African Arguments

Top Menu

  • About Us
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
    • Climate crisis
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • #EndSARS
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Podcast
    • Into Africa Podcast
    • Africa Science Focus Podcast
    • Think African Podcast
  • Debating Ideas
  • About Us
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

logo

Header Banner

African Arguments

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
    • Climate crisis
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • #EndSARS
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Podcast
    • Into Africa Podcast
    • Africa Science Focus Podcast
    • Think African Podcast
  • Debating Ideas
Politics

South Africa’s ‘nationalistion’ debate – By Jolyon Ford, Oxford Analytica

By Uncategorised
January 6, 2012
2287
0
Share:

Julius Malema has been at the noisy forefront of South Africa’s pro-nationalisation debate

For those in the risk analysis game, much of 2011 in South Africa was dominated by the ANC Youth League’s call for nationalisation of mines (a 60 percent state stake) and expropriation of farms. Indeed, the year ended with the ANC Limpopo provincial electoral conference adopting a declaration supporting the League’s position on nationalisation, although the conference outcome must be understood in the light of factional and provincial ANC politics.

The ANC’s senior leadership received in November the comparative experts’ report that it commissioned in 2010 into options for increasing the state’s role in mining. Now, there is very little likelihood that the national ANC policy machinery would embrace anything like a ‘nationalisation’ policy. But this leaves the situation open to any alternative that might emerge from the party’s national policy conference in June.

We have been working with clients on the report’s recommendations and a range of likely scenarios, but a blog entry isn’t the place for such things, or the place to outline all aspects of the debate. Nor is it necessary to explain how for all its resonance with many South Africans, the debate has, in part, represented a means of contestation within the ANC over leadership, a vehicle for factionalism, rather than a policy debate pure and simple. Instead, one interesting dimension to the debate is how expressions of support for “˜nationalisation’ encompass a range of potential policy preferences. This is one problem with the “˜MixIt’ survey conducted last year, which asked South Africans to express their approval or disapproval of the idea.

The open content of the idea is also apparent in the position of COSATU. The union federation in August expressed a commitment to “˜nationalisation’ (partly to avoid being outflanked on the left by the League), but carefully refrained from giving its position any substance. This is unsurprising – union unity in South Africa is routinely assumed and exaggerated; for quite understandable reasons there is considerable division within COSATU affiliates about the merits of nationalisation policies or talk.

The broad range of aspirations, grievances and ideas possibly captured by the “˜nationalisation’ debate means that there remains a great deal of scope still to shape that debate and the expectations it engenders or represents. Cabinet members have hardly exhausted the space available to them to show how nationalisation would frustrate rather than promote poverty-alleviation and economic empowerment, and to provide a credible and viable alternative narrative. In this sense, the panic and pessimism evident in some analysis of South Africa is unwarranted.

For its part, big business knows it must be wary about the ways in which it enters the debate, but is in a position to help shape what counts as transformation and economic empowerment. Business unity will remain at a premium in 2012, as will the need for compelling ways to demonstrate how it remains possible to reconcile social expectations with business realities.

The nationalisation debate is unlikely to evaporate entirely, and considerable discussion of the idea (however expressed) can be expected in 2012 throughout ANC alliance sub-structures. Despite the obvious harm the prolonged debate does to investor confidence, it is also possible to see it as healthy, at least where it leads to dealing more resolutely with the elephant in the room of the country’s political economy. Moreover, while SA is a unique setting, situations where the state takes a greater role in the mining sector may be received as compounding political risk for investors, but this is not necessarily so. A greater state role in a project can protect it from demands made in the longer term, as I’ve argued elsewhere.

As Youth League leader, Julius Malema’s “˜nationalisation’ ideas have some popular resonance given frustration over the pace and nature of the economic empowerment long-promised by the ANC and vital to the viability of South Africa’s social contract. To paraphrase Bobby Godsell, Malema has given some poor answers to some excellent questions about SA’s future. But it should be remembered that the League’s October march on the Chamber of Mines attracted a crowd that was miniscule compared with what history shows South Africa’s public is capable of when it really believes in an issue.

This too suggests that for now there remains considerable scope for the country’s political and business leadership to articulate a popularly credible and economically viable national vision for wealth creation and distribution. It will probably not be enough to point out how obviously ruinous nationalisation would be without understanding that such things are not necessarily obvious to many of the country’s youth, which needs to be persuaded of the merits of alternative paths, and is still open to being so persuaded.

Jolyon Ford is a senior analyst at Oxford Analytica, the global analysis and advisory firm.

Previous Article

South Africa: A hundred years after its ...

Next Article

Nigeria: scrapping fuel subsidy ‘ill-timed’ – By ...

Uncategorised

Leave a reply Cancel reply

  • A textile factory in Lesotho. Credit: John Hogg.
    EconomyEditor's Picks

    Leapfrogging is only so good. Africa needs to make things.

  • Dr Stella Nyanzi at a human rights conference in 2018. Credit: Chapter Four Uganda.
    Editor's PicksPoliticsSocietyUganda

    Stella Nyanzi: The rude vagina-poem-writing hero Uganda needs

  • #EndSARSNigeriaPolitics

    #EndSARS: It’s time for the diaspora to pick up the shift

Subscribe to our newsletter

Click here to subscribe to our free weekly newsletter and never miss a thing!

  • 81664
    Followers

Find us on Facebook

Interactive Elections Map

Keep up to date with all the African elections.

Popular articles

  • “Too much propaganda”: Zimbabwe’s pirates of the airwaves look to SA

  • Tunisia's President Kais Saied meeting with then US Defense Secretary Mark Esper at Carthage Palace, Tunisia, in September 2020. Credit: DoD/Lisa Ferdinando.

    Is Tunisia’s democracy slipping away?

  • Typical coping strategies such as a nomadic lifestyle are inadequate to handle what is potentially the worst food crisis in Somalia's recent past. Credit: UNDP Somalia.

    Somalia faces worst humanitarian crisis in recent history

  • Students graduating from Babcock University, Ilishan-Remo, Nigeria. Credit: Rajmund Dabrowski/ANN.

    “We copy it from them”: How campus politics sets scene for big man politics

  • #StopEACOP TotalEnergies Uganda Tanzania

    The bold campaign to defund the East African Crude Oil Pipeline

Brought to you by


Creative Commons

Creative Commons Licence
Articles on African Arguments are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
  • Cookies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • en English
    am Amharicar Arabicny Chichewazh-CN Chinese (Simplified)en Englishfr Frenchde Germanha Hausait Italianpt Portuguesest Sesothosn Shonaes Spanishsw Swahilixh Xhosayo Yorubazu Zulu
© Copyright African Arguments 2020
Cleantalk Pixel
By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
en English
am Amharicar Arabicny Chichewazh-CN Chinese (Simplified)en Englishfr Frenchde Germanha Hausait Italianpt Portuguesest Sesothosn Shonaes Spanishsw Swahilixh Xhosayo Yorubazu Zulu
African Arguments wants to hear from you!

Take 5 minutes to fill in this short reader survey and you could win three African Arguments books of your choice…as well as our eternal gratitude.