who oppose it, or would prefer a different approach to the question of justice. Many who welcomed the charges against Bashir expected his arrest to follow. They are already asking “Why isn’t he in jail?”

    The OTP’s “conservatism” in restricting the number of individuals prosecuted should not be confused with conservatism in the charges leveled. The Prosecutor is anything but conservative in his charges of genocide.

    It is ridiculous to allege that we propose “no solution other than to let even the world’s worst atrocities continue.” We do not oppose ICC justice in Darfur — only for the president, now — and have both been involved in a number of practical initiatives to help resolve problems in Darfur.

    Is this the best defence Prof. Moreno Ocampo’s devotees can offer?

  3. Michael Kevane 21 July, 2009 at 16:52

    Alex and Julie,

    In the spirit of continuing the substantive discussion, rather than the character discussion (which is tawdry, no?) I would like to ask you to re-state your objections to the indictment (arrest warrant) against al-Bashir. You say, “We do not oppose ICC justice in Darfur — only for the president, now.” It would be nice also to leave aside in this discussion the issue of the genocide charges, since the consequences in terms of legal reasoning and precedent of having al-Bashir be tried for genocide for what happened in Darfur is I think not essential to what, as you have stated many times, are the quite significant enough crimes of war and crimes against humanity.

    My understanding at the time (last March) was that you thought it would completely derail the peace process and possibly lead to enormous human suffering if al-Bashir “angrily” retaliated at the affront to his honor (I think that is how you characterized it). It seems neither has happened to the degree predicted. If anything, the peace processes (CPA and Darfur) are on better tracks than they were before the arrest warrant (we shall see tomorrow with Abyei), and even with the charade of expulsion and readmittance and non-readmittance of aid groups, the increase in suffering, while evidently quite real to those who suffer, has neither affected policymakers and media (chastened perhaps by the joint Mamdani-de Waal offensive) nor IDP community organizers (no large movements or protests seem to have emerged).

    Since your objections to the arrest warrant were largely consequentialist, and those consequences have not emerged, have you rethought your position? I would be the first to say that the arrest warrant complicates the various processes, but a “non-arrest warrant” situation (help in reserve like a secret hammer?) would also have complicated things. So I am not sure there is much basis to make judgments on the action.

    My own position is that the ICC as a quasi-independent judiciary once established has a logic that is certainly quirky, but not self-evidently negative, and hard to say how it could be improved upon given was the ICC actually is (a court established by a treaty, with lots of rules spelled out in the treaty), and the division among African countries (and I’ll stand with Botswana any day on this, rather than Zimbabwe and Libya and all the others!) over ICC suggests that many people value the steps being taken towards an end to impunity, as complements to local/national struggles for establishment of robust, genuine, rule of law/human rights/civil freedoms etc.

    I am not sure that there is any basis to have a great objection to the arrest warrant against al-Bashir “now”. Sure one can object, but when objecting one should perhaps be clear that one is objecting because of a “gut” feeling rather than because one’s status as an expert means one has some secret knowledge or insight that others cannot access, and so one’s objection should have more standing than other’s “embrace” of the arrest warrant “now”.

    Lastly, I take it that you think the arrest warrants against Ahmed Haroun and Ali Kushayb were good actions (otherwise do you mean something else when you say you “do not oppose ICC justice in Darfur”). When people ask you, “Why aren’t they in jail?” I presume you give the reasonable person’s explanation of the limits of the ICC, the power of the Khartoum regime to protect its own, the low likelihood of outside intervention, and hence the likelihood of delay, perhaps until after 2011… and the same reasoning applies to al-Bashir, no?

    Michael

  4. Beshir Gedda 22 July, 2009 at 21:50

    Dear Michael

    A public figure who attempts to make himself bigger than the institution he purportedly serves is fair game for any criticism. Terming it “character assassination” is a slur. I watched the PBS program “The Reckoning” with deepening dismay. The filmmaker’s draw dropped in awe at Luis Moreno-Ocampo the beginning and nary a critical note crept in. The best review was posted on “Wronging Rights” (http://wrongingrights.blogspot.com/2009/07/whos-down-with-otp.html) and concluded with reference to the husband of the co-blogger, “who initially found it ‘quite balanced, in that it wasn’t only good stuff about the court,’ but revised that assessment upon discovering that it was not actually an OTP recruitment video.”

  5. Michael Kevane 23 July, 2009 at 14:56

    Beshir,

    That’s fine, maybe I shouldn’t say “character assassination” if it is really true assessment of his character (which I certainly have no way of assessing). But my question/comment was not about the character of Moreno-Ocampo, but rather about the changing assessment of the arrest warrant. Alex often urges his interlocutors (well, maybe just Reeves) to “change with the times”… so that is what prompted my comment. I’d like to update my own view too, if there is a good reason to!

    Michael

  6. Alex de Waal 26 July, 2009 at 18:46

    Michael

    I am going to defer a proper answer to your question until September. But in the meantime, it is worth noting that there was at least one ‘angry’ response, namely the expulsion of the NGOs. As it happens, the consequences of that were nowhere near as severe as was feared. It is also worth noting that several of the major players–notably the AU and the US–have not supported the ICC indictment, which has of course altered the dynamics.

    Alex

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Politics

    Why William Ruto must go to The Hague for his own trial – Eugí¨ne Bakama Bope

  • COP27 takes places in Egypt from 6-18 November. Credit: Jeffrey Barbee/Thomson Reuters Foundation.
    Climate crisisTop story

    COP27: It’s Africa’s time to lead

  • Politics

    Rwanda Twenty Years On: The Dangers of Demography – By Mark Weston

Subscribe to our newsletter

Click here to subscribe to our free weekly newsletter and never miss a thing!

  • 81.7K+
    Followers

Find us on Facebook

Interactive Elections Map

Keep up to date with all the African elections.

Recent Posts

  • Crisis in Lasanod: Border Disputes, Escalating Insecurity and the Future of Somaliland
  • Oligarchs, Oil and Obi-dients: The battle for the soul of Nigeria
  • Of cobblers, colonialism, and choices
  • Blackness, Pan-African Consciousness and Women’s Political Organising through the Magazine AWA
  • “People want to be rich overnight”: Nigeria logging abounds despite ban

Editor’s Picks

Editor's PicksSociety

The solvable health issue that kills more than malaria, AIDS and TB

In most African countries, quality surgery is only for the rich. For decades, global health donors have understandably prioritised infectious diseases like malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV/AIDS in their efforts to ...
  • diversity

    “Our African colleagues”: On the limits of diversity in development

    By Faten Aggad
    July 21, 2020
  • Mahamat Déby, Chairman of the Transitional Military Council and President of Chad on an official visit to Rwanda in March 2022. Credit: Paul Kagame.

    Chad’s transition to nowhere

    By Ine Van Severan & David Kode
    July 20, 2022
  • Asian-African

    It’s time to confront anti-Blackness in Asian-African communities

    By Sabrina Mahtani
    August 5, 2020
  • Malawi’s miracle island, where fish remain plentiful despite climate crisis

    By Charles Pensulo
    April 28, 2021

Brought to you by


Creative Commons

Creative Commons Licence
Articles on African Arguments are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
  • Cookies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • en English
    am Amharicar Arabicny Chichewazh-CN Chinese (Simplified)en Englishfr Frenchde Germanha Hausait Italianpt Portuguesest Sesothosn Shonaes Spanishsw Swahilixh Xhosayo Yorubazu Zulu
© Copyright African Arguments 2020
By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our use of cookies.
en English
am Amharicar Arabicny Chichewazh-CN Chinese (Simplified)en Englishfr Frenchde Germanha Hausait Italianpt Portuguesest Sesothosn Shonaes Spanishsw Swahilixh Xhosayo Yorubazu Zulu