Djibouti’s strongman president faces strongest cross-examination of his career
Ismail Omar Guelleh will be the first African president to appear as a witness in a UK corruption case. But this trial of intrigue is just one of many challenges facing the 16-year president.
For the first time in history, a sitting African president will be summoned to give evidence in person before the British High Court. Ismail Omar Guelleh, the long-standing president of Djibouti is set to travel to London next month to testify in a long drawn-out trial involving his millionaire compatriot, former ally and now rival Abdourahman Boreh.
A former presidential candidate, Boreh was accused of terrorism, saw his worldwide assets frozen and was sentenced to 15 years in prison in 2009 by a Djiboutian court. However, that decision, made in absentia, was later overturned after the British court deemed the trial politically motivated.
A spectacular round two is now set to start after Justice Flaux insisted that Guelleh must give personal testimony in court and set the record straight given that the case against Boreh is based almost entirely on oral evidence.
16 years into his presidency of Djibouti, Guelleh faces the dubious honour of being the first African president to appear as a witness in a UK corruption case. But while this legal battle between two Djiboutian bigwigs and former allies looks set to heat up in the following months, the dramatic international case is not the only headache on the horizon for the president.
Guelleh has long been engaged in a delicate balancing act in his rule of Djibouti, and it will require the deftest of political touches for him to continue on this road.
Economic boom, humanitarian bust
Ismail Omar Guelleh, now 67, has been president of Djibouti since 1999, after he was handpicked by his predecessor and uncle, Hassan Gouled Aptidon, to succeed him after 22 years in power. Guelleh quickly established members of his Issa clan in key governmental positions and positioned himself strategically to oversee political operations. Indeed, a Wikileaks cable from 2004 describes Djibouti as “less a country than a commercial city state controlled by one man, Ismail Omar Guelleh.”
Under his watch, Djibouti has seen healthy economic growth, driven by Guelleh’s outwards-looking approach, which has helped the pin-sized East African country punch well above its weight internationally.
In particular, Djibouti has benefitted from its geostrategic positioning on the Horn of Africa and plays host to several foreign armies. France and Japan each pay $30 million per year to rent out military real estate, while the US doles out $67 million for its 500-acre Camp Lemonnier, its only official permanent base on the continent. Beijing is also now looking to get in on the action with Djibouti poised to become the first in the world to host a Chinese overseas military base. Guelleh announced in May that he is in talks with Beijing to open a bricks and mortar installation in the northern Obock region, which, according to reports, will house 10,000 Chinese troops at a yearly cost of $100 million.
Djibouti is also hoping to further capitalise commercially on its strategic position at the juncture of various busy international shipping routes. The country already generates significant revenues from its port and is looking to become a key East African hub – or Africa’s “Singapore“ or “Dubai“ in the words of Saad Omar Guelleh, the manager of the Port of Djibouti and half-brother of the president.
This ambition has not been plain sailing, with a number of international companies abandoning the country in recent years due to a mixture of court cases and political difficulties. For instance, Total, Mobil and Shell have all abandoned their oil interests in recent years, with other major multinationals packing up too. However, a number of Chinese companies have become heavily involved in their wake, seeing Djibouti as a crucial node in Beijing’s ambitious and globe-trotting “One Belt, One Road” (OBOR) initiative. No fewer than 14 infrastructure projects, mostly financed with Chinese money, are now in the works in Djibouti.
However, not all that glitters is gold, and an economic boom under Guelleh has been accompanied by a humanitarian bust. While the country’s GDP has doubled over the past decade and is expected to grow at more than 4% per annum going forwards, entrenched corruption and venal office holding have robbed the average Djiboutian from seeing much improvement in their standard of living.
A 2014 report issued by the UN paints a bleak picture: less than half the population enjoys access to electricity, a figure that has budged by a meagre 2.4% over the past decade; hunger is widespread, with the percentage of malnourished children having grown since 2006; meanwhile, access to improved sanitation facilities slightly shrunk from 61.5% to 61.3% between 2005 and 2011.
Politically-speaking, Djiboutians have also faced tumultuous times as Guelleh has tried to maintain his grip on power. The government has been accused of human rights abuses, while both Cuba and Yemen can boast having a freer press than the repressive Djibouti. One illustrative example is that of Maydaneh Abdallah Okieh, the owner of the first independent radio station in the country, who has been jailed three times in the last few years, including a six month sentence for posting photos on Facebook that showed police breaking up a protest.
Guelleh has also gone to great lengths to extend his term in office. It took a controversial constitutional amendment to allow him to run for a third time in the 2011 elections, which he won in a landslide after the opposition boycotted the contest. When 6,000 people participated at a rally denouncing his cling on power with banners reading “IOG out”, riot police moved in and in the chaotic tear-gassed atmosphere, five lost their lives, dozens more were wounded, and large numbers were arrested. At the time, Guelleh promised he wouldn’t run for a fourth term when the April 2016 elections come round, but he has since refused to restate his intentions unambiguously.
Meanwhile, a political agreement with the leading opposition party, the Union of National Salvation (USN), that was clinched in December 2014 after 18 gruelling months of negotiations is now at a deadlock.
The agreed document outlined a roadmap to the 2016 elections and included an amnesty for opposition members, a rapid reform of the Electoral Commission, and an immediate halt to “all acts that could lead to tense situations between public authorities and opposition activists”. But the words never left the paper – a Djiboutian human rights observatory has since documented multiple instances of arbitrary arrests, illegal detentions, and kidnappings of opposition members. In better news though, the spokesperson of the USN, Daher Ahmed Farah, a widely admired soft-spoken former journalist, has finally been allowed to return to Djibouti after being illegally imprisoned some 20 times over the years.
Feeling cheated by illusory promises of democratic change, FRUD, a politico-military movement, renewed a military offensive in April near Obock, in the north, drawing Djibouti’s military into the fray and raising fears of a rekindling of the country’s bloody civil war of 1993.
Looking to 2016
It is against this complex background that the Boreh trial is being held. It will take place thousands of miles away in London, but its outcome could be a serious political challenges to the Guelleh regime.
By using his country’s strategic position as a bargaining chip, Guelleh has managed to cobble together the international support needed to maintain his hold on power. Bringing China into the fold was a further political masterstroke, meaning that even if Western partners back out, Djibouti can still rely on Beijing’s financial and political support.
But with no real talk of a political transition in sight domestically, the possibility of strong resistance and potential violence when the 2016 elections come around is rising. After all, barring a point-for-point implementation of the December accord, the opposition cannot hope to break through in the elections and bring about Djibouti’s first democratic transition in 40 years. Furthermore, with rumours that Eritrea is bankrolling the fighting in the north, post-election violence could spin out of control.
As such, implementing the accord might be the lesser of two evils for the troubled Guelleh regime and could result in a semblance of stable governance. Because as it is, Djibouti’s elite may be well reach their ambitions of becoming Africa’s Dubai – but only if they are measuring the comparison in terms of a dismal human rights record and lack of democratic credentials.
Malik Ibrahim is a risk analyst working on political and security issues primarily in the MENA region. He is a contributor to Middle East Monitor and Eurasia Review.
To mr Malik ibrahim,
Djibouti is a peacelfull country and as u aware most its neighbour are on fire.
It is unfair to say that most of post in Djibouti are occupied by the Issa clan, there are othet tribe in Djibouti. I would say most Issa have got nothing so stop writing false statement, just because the president is Issa doesnt mean all his clan are in, nonesense. 38 years of independance and peace by dictatorship or any other means but Djibouti has always been safe and still is. We have our way of dealing problem our own policy, keep your westernised policy to yourself.
We have got our own democracy LE XEER ISSA whether u liked or not and it does work.
Djibouti pays des braves
Wont allow Djibouti to be on fire.
I do not agree with djibrave he is talking about a palm tree justice which has never worked in the issa tribe.
the peace we have only suites the regime the population are not benefiting from this so called peace. unless there is respect for the rule of law there will be no peace.
Most of things mentioned in the article are true. However when you say the Issa clan has benefited from the regime you are dead wrong. The majority of the people who are against the region with different political parties are the Issa themselves as well as the Afars and other tribes of Djibouti. The people as a people are not part of the click who got rich in the improvised country. Off course there are people in the ruling click who are Issa, affars and other tribes of Djibouti who benefited from the regime but they are in the minority as everyone knows. So please stop making a sweeping statements which i have also seen in other journalist which is not a fact in the ground. Having said to be fair to the Djiboutian regime I say that its dictatorship is much lighter than other African dictatorships. What i mean by that is it’s level harassment,, killing and torturing citizens pale comparing to other African dictators. it is much more mild form of dictatorship because the people are very close to each other and have similar cultures which diffuses many tensions. However dictatorship is a dictatorship at the end.
Democracy is not fit for purpose in Africa, nevertheless Djibouti could become a hub like Dubai or Singapore if there’s willingness to success and overcome poverty by empowering their citizen as human capital throughout entrepreneurship.
As Djibouti has become the gateway of Ethiopia and Horn of African due to geopolitical strategy in terms of stability and friendly people with full of diversity, Djibouti has got a potential opportunity this era but the time will tell the truth.
If Djibouti can eradicate the poverty level, reduce unemployment and maintain a good governance, increase private sector it does have a health future, also needs to focus how to reply adequately the needs of 250 millions neighbors in terms of infrastructure such telecommunications (Internet) transport (land, Air and sea).
As we all aware there’s mismanagement of resources especially corruption, and a tiny minority benefited out of this no doubt.
if i am right Djibouti population is less 1 million based on UN report obviously the sheer amount of income generated throughout port, airport, foreign military bases wouldn’t be enough to everyone if it’s properly managed.
I would say surely there’s something wrong and it has to be fixed in peaceful manner throughout political stability, honest leadership, fair distribution of wealth, strong educational system, access for employment and health and so on.
if 70% out of population are active in employment and private section is quite substantial it looks good for Djibouti but the fact is different.
The road is long and rough but if Djibouti has got a clear vision for 2020 i believe where there’s will there’s a way forward! World Citizen