African Arguments

Top Menu

  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Climate
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • Think African [Podcast]
    • #EndSARS
    • Into Africa [Podcast]
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Africa Science Focus [Podcast]
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Debating Ideas
  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

logo

African Arguments

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Climate
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • Think African [Podcast]
    • #EndSARS
    • Into Africa [Podcast]
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Africa Science Focus [Podcast]
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Debating Ideas
Politics
Home›African Arguments›Politics›The Kimberley Process and diamond demand – by Jolyon Ford at Oxford Analytica

The Kimberley Process and diamond demand – by Jolyon Ford at Oxford Analytica

By Uncategorised
December 5, 2011
2078
0

The research and advocacy group Global Witness focuses on conflict and corruption involved in natural resources sectors. It has now announced that it intends quitting the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme intended to prevent “˜conflict’ or “˜blood’ diamonds flowing into global supply chains.

The withdrawal was not unforeseen. Civil society groups boycotted the KP’s most recent plenary meeting and reacted strongly to its early November decision to allow the resumption of certified diamond exports from Zimbabwe. Some civil society groups expressed doubts about the prospects for new monitoring mechanisms proposed for that country.

The November move raised two main issues beyond the role of diamond revenues in Zimbabwe’s own political economy. The first relates to the future of the KP itself, and how the health of the KP relates to the industry it regulates. Civil society groups are – along with governments and the diamond industry – one of the scheme’s three legs. Without the participation of the civil society coalition, the KP’s ability to fulfil its purpose – reassuring buyers about the social and security context in which a stone was extracted – will be undermined. Will its credibility survive without civil society groups like Global Witness re-engaging in 2012? Is the KP “˜stronger’ for having compromised (so preserving unity) or “˜weaker’ for having done so? What prospects are there for a “˜KP-Plus’ – or what alternative scheme(s) might emerge? How will the World Diamond Council’s members reconcile their position with groups such as Responsible Jewellery Council? What would the impact be on consumers in the West if the KP fails to reconcile – and will a weaker KP have the same effect on traders and consumers in the Middle East, India, China and elsewhere?

The November plenary saw the United States elected to the KP’s rotating chair. Previously opposed to re-admitting Zimbabwe exports, its concessions at the plenary can be understood as having ensured that the scheme remains intact. Civil society groups will probably base their 2012 strategies on whether they see any prospects for Washington using its chair to introduce and implement reforms to the KP.

The second issue is broader than the KP. What do the problems of collective action attending the KP mean for other broad or sector-specific multi-stakeholder mechanisms designed to mitigate social harms relating to natural resource development? The KP was seen as the flagship in a new generation of hybrid regulatory efforts. The progress it produced and promised cannot necessarily be translated into sectors dealing with other minerals; on the other hand, problems or even collapse of the KP do not mean that other industry-supported schemes are doomed.

Jolyon Ford is a senior analyst at Oxford Analytica, the global analysis and advisory firm.

Previous Article

Welcome to ‘Diaspora Debate’

Next Article

The Gambia’s Presidential Election: Jammeh consolidates hold ...

Uncategorised

0 comments

  1. Global Witness leaves Kimberley Process, calls for diamond trade accountability « 7 December, 2011 at 22:43

    […] Ford , a senior analyst at Oxford Analytica, the global analysis and advisory firm, writes in African Arguments that the November plenary saw the United States elected to the KP’s rotating chair. […]

  2. Martyn Marriott 8 December, 2011 at 14:13

    The one great achievement of the KP is its certificate. Every export and import of rough diamonds has to have one. That certificate gives the country of origin of the diamonds. Subsequent processors and sellers currently require guarantees that the original rough was properly certified. It would not need much to extend this to specifying the country of origin down line. In this way consumers could choose whether or not to buy diamonds from specific countries – Angola, Botswana, the Congo, Sierra Leone, Zimbabwe, etc. – or possibly producers – De Beers, Rio Tinto, BHP, etc. Alternatively a down stream certificate might be produced that specified that the diamonds did not come from any KP non fully compliant source.

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Politics

    No longer at ease: clouds on the horizon for Botswana’s conservation success story – By Keith Somerville

  • African ArgumentsAfrican VoicesDebating IdeasEritreaEthiopiaWar and War Crimes

    “They Have Destroyed Tigray, Literally”: Mulugeta Gebrehiwot Speaks from the Mountains of Tigray

  • Politics

    REVIEW: Séverine Autesserre’s ‘Peaceland: Conflict Resolution and the Everyday Politics of International Intervention’ – By Michael Deibert

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter


  • 81.7K+
    Followers

Find us on Facebook

Interactive Elections Map

Keep up to date with all the African elections.

Recent Posts

  • We’ve already breached most of the Earth’s limits. How can we get back?
  • Africa’s topsy-turvy food paradox
  • Zambia: The president’s five-point plan to stay in power at all costs
  • The two defining challenges facing South Africa
  • ‘Don’t Agonize, Organize!’ Remembering Tajudeen Abdul-Raheem’s Advocacy on Sudan

Editor’s Picks

Editor's PicksEthiopiaSociety

As a Tigrayan, my bond with Ethiopia feels beyond repair

We’re told the war is not with ordinary Tigrayans. Yet as thousands suffer and our compatriots remain silent, that’s how it feels. As a child growing up in the then ...
  • If you believe you are a citizen of the world…

    By James Wan
    November 6, 2019
  • A snapshot from NTV's coverage of Daniel arap Moi's funeral on 11 February.

    The performance of mourning Moi

    By Isaac Otidi Amuke
    February 12, 2020
  • What is the legacy of #EndSARS?

    By Zainab Onuh-Yahaya
    November 23, 2021
  • President Hakainde Hichilema visiting the IMF in New York in September 2022. Credit: IMF Photo/Kim Haughton.

    Why Zambia’s president is adored abroad but a disappointment at home

    By Sishuwa Sishuwa
    December 16, 2022

Brought to you by


Creative Commons

Creative Commons Licence
Articles on African Arguments are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
  • Cookies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© Copyright African Arguments 2020
By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our use of cookies.