African Arguments

Top Menu

  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Climate
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • Think African [Podcast]
    • #EndSARS
    • Into Africa [Podcast]
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Africa Science Focus [Podcast]
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Debating Ideas
  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

logo

African Arguments

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Climate
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • Think African [Podcast]
    • #EndSARS
    • Into Africa [Podcast]
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Africa Science Focus [Podcast]
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Debating Ideas
Politics
Home›African Arguments›Politics›AIDS and Peacekeepers: Reason for Good Policy, Not Fear

AIDS and Peacekeepers: Reason for Good Policy, Not Fear

By Alex de Waal
August 9, 2009
1725
0

In the early days of AMIS deployment, the Sudan government raised fears that peacekeepers from sub-Saharan Africa would be bringing HIV/AIDS into Darfur, and talked about screening incoming troops for HIV. At the time, Khartoum was opposed to increasing the AU peacekeeping presence, and these statements must be interpreted in that light. Nonetheless, there are genuine concerns over HIV/AIDS and international peacekeeping operations, including the fear that peacekeepers living with HIV may fall sick while on peacekeeping duty, or may transmit the virus to local people.

A recent article, drawing upon evidence about HIV prevalence, the HIV policies of troop-contributing countries, and modeling of transmission risks, suggests that the likelihood of peacekeeping troops contributing to HIV epidemics in host countries is very low. (Massimo Lowicki-Zucca, Sarah Karmin and Karl-Lorenz Dehne, “˜HIV among Peacekeepers and its Likely Impact on Prevalence on Host Countries’ HIV Epidemics,’ International Peacekeeping, 1743-906X, 16.3, 2009, 352-363.)

The authors’ argument has the following steps. First, fear that peacekeepers posed a public health risk was founded upon unfounded scares about ultra-high levels of HIV in African militaries. In fact, HIV prevalence in soldiers is often not dissimilar to their civilian peers. Of the 15 top troop-contributing countries, only two (Nigeria and South Africa) have HIV prevalence above 3%. Thus they are a small proportion of the overall number of people living with HIV in the host country.

Sudan has an estimated HIV prevalence of 1.4%. If the peacekeepers in UNMIS and UNAMID have HIV rates equivalent to the population prevalence in their countries of origin, between them they will have 483 HIV positive members (343 among 9,200 UNAMID troops, 140 among 9,950 UNMIS), just 0.17% of the estimated number of people living with HIV in Sudan. The proportion of UNAMID soldiers with HIV to the population of Darfur will be higher but still small””about 0.9% assuming Darfur’s HIV prevalence is the same as the national average. If we take a hypothetical worst-case scenario in which 26,000 UNAMID troops have an HIV rate four times as high as their national average, then there would be 3,877 HIV positive UNAMID troops, 7% of the total number of people living with HIV in Darfur. That would represent a significant contribution to Darfur’s HIV epidemic as well as a considerable medical burden on UNAMID’s already-stretched logistical capabilities.

Fortunately this is only a hypothetical projection–the reality is much less worrying.

To understand why this is so, the authors’ second point is important. They argue that in many cases HIV rates among militaries are in fact lower than the national average. Senegal and Ethiopia are examples. In addition, most troop-contributing countries test for HIV prior to deployment and do not send HIV positive soldiers on peacekeeping missions. So the figures given above are certainly overestimates.

Among the countries that undertake mandatory pre-deployment testing for HIV are Ethiopia, Nigeria, Rwanda and South Africa (though in May 2008 the South African courts ruled the policy an unconstitutional violation of soldiers’ rights to non-discrimination). Nigeria undertakes pre-deployment testing and does not deploy HIV positive soldiers if the host country so requests. The countries that contribute the vast majority of UNAMID’s troops are systematically screening out anyone who tests HIV positive.

Mandatory HIV testing and exclusion of those found positive is widely seen as a violation of individual human rights which does not bring appreciable public health benefits. International guidelines are strongly against it. However, the UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations and the African Union give troop-contributing countries the discretion to apply their own policies as they see fit. The case of UNAMID troop contributors may be a counter-example in which the international norm that opposes mandatory testing is less appropriate than the de facto practice of screening out soldiers who are HIV positive.

Third, there is the concern that even if the vast majority of peacekeepers are uninfected on deployment, they may become HIV positive while on mission, primarily through unsafe sexual practices. In this regard, after UN Security Council Resolution 1308 (July 2000) required UN peacekeeping operations to adopt strict HIV guidelines, and UN missions have taken on HIV/AIDS advisers and established close working relations with UNAIDS, all peacekeepers are provided with HIV counseling, testing, training and sensitization, as well as provision of condoms. These policies are implemented for the two international missions in Sudan.

Even though there is little reason to fear international peacekeepers contributing to an HIV epidemic in Sudan, this is no reason for complacency. HIV/AIDS programs among peacekeepers along with zero tolerance policies prohibiting sexual abuse and exploitation, remain important. The international agencies working on this issue, including UNAIDS and UNFPA, should be given every support.

Previous Article

Scramble for Africa: Darfur Intervention and the ...

Next Article

Challenges facing Kenya: decreeing and establishing a ...

mm

Alex de Waal

Alex de Waal is Research Professor and Executive Director of the World Peace Foundation at The Fletcher School, Tufts University. He was the founding editor of the African Arguments book series. He is the author of The Real Politics of the Horn of Africa: Money, War and the Business of Power.

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Deputy President William Ruto on the campaign trail. Credit: William Samoei Ruto.
    KenyaPoliticsTop story

    Three reasons ethnicity will count for less in Kenya’s upcoming vote

  • Politics

    Somalia’s Parallel Armies – By Liban Ahmad

  • Students in Hargeisa, capital of Somaliland. Credit: Teresa Krug.
    PoliticsSomaliland

    Somaliland: Why we should be at the Commonwealth summit

Subscribe to our newsletter

Click here to subscribe to our free weekly newsletter and never miss a thing!

  • 81.7K+
    Followers

Find us on Facebook

Interactive Elections Map

Keep up to date with all the African elections.

Recent Posts

  • Afrobeats: The birth of Afro-Adura
  • Sudan: How the generals disappeared the people on the way to the economy
  • Is a Peaceful Somalia Possible? Alternatives to Total War on Al-Shabaab
  • “Economic bondage”: E Africa farmers worry over what GMOs might mean
  • The unexpected success of Somalia’s new fight against Al Shabaab

Editor’s Picks

Editor's PicksPoliticsZambia

An assessment of President Hichilema’s first year in Zambia

The new president came to power promising widespread change. A year on, his supporters see him as a saviour, his critics as an abject failure. Nothing demonstrates Zambia’s political polarisation ...
  • A forgotten community: The little town in Niger keeping the lights on in France

    By Lucas Destrijcker & Mahadi Diouara
    July 18, 2017
  • Africa coronavirus covid A woman in Mali wearing a mask. Credit: Photo: World Bank / Ousmane Traore.

    Africans don’t just live to die. A response to the New York Times.

    By Mamka Anyona
    January 8, 2021
  • Chad: The bed Déby made

    By Helga Dickow
    April 22, 2021
  • Karrayyu in Ethiopia dig a mass grave for the massacred Gadaa leaders. Credit: Nuredin Jilo.

    Ethiopia’s forgotten minority: Who will be the voice for Karrayyu?

    By Roba Bulga Jilo
    March 31, 2022

Brought to you by


Creative Commons

Creative Commons Licence
Articles on African Arguments are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
  • Cookies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© Copyright African Arguments 2020
By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our use of cookies.