Zambia’s 2016 elections: is a disputed outcome now inevitable?
A flurry of questionable decisions by the electoral body, media exposés of irregularities, and controversial interventions by the government and military suggests yes
Zambia’s enviable record of 25 years of peaceful democratic elections appears to be under threat. With less than ten weeks to go before the country goes to the polls on 11 August, several disturbing irregularities in the electoral process are emerging.
The controversial decision by the Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ) to award the contract to print the ballot papers to a previously unknown Dubai-based firm, the questionable appointment of unqualified allies of President Edgar Lungu to the Constitutional Court, the suspiciously hurried enactment of legislation conferring immunity from prosecution on ECZ officials, the registration of allegedly thousands of foreign nationals on the national electoral roll, and the alarming prospects of military interference in the political process, could all undermine popular acceptance of the election results.
The frontrunners in the presidential race are the incumbent Lungu of the governing Patriotic Front (PF), and Hakainde Hichilema of the opposition United Party for National Development (UPND).
[See: Can Zambia’s opposition unseat President Lungu in the 2016 elections?]
Heightening the prospects for a disputed election result and political violence is the growing sense that neither party appears to be countenancing defeat. Over the last few weeks, both the PF and UPND have talked up their chances of winning, and understandably so.
With the PF only having been in power for five years and Lungu for a mere 15 months (following the death in office of predecessor Michael Sata), the administration feels entitled to more time. It has also expressed confidence that Zambians will look favourably on the party’s record and renew its mandate. Likewise, the UPND and Hichilema, who has spent a decade in opposition, are tantalisingly close to power and have voiced their conviction that their long wait for power will soon be over.
Lungu and the PF are desperate to retain power and continue enjoying the accumulation of privilege, while Hichilema and the UPND are determined to secure their turn to do so. The stakes are high and the defeated party’s willingness to accept the electoral results will, to a large extent, be determined by the credibility of the electoral process. However, if recent events are anything to go by, a disputed result appears almost inevitable.
[See: Zambia’s disputed 2016 elections: on claims of binned ballots and “systematic bias”]
ConCourt judges: buddies of the incumbent or fair adjudicators?
In February 2016, President Lungu appointed – as per the revised Constitution of Zambia and subject to parliamentary approval – six nominees to serve as judges on the newly-created Constitutional Court (Concourt). These were: Hildah Chibomba, Margaret Munalula, Mugeni Mulenga, Anne Mwewa-Sitali, Enoch Mulembe and Palan Mulonda.
The ConCourt has the final say on all matters relating to the interpretation of the Constitution including the election of the President. For instance, in the event that an election petition is filed against the President-Elect after elections, the ConCourt has the legal mandate to hear the matter within 14 days of its filing and can dismiss the petition or call for a fresh poll within 30 days. The decision of the ConCourt on any post-election case brought before it is final.
The ConCourt would thus be central to any post-electoral dispute, and opposition parties and civil society have raised concerns that half of the six judges appointed to the Court have close ties to the incumbent. Two were Lungu’s classmates at law school in the 1970s, while a third is a relative who controversially secured Lungu’s nomination to the PF presidency in late-2014 through questionable judicial decisions against his opponents.
These links to the President has led the opposition to claim that the ConCourt will be unlikely to ever rule against Lungu. Yet a more important criticism in fact is that none of the appointed individuals even meet the constitutional requirements to serve as a judge on the ConCourt: namely, specialised training or experience in human rights or constitutional law and 15 years’ experience as a legal practitioner.
When John Sangwa, a prominent Zambian constitutional law expert, wrote to Lungu, pointing out these shortcomings and asking him to reconsider the choice of his nominees, the president ignored him. And thanks to the ruling party’s majority in parliament, all six nominees were ratified. Opposition parties argue that the appointments are part of a calculated strategy aimed at ensuring Lungu receives a favourable hearing should the election results be contested.
We are coming to vote
In December 2015, The Post, the leading private newspaper in the country, reported that ruling party officials were recruiting foreign nationals in border areas of Eastern and Luapula provinces – both of which are PF strongholds – to register as voters in Zambia. The Eastern Province borders Malawi while Luapula shares a border with the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Peter Sukwa, the investigative journalist who exposed the story and attempted to take pictures of PF officials conducting the exercise, was left with fractured ribs and a deaf ear after supporters of the ruling party beat him and urinated on him. It took specialist treatment from the country’s top hospital to save his life. The incident highlighted the rising levels of lawlessness that have characterised much of Lungu’s short, beleaguered term in office.
Undeterred, The Post pursued the story further and in May 2016 published evidence of several Malawians in possession of Zambian identity documents and voters’ cards. A check on the provisional electoral roll using the verification process devised by the ECZ confirmed the appearance of these foreign nationals. Furthermore, in separate interviews with the newspaper, some of the Malawians involved in the scheme testified that they had been mobilised with incentives by Zambian authorities and advised to assume common local names to register as voters in several constituencies of the Eastern Province.
Chisamba, a community leader of Malawi’s Mchinji district, led the testimonies, saying: “We are coming to vote. The PF government helped us get these voting requirements and it is our democratic right…We are all ready to come and vote and…are not afraid because we have been permitted by the Zambian government”.
Amidst unverified reports that up to 500,000 foreign nationals from neighbouring countries are appearing on the voters’ roll, the opposition UPND went to the police this May to report the matter. But the police are yet to make any formal arrests, while the ruling party has dismissed the allegations as an opposition smear campaign against the ECZ.
Exonerating itself, the electoral body itself responded that the issuance of a national registration identity card, the prerequisite for acquiring a voters’ card, is the preserve of the government. The ECZ spokesperson said: “the commission does not register foreigners as voters…the basis for registration is a green national registration card and the assumption is that when a person walks to registration officers with a green national registration card, that means that person is a Zambian…It is the Department of National Registration [a division of the Ministry of Home Affairs] that issues national registration cards.”
Opposition parties have cited both the registration of foreign nationals and the police’s lacklustre response as evidence that the ECZ colluded with the governing authorities to manipulate the elections. How this issue is resolved over the next few weeks will have a crucial bearing on the credibility of the electoral process. Left unaddressed, and in the event of a victory for Lungu, it may spark generalised anger or feed into xenophobic attacks against Congolese, Malawian and other foreign nationals. The opposition may also contest a PF victory on the grounds that it was secured with the illegal help of non-Zambian voters.
Adding to the tension is also the fact that the provisional voters’ roll contains monumental errors. In many instances, people who registered in urban centres have found their registrations moved to rural areas without their consent. And media reports suggest that this has been most common in opposition strongholds.
The scale of the reported anomalies combined with the limited time provided by the ECZ for voters to verify their particulars (slightly over a week) has fed suspicions that there is a systematic attempt at play to minimise the number of opposition supporters able to vote.
The new electoral law: institutionalising wrongdoing?
In early May, the PF took to parliament a hastily arranged bill that proposed far-reaching amendments to legislation on the administration and organisation of elections. Among other things, the bill sought to provide ECZ officials with immunity from prosecution for any decisions taken in exercise of their duties and to criminalise the disclosure or publication of ECZ documents to unauthorised persons. It also proposed allowing the President to sack ECZ commissioners for any reason.
Despite criticism that the changes would place the electoral commission above public accountability and undermine its independence, the bill was passed a few minutes before the dissolution of parliament on 13 May. At the time of writing, the bill has yet to receive presidential assent and the final version may, according to parliamentary sources, have different clauses to those that have been published.
The main opposition parties, led by the UPND, see this new law and its suspicious timing as further evidence that Lungu is preparing the ground for a fixed election. They claim that conferring immunity on ECZ officials is meant to protect those who may facilitate the manipulation of election results, while the classification of ECZ documents is a strategy designed to prevent the media from using, say, parallel vote tabulation to publish election results other than those formally approved.
For their part, the ruling authorities have dismissed these claims as unfounded, arguing that the amendments were meant to enhance the independence of the ECZ and bring its operations into line with the amended national constitution.
Also adding to concerns, Lungu has made several changes to the ECZ leadership, moving the widely respected former chairperson Irene Mambilima to the Supreme Court and appointing Esau Chulu, who had served as Mambilima’s deputy, as her successor. The President further nominated three individuals with effectively no experience in managing national elections as ECZ commissioners. Opposition parties allege that Lungu’s reconstitution of the electoral body on the eve of a crucial election demonstrates his determination to ensure a favourable outcome.
From ballot to bullet? The military’s increasing involvement
On 20 May, the commander of the Zambia Air Force (ZAF) issued a strongly-worded warning that the military would tightly control the use of the “innocent” airspace throughout the campaign period, ostensibly to protect it from abuse.
In remarks that are worth quoting at length, General Eric Chimense said that: “Under the prevailing security conditions today, as Zambia Air Force, we are duty-bound to take stringent measures that would prevent our innocent air space from being used wrongly by the perpetrators of violence within our nation. We as service chiefs are seriously concerned with the carelessness and lack of patriotism, hooliganism and total indiscipline that has been observed over the past few months from some of our citizens…These individuals have been justifying the acts of violence or rather of their followers in the name of retaliation or indeed self-defence…It is a threat that cannot be allowed to continue growing in our society. Some of the perpetrators of genocide we hear being arrested in our sister countries within Africa are because of the statements these individuals made before genocide. We as Zambia are known the world over as peacekeepers. We do not want peacekeepers to come to Zambia.”
Chimese’s public address was generally perceived as a veiled message to the UPND, whose leaders recently advised members to defend themselves against attacks by ruling party supporters in the face of a lack of protection from police. The General’s pledge to protect the airspace meanwhile was seen as a euphemism for justifying the Air Force’s frustrations of the opposition’s electoral campaigns on the flimsy grounds of ensuring security while Lungu is flying across the country. This conclusion is backed by the fact that a few days earlier, UPND leaders had complained to the ECZ that the ZAF command had grounded its campaigns with the party’s airplanes denied clearance to fly.
The remarks by the Air Force commander were thus important for several reasons. First, they are evidence that top military commanders are siding with the governing party. Second, they highlight the increasing involvement of the Zambian military in electoral contests. In the run-up to the January 2015 presidential election, military chiefs reportedly backed Lungu, hitherto the Minister of Defence, in the PF’s divisive succession wrangles. And the ZAF commander’s recent comments provide possible indications of the consolidation of that relationship.
Since ZAF helicopters ordinarily transport election materials to and from rural constituencies before and after voting, Chimese’s remarks may further be interpreted as an early indication that the authorities are preparing the ground for manipulating the election outcome. For instance, if the ZAF choppers are to play a part in rigging the vote, the authorities may be pre-emptively trying to prevent the opposition from collecting evidence of such activities.
Furthermore, the commander’s comments arguably demonstrate an attempt to intimidate the population into submission in the event of a disputed election outcome. And finally, given that the rank and file of the military may retain different political persuasions to their commanders, such remarks also have the potential to divide the security forces and foment protracted civil strife in the event of a disputed election.
Printing papers: a controversial contract
In all this, one of the most worrying developments has been the decision of the ECZ to award the contract to print ballot papers to a previously little-known Dubai-based firm, Al Ghurairi Printing and Publishing. Civil society, the press and opposition parties protested strongly against this decision, claiming that the company printed ballot papers for Uganda’s disputed February 2016 presidential poll. The ECZ denied that Al Ghurairi had any involvement in those elections, though in fact both sides are mistaken. The truth is that the company printed ballot papers for Uganda’s local government elections held alongside the presidential poll.
Regardless, an explanation by the ECZ is still needed, especially since the Dubai-based firm quoted $3.6 million for the contract, which is more than double the amount tendered by the South African company Ren-Form CC, which has printed Zambia’s ballot papers for the last three years, including those for the 2015 presidential by-election. Since 2006, ballot papers for Zambia’s general elections have always been printed in nearby South Africa, raising questions about the change to United Arab Emirates. Claims by the ECZ that Al Ghurairi provides superior security features have not been substantiated.
To the delight of opposition parties, Ren-Form CC subsequently lodged an appeal against the ECZ’s decision to the Zambia Public Procurement Authority (ZPPA), a government regulatory body with the power to review matters relating to public procurement. After careful consideration, the ZPPA advised the ECZ to cancel the award, citing a number of irregularities, and to restart the tender nomination process.
This recommendation drew sharp criticism from the ruling authorities who, according to well-placed sources in ZPPA and ECZ, asked the regulatory body to rescind the decision. A few days later, however, the ECZ confirmed the final award to Al Ghurairi, prompting further accusations that the Dubai-based firm will be involved in efforts to rig the elections.
Hichilema has been resolute in his opposition and warned that if the deal is not cancelled, it might plunge the nation into chaos. Al Ghurairi’s failure to address the complaints of opposition parties has only fed into growing speculation that it is colluding with the ruling authorities to undermine Zambia’s electoral process. It would be astonishing to see a company genuinely seeking to build an international reputation open itself up to such criticism.
The tenacity of ordinary Zambians in resisting provocation and avoiding political violence over the last 30 years has been remarkable. One can only hope that this record endures and that the mounting irregularities around the current elections do not test the patience of the opposition and the general public to breaking point.
Sishuwa Sishuwa is a Zambian political analyst based at the University of Oxford.
What a well articulated article from Sishuwa Sishuwa yet again! Detailed, balanced and authoritative. I am in Zambia and this is an accurate picture of the political scenario. Just yesterday, PF hooligans were terrorizing and stoning other candidates during submission of nominations. The situation is dire in Zambia. If the AU, SADC and international community are waiting to react after August 11, it will be too late.
A mind well indoctrinated by the west!no wonder instead of being here on the ground, writing from a point of knowledge, this boy writes from alleged point of view!he is prophesizing doom and painting whatever is happening here as black, forgetting that he too has a black ass!…take a look at the primaries in the US, the fights and protests that have continued. Look at The Trump! Didnt Saunders say democracy ain’t?….whatever is happening here is normal! Sishuwa, shulila kutali!!
A good compilation of what is in the press ..but it is not very clear from the reality on the ground if anybody would go and start a fight to settle an election dispute. The problem is that those who are complaining about all the issues raised here have failed to take a legal case to prove the allegations! The ECZ challenged opposition parties to prove their allegations on ballot printing but none did. The same applies to all other things reported in media and repeated here-they have never been proven. Couldn’t it be that those who are likely to loose are waging a psychological warfare and preparing masses for a possible election dispute once their loss is confirmed?
Does Zambia require a New Electoral System?
An electoral system is [merely] an administrative logistical process designed to ensure that an expressive choice by an entity is both registered and designated to a specific individual or organization without bias or any other form of administrative intimidatory malfeasance.
Zambia does not require ‘a new electoral system’ in that the fundamental civic electoral ontology of probity and trust is no different than that element of trust with the requisite administrative conduct which is required in other electoral jurisdictions whether in Canada, North America or in France, Europe.
The civic electoral administrative system ought not be suborned to a particular geographic or ethnic region. An electoral system to be effective must be deemed ‘trust worthy’ and be held to strict public administrative disclosure ensuring that the expressive choice has been expressed in the manner indicated by the elector.
A Zambian electoral systems may require localized ‘tweaking’ to ensure that the local Zambian electors are capable of registering their intent without fear or favour. Such tweaking may include pictographs for those people unable to read or write. Logistical extensions in terms of time may be built into the Zambian indigenous electoral process recognizing that transportation of the electoral materials do require time has local infrastructure may require additional time. Media and related public policy concerns must be addressed to ensure that the localized conditions are appropriately represented and addressed ensuring value neutral respect of the civic electoral administrative process.
This in no manner indicates that the essential electoral process is different or requires fundamental intrinsic modification as the essence of the process is no different. Choice registered–choice counted–choice expressed without any external bias or corrupt manner of practice designated to confer an unwarranted advantage to another.
In regions of political administrative fragility, greater concern must be addressed to the electoral system fundamentals ensuring that the fundamental civic electoral integrity is not compromised which ought to be an essential consideration for all electoral systems in the world.
The Fox – settle down! Your tone proves exactly what Shusuwa is writing about. This is not Zambia Reports or Zambia Watchdog where you insult people indiscriminately. Engage the article, not the writer. I am in Zambia and can also confirm everything he has written. It’s an accurate account, If anything, things are more terrible.
Moderator, comment number two has insults written in a Zambian language. This forum is for arguments not insults.
If you live in Zambia, you can see through this article as a reprint of the Post Newspaper articles that are so anti- Lungu they can do anything to arouse emotions and cause violence. The post’s desire is to control the govt in Zambia as they did Michael Sata – they planted all their mercenaries across the spectrum of govt including State House. What was the reward, the Post never paid taxes during Sata’s days. That is their problem.
Fact or fiction?????
Interesting article, though exaggerated. There are always accusations and counter accusations during time for elections in Zambia and these elections are not an exception.
Political cadres clash, unfortunately, and it is no new thing. Whether opposition or in power, it happens.
The situation currently is not as presented in the article, though it may have the potential to get there.
ECZ has always been accused during our elections even in the past, especially by opposition political parties. There is need to also look at the source of the information, (local print media) and how they relate with the government currently compared to the past.
All these allegations are unfounded. The opposition are just scared of their own shadows. If the Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ) was corrupt, how did PF manage to unseat the then ruling party (MMD) from power. These guys just want sympathy from the outside world. Let them put up a good fight if they are real men. PF was in opposition for over 10 years and each time they were beaten they would cry but never gave up until the Late President Micheal Sata won with a big margin and convincingly whereby one big province (Western Province) was not even counted and therefore he was declared winner. Shame upon you the agents of doom because no matter what happens your agenda will not come to pass. The problem is that some opposition leaders are running out of time as Presidents in their own Parties and therefore want to force their way to State House at all costs. The spirit of the good Lord will prevail over this country and those wishing doom for this country will not succeed in Jesus’ name. Whoever wishes doom upon this country shall not prosper because we believe in the living God and we are the apple of his eye. What patriotism are you trying to portray by wishing doom for this nation while you are pretending to be comfortable in a foreign country. If this nation is set on fire, don’t forget that you will also be affected because you have relatives here and they will not be spared. When hell break loose it does not only go for the people in Government but the whole nation will be on fire. So let us wish for the best for our nation. If it is God’s wish for your preferred Party to rule, not even the whole lot of Lucifer with his army of demons can stop it. We are not ready to suffer because of some selfish persons in their craving to go the State House at all cost… we refuse. My dear Sishuwa Sishuwa stop misleading the World and don’t be a cry baby.
First, let Air Commanders do their work. Security is a professional calling. Complaining about orderly conduct of air machines is misleading. Second, ECZ is responsible for elections, including choice of printer of ballots. It is wrong to choose a printer for ECZ and expect ECZ to follow blindly. The views of ECZ are consistent. Professional critics only accept election outcomes when win. Third, Constitutional Court is subject to parliamentary scrutiny. Ratification was achieved peacefully. Or are you envying parliamentarians? Fourth, if you catch foreign voters in the country, then report them to the police. Rumor mongering will not help.
It’s all fake.
I read the article and kept thinking all the things Sishuwa wrote about could have been true under Kaunda, mwanawasa, Banda and Sata. All opposition parties complain before the elections to get the sympathy of the international community. I find the article to be too exaggerated and anti-Lungu. If HH loses its not because of the ballots being printed in Dubai or ECZ has new judges. To me HH will lose because he is a rookie politician who to this day is in a check mate position over the VP position. His brand for “change and forward” has been diluted by defectors from PF, who have completely taken over UPND. So HH the man who was once in control of UPND is being controlled by the cartel of pf defectors. As such his political rookiness has began to show. Lungu is just now a better politician and he might win because he is the same man before and after Sata died. Lungu is his own man and his sticking to Inonge Wina as his running mate after all the pressure to dump, has once again proved that Lungu is not afraid to make difficult decisions, where as HH is indecisive and that’s what will cost him his 2016 presidency.
Excellent piece. To those who choose to ignore the warnings or want to suggest the author is not black enough, or African or Zambian enough, or domestically aware enough, or whatever else without addressing the issues he has raised:
It is a fact that the appointment of the judges to the highest court in the land the Constitutional Court (because the Constitution is supreme to all else in Zambia) was mired in controversy and was not supported by the Law Association. At the very least, the people of Zambia should be concerned that there is only one experienced senior judge (Chibomba) on this court (Mulenga is not very experienced as a judge, was only in the High Court and was controversial). And no legal practitioners with a track record in constitutional litigation and jurisprudence. Amateurs.
It is a fact that the ZPPA advised ECZ to cancel the Al Ghurairi contract for ballot printing, and that ECZ ignored this.
It is a fact that amendments to our electoral legislation were put to parliament in May, which was dissolved soon after but not before approving these amendments including the power of the President to dismiss commissioners. It is a fact that the President has appointed new ECZ commissioners who appear not to have any relevant expertise or experience. It is a clear that under these circumstances ECZ cannot be considered independent.
It is a fact that the Air Force Commander made the quoted comments (I watched him on ZNBC) and he thereby waded into the political arena which is a big no-no in our constitutional dispensation – Article 190(1) states that the Defence Force (which includes the Air Force) “shall (b) be non-partisan; (c) not further the interests or cause of a particular organisation; and (d) not act against a political interest or cause permitted in this Constitution or as prescribed.”
He also stepped into the domestic arena which is not within his purview as the Constitution clearly states in Article 192 (2) that the Defence Force shall (a) preserve and defend the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic (this means against external threats, nothing to do with internal or domestic issues); (b) foster harmony and understanding between the Zambia Army, Zambia Air Force, an auxiliary unit and members of society (all members not just PF members); and (c) co-operate with State organs and State institutions in times of public emergencies and national disasters (not elections).
So his utterances are unconstitutional and that should worry all of us, no matter our political party.
There are other facts: Lungu held a press conference at State House just before the campaigns kicked off, at which there was clapping and cheering whenever he spoke about the PF and “his” government and its supposed achievements; and he stated there that he was going to be re-elected –in my opinion, this is hardly statesmanlike behaviour from a Head of State addressing ALL the people of Zambia from their State House.
a good piece of writing but much of it is based on hear say and news paper reports. The voter’s roll was opened for verification and objections. How many of the political parties or concerned individuals have taken that opportunity no matter how short it was to raise objections to the alleged foreigners in the voter’s roll? The Electoral Commission cannot delete or remove names because of news paper reports. There are laid down rules, regulations and procedures of objecting to names on the voter’s roll. If political parties and individuals are indeed convinced of foreigners why did they raise such objections?
As an academic or a social interest writer, you will do well to check and write on facts and figures and not sing along with the unfounded rumours, hear say and news paper reports.
This is what happens when you have a President who is an independent man. Some people get extremely worried and would go to all lengths to fabricate lies. This article is not worth responding to.
One Zambia One Nation.
Whether based on newspaper reports or hearsay, the exact detail of what is being highlighted, here, is not the issue. Potential flare points that appear on prima-facie basis are what is of concern. It’s therefore misplaced to blame the writer for wishing the country ill when he highlights what’s purportedly wrong about the process as its panning out. It’s equally misplaced to suggest that just because allegations of wrongdoing regarding the electoral process were made in the past, and not proved, then any current suggestions of short comings should be glossed over. That’s flawed logic.
The author clearly states that such happenings preceding each election since 1991 keep testing Zambian’s patience and he rightfully observes that such testing cannot last forever as one day tipping point will be reached.
The real problem with tackling genuine issues to do with elections is the entrenched partisan positions that transcend what is in the common good. Refusal to compromise on assumed partisan positions is probably what the author left out in what will contribute to the coming election being disputed. It seems partisans are prepared to sacrifice reasonableness just to keep their ground. Sadly, such kind of an approach more often than not is what flames conflicts. And there should be no illusion that Zambia is perpetually designed to be peaceful and immune from strife. Other Africans, like Zambians, have had failure to agree on modalities of fair governance lead them down paths of conflict they never at any juncture wished on themselves. So Zambia is no exception. Hence, those that are tasked to ensure governance matters are dispensed fairly, with wider consensus, should ensure the process does just that.
A process riddled with callous flaws should not be tolerated or even excused. Ironing out those flaws and coming up with something fair should be the correct thing to do, should be the expected thing to do. It’s for this reason that the author is on a correct path by trying to bring out perceived wrongs with the process in the first place and we will be missing it altogether if we wholesomely repudiate what is being said in this article.
Zambia lately has been treading on dangerous grounds when it comes to electoral matters. When MMD unseated UNIP it was it was through a thin line because systems were deliberately made difficult for those in opposition. The defeat of UNIP was inevitable as masses grew tired of the state machinery. Rather than levelling the playing field for a plural well managed functioning democracy, MMD found itself in the shoes of UNIP by ensuring a tight grip on power and manipulate anything that can lead to the triumph of the opposition. The 1996 constitutional ammendment is one such example. The MMD made a model of persecution and humiliation of anything opposition. How many times was Michael Sata rubbished and shamed by MMD? Most of the laws they enacted had little to do with the upliftment of ordinary men and women in Matero, Mandevu, Chilenje, Choma, Chipata, Kasumbalesa etc from poverty because theirs was to manipulate and legisloot the dry. Because of their selective amnesia and proved that we Afrikans never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity by learning from history, nemesis caught up with them. The history of misrule, selfishness, self-enrichment, exclusivity, oppressive of dissidents was too much to bare hence MMD’s defeat was inevitable. PF came with good promises. Promises of reform in the enhancement of democracy and good-governance, reforms in levelling the political playing field for all electoral participants, respect of human rights, inclusivity, independence of institutions i.e judiciary, ECZ, media etc and today PF has become a shadow of its once promising vision for Zambia. For instance, PF has made ZNBC exclusively its mouth piece and propaganda machinery with few exceptions of weak oppositions who receive some little airtime. PF lead government has come to be known as a serial harasser of opposition figures on excuses rather than charges. Today PF is also engaged in politics of we defeated you and we will rule you for the next 30,40 or 100 years. Today there is so much shenanigans in the appointment of institutional chiefs. Foreigners are being recruited to part-take in Zambia election. Media e.g Post is threatened with closer because of its stances which in most cases are in disagreement with govt.
Independent, non-partisan institutions are deliberately being disarmed and swallowed up living their credibility hanging in the balance. The question is, is this the path ordinary Zambian men and women have chosen to the promised land? Its true the PF as the UNIP and MMD have done some things exceptionally well such as the road infrastructures and communication as it failed handsomely in some areas.
Zambian politicians across the board must stop beating war drums and ensure that elections are not a DO OR DIE affair and those in opposition prepare to accept results if they are genuinely beaten as those ruling to accept the outcomes if they are defeated and bare in mind that there is life after presidency or power. Let them start thinking of the next generation rather than the next election. A flawed disputed election result will put the nation up against each other. And this will be a tragedy of gigantic proportion to the peaceful people of Zambia. Politicians should always be careful with manipulation because after all its not about them but about the country and them is just to facilitate. Wishing you a happy election date Zambia 2016.
It’s not the voting that’s democracy; it’s the counting. ~Tom Stoppard, Jumpers
It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. Joseph
The purpose of an election is not to name the winner, it is to convince the losers that they lost. The winner rarely contests an election, the winner has little reason to investigate discrepancies. It is the looser that will always do this. Dan Wallach
On a lighter note, Elections are flawed and can’t be redeemed – it’s time to start choosing our representatives by lottery. Alexander Guerrero
It is a well articulated article but why is it every time the ruling party is headed for victory issues of electoral malpractice arise? PF in 2011 protested the printing of ballot papers in South Africa but what was the outcome? This trend of opposition political parties in Africa accusing the ruling parties of electoral malpractices should be assessed properly.
1. Most people are objecting to the sudden decision of printing ballots in an undemocratic country to facilitate a democratic process, 2.Most people are uncomfortable with a company that printed part of the ballots in the disputed elections in Uganda based on local stakeholders and the international community. 3. Most people are surprised at the sudden shift from South Africa to a far away undemocratic country, no reasons have been provided as to why there is a move from south Africa to a far away undemocratic country, leaving good references of the company business was done with in the past. 4. Zambia Printers was one of the company’s that bidded, most people are questioning why the local printer was not given preference for local empowerment purposes and especially that there were previous talks that the ballots would be printed locally, most people want to know what happened. 5.The voice of the local stakeholders has not be considered, and most people are questioning the contentious decision. 6. It will be very costly to monitor the process in a very far way place, most people question the cost benefit analysis, for monitoring to be of quality, observers need to be present to see all the ballots printed and inspect them, the packing of ballots, the transporting of ballots and delivering of ballots in the respective constituencies and polling centers, in short ballots should never leave the stakeholders eyes as part of quality control . 8. Most people are very uncomfortable with the news reports indicating that ECZ will be seeking immunity for what if quality delivery is the focus.9. International observers European Union in Zambia, African Union, The Commonwealth already in the country need to facilitate a pre election meeting way ahead of the elections with ECZ and local stakeholders to resolve this contentious issue to the satisfaction of all players and for election integrity purposes Zambia Elections Information Centre . Most people are tired of post election recommendations and want to see pre election/ pro active measures being taken way ahead of elections.What measures has ECZ put in place to ensure that all Local Stakeholders are confident of the electoral process from start to finish?
a. Enhanced stakeholder information.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82_daRtjjq0
“It is a well articulated article but why is it every time the ruling party is headed for victory issues of electoral malpractice arise? PF in 2011 protested the printing of ballot papers in South Africa but what was the outcome? This trend of opposition political parties in Africa accusing the ruling parties of electoral malpractices should be assessed properly.”
The reason why this appears so is that in most African democracies, the constitution of the electoral bodies is overseen or directed by ruling parties in exclusivity, with other parties playing no significant role. Therefore, when personnel in these bodies make decisions that are non-unanimous or appear partisan, it’s natural to assume that they are siding with the ruling party that recruited them in the first place.
1991 and 2011 won the confidence of local stakeholders.
1996 elections https://www.hrw.org/reports/1997/zambia/Zambia-01.htm and
http://www.nytimes.com/1996/11/21/world/president-is-re-elected-in-zambia-but-vote-is-called-tainted.html
2001 and 2006 elections http://gndhlovu.blogspot.com/2008/10/when-did-rigging-start.html
2008 election results https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Kh35NAziUw and http://archive.boston.com/news/world/africa/articles/2008/11/02/zambian_opposition_leader_charges_vote_rigging_in_tight_election/
2. What measures has ECZ put in place to ensure that all Local Stakeholders are confident of the electoral process from start to finish?
a. Enhanced stakeholder information.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82_daRtjjq0
AU what is your role? War is slowly breaking out in Zambia but you are just watching. The govt is killing, harrassing and brutalising its citizens using party cadres and state agents yet you watch untill millions are slaughtered before you act. Are you just on paper?
we are going backwards and we Zambians are killing ourselves,thats why i always say we are not peaceful,we just had a space of ignorance and silence so much that we are highly manipulated by our own and foreign whilst being quiet. He who is peaceful has guidelines on how to be peaceful and united,we are as quiet as Zimbabweans but now they have woken up but Zambia……..who knows,the other thing,international media and observers leave much to be desired,they only investigate and published the ruling parties happiness and process but never trying to investigate if the opposition parties concern and valid,this has left many of us wondering if these people must be relied on,whats the use of having an observer who has only one eye