African Arguments

Top Menu

  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Climate
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • Think African [Podcast]
    • #EndSARS
    • Into Africa [Podcast]
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Africa Science Focus [Podcast]
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Debating Ideas
  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

logo

African Arguments

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Climate
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • Think African [Podcast]
    • #EndSARS
    • Into Africa [Podcast]
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Africa Science Focus [Podcast]
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Debating Ideas
PoliticsRwanda
Home›African Arguments›Politics›Rwanda’s election outcome is already decided

Rwanda’s election outcome is already decided

By Filip Reyntjens
July 11, 2017
6080
0
President Paul Kagame has been in power since 1994. Credit: UN Photo/Mark Garten.

Only President Paul Kagame has a chance of winning the 2017 presidential election. And he could stay in power until 2034.

President Paul Kagame has been in power since 1994. Credit: UN Photo/Mark Garten.

President Paul Kagame has been in power since 1994. Credit: UN Photo/Mark Garten.

“More of a coronation than real contest.” That’s how the Kenyan daily The Standard characterised Rwanda’s presidential poll slated for 4 August. It sums up the reality well. In countries with competitive politics, elections are an important moment giving rise to debate and excitement. Not so in Rwanda.

Rwandans have become accustomed to polls where everything is settled in advance. This was the case before the genocide, when the country was officially a one-party state. And it has been the case since 1994, after which Rwanda became a de facto one-party state under the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF).

The current template for elections was set in 2003, when a constitutional referendum and the first post-genocide elections were held. In the run-up to these polls, the last genuine opposition party was banned, while the campaign was marred by arrests, disappearances and intimidation. An EU observer mission noted that, ironically, “political pluralism is more limited than during the transition period”.

The polls themselves were replete with allegations of fraud, manipulation of electoral lists, ballot-box stuffing, and flawed counting. Paul Kagame was declared the winner with 95% of the vote.

Similar dynamics were seen in the 2008 and 2013 parliamentary elections as well as the 2010 presidential poll. Opposition leaders were arrested and condemned to long prison sentences, while other critical voices were killed or went into exile.

In 2010, there were reports of local leaders going from door to door to collect voters’ cards and submitting their ballots for them. The Commonwealth observer mission at the time noted that “it was not possible to ascertain quite where, how and when the tabulation was completed”.

Kagame until 2034?

The presidential elections in 2010 were expected to be Kagame’s last. He was beginning his second constitutionally-mandated seven-year term and denied that he would seek re-election. He even claimed it would be a failure on his part not to find a replacement and warned that “those who seek a third term will seek a fourth and a fifth”.

Nevertheless, many remained sceptical that Kagame would step down, and in May 2013, his position became clearer when Justice Minister Tharcisse Karugarama was sacked shortly after insisting in an interview that Kagame would have to leave power in 2017 in accordance with the law.

By this time, a campaign had already started aimed at “convincing” the president to stay in office. In 2015, this culminated in 3.7 million Rwandans signing a petition – some under significant pressure – demanding that parliament enact constitutional changes that would allow Kagame to remain in power. It was claimed that this was a spontaneous action by the people, but it is unlikely such an operation could have been organised without the president’s knowledge and direction.

In subsequent “consultations” on the matter held throughout the country, MPs and senators claimed to have only found ten people – out of a population of 11 million – who opposed the initiative. Soon after, both houses unanimously approved a constitutional amendment to be put to a referendum.

The proposed revision called for maintaining the two-term limit and reducing term lengths from seven to five years. It also included a crucial provision allowing the incumbent to first run for an additional seven-year term, after which he would be eligible to bid for two more five-year terms. The changes effectively allow Kagame to stay in power until 2034, by which time he would have ruled Rwanda for 40 years.

While the issue of term limits has led to protests in many African countries, in Rwanda there was no debate or demonstrations around the December 2015 referendum. This was not surprising given that since the RPF took power, no demonstrations have taken place that were not organised by the regime itself. The amendment passed with 98.3% of the popular vote.

On 31 December 2015, President Kagame announced that he would run again, saying: “You requested me to lead this country again after 2017. Given the importance and consideration you attach to this, I can only accept”.

The candidates

Others also declared their intention to stand in 2017, including a handful of independents, but they have faced significant obstructions.

In May 2017, 35-year-old Diana Rwigara announced her candidacy, saying “people are tired, people are angry”. She had previously shown courage in criticising the government and human rights abuses. In the days following her announcement, doctored nude photographs of her circulated on social media.

Another aspirant, the Catholic prelate turned politician Thomas Nahimana, was denied access to Rwanda. Meanwhile, Gilbert Mwenedata, claimed that he was refused rooms by hotels in Kigali to hold a press conference to announce his plans.

The challenges facing independent candidates are dauntingly high to begin with. To be eligible, they must collect 600 signatures of support, including at least 12 from each of 30 districts. This may not seem much, but in an environment that does not tolerate criticism of the regime, it takes a lot of courage to reveal oneself to be an opposition supporter. Rwigara claimed that local leaders threatened her supporters as they tried to gather signatures.

Nevertheless, at least two hopefuls – Rwigara and Mwenedata – claimed to have met this requirement. But the National Electoral Commission (NEC) rejected their candidacies, claiming many of the signatures gathered were invalid. The NEC did not allow the candidates to see their lists to work out which names were disqualified, and several diplomats in Kigali expressed concern over the process.

In the end, only one independent hopeful – the little-known former journalist Philippe Mpayimana – made it onto the NEC’s final list.

The barriers for political parties are less onerous, and the Democratic Green Party’s (DGP) Frank Habineza was affirmed as the third and final presidential candidate. All other parties announced that they would not field nominees, but instead back Kagame.

No level playing field

As in previous elections in Rwanda, 2017’s opposition candidates have not faced an easy time or a level playing field in the run up to the polls.

While the RPF benefits from vast financial resources through its business ventures, other hopefuls were warned by the NEC against raising funds before being declared eligible. The electoral commission also announced in May that any social media messages by candidates or parties had to be submitted for vetting 48 hours prior to publication. Habineza called the decision “oppressive” and, after strong diplomatic protest, the measure was rescinded in early-June.

Opposition parties – in particular the non-registered FDU-Inkingi – have also seen their cadres arrested or disappeared. Amnesty International recently denounced the climate of fear surrounding the elections, saying: “Since the ruling Rwandan Patriotic Front took power 23 years ago, Rwandans have faced huge, and often deadly, obstacles to participating in public life and voicing criticism of government policy. The climate in which the upcoming elections take place is the culmination of years of repression.”

In these tense and oppressive circumstances, and given the widespread allegations of manipulation in Rwanda’s previous elections, it is not surprising that the head of the EU delegation in Kigali has said that “you would not lose any money if you bet on Mr Paul Kagame”.

Indeed, a 90% or higher victory for Kagame on 4 August seems inevitable in what will be coronation rather than election. All this is underscored by the latest Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) report in which Rwanda scored a mere two out of ten for “free and fair elections” and “effective power to govern”, and three for “association/assembly rights” and “freedom of expression”.

Previous Article

Kenya’s 2017 elections will be like none ...

Next Article

Kenya’s whirlwind weekend underscores election uncertainties

Filip Reyntjens

Filip Reyntjens is Emeritus Professor of Law and Politics at the University of Antwerp.

0 comments

  1. Aray Ado 11 July, 2017 at 12:12

    There is never democracy “ready to go” from the heavens! The house is never built on the bare sand. Using the word “never”, it’s looking to those who are leading in democracy in the world today. Africans have been trapped for a long time.
    Kagame Paul, like the other strong Heros of nations, has to build strong institutions of Rwanda, the real foundation any country ever needs. This is not a job over night for a country which has tasted a complete death. Heros like this man Kagame are rare to find in “colonized countries”.
    Democracy as western countries think in Africa, does not fit. It’s just a trap to keep Africa away from the realities. Africa need first, Africans who love their nations, and who understand how they can mobilize their people in order to together build the fruitful foundation of their country for the benefit of every single citizen.
    That’s what Kagame is doing now. It will take the time it needs until all citizens understand what is best for their nation. Let African builders do their job in peace.

  2. David 11 July, 2017 at 13:27

    The standards you’re using SIr are so outdated – a bit like the constitution writing of post independence Rwanda!

    It is clear the people and a greater majority are happy in Rwanda with what is going on. And when we feel unhappy we say so hear in Rwanda!

    Don’t cry foul just resign, reform and you will be a happy man!

    Best wishes!

  3. David 11 July, 2017 at 13:28

    Just a quick addition i used the term post independence – but i would rather use post – colonial Rwanda!

  4. jean 11 July, 2017 at 15:52

    do your homework before you type

  5. Amani Mahoro Peace 11 July, 2017 at 17:00

    If we all Rwandans love Paul Kagame 100% why Rwanda under Paul Kagame is leading in killing,emprisoning,exiling opposition political leaders? What is he afraid of? Why did he need to manipulate the constitution so that he becomes a king of Rwanda?

  6. Amani Mahoro Peace 11 July, 2017 at 17:08

    04/08/2017 in Rwanda is more of coronation than Democratic election. Paul Kagame does not believe in democracy,freedoms and independence.But in dictatorial totalitarianism, authocracy and authoritarianism

  7. Amani Mahoro Peace 11 July, 2017 at 17:14

    People in Rwanda are said to be “happy” with totalitarianism just like people in Zimbabwe are said to be happy and it was so with people in Zaire under Mobutu, in Irak of Sadam Hussein, In Libya with Kadhafi and in Uganda under Idi Amini Dada. Idi Amini too said all the Ugandans forced him to be their ruler for his whole life.

  8. Solange 12 July, 2017 at 01:46

    Filip Reyntjens is the author of the1978 Rwandan Constitution that institutionalized one party state,how does he preach lessons on democracy?

  9. Peter 12 July, 2017 at 06:45

    Is there any checklist of democracy that ought to be benchmarked by all nations across the globe? ……. rather each country has to craft it suited checklist applicable to it context. I think Mr Paul Kagame is working on that checklist.

  10. Theo 12 July, 2017 at 10:59

    Dear Filip Reyntjens,
    Thanks for your long text seeming like you only are recopying or gathering what have been said on us (Rwandans) since longtime. I simply assure you that we (Rwandans) are really happy and ready to vote for our Hero HE President Paul Kagame. Democracy, must be redefined and adapted dear! We know what is good and not good to us, come and we will teach you how loving your nation and its people; perhaps you will also learn a new course about patriotism. Don’t think Rwanda and its people like ones missing sight, we have eyes and we think about our beautiful country to hand over to our children and their children and theirs. Africans in summary, are now aware of their good and happiness. Regards

  11. VINCENT 12 July, 2017 at 22:01

    Let the gunners progress HE Paul Kagame. Keep going ahead.

  12. Atta 19 July, 2017 at 20:01

    There’s absolutely nothing surprising about President Kagame running for a next term. He’ll rule until he dies or is ousted (God forbid any violence, humanity is tired).

    So while we deal with the obvious (his long-term presence), we only implore His Excellency to keep pushing the development/economic growth agenda.

    He’s neither a savior nor the worst villain. We’ll take what we can get.

  13. Muwayimana kubaisi kigali 4 August, 2017 at 18:21

    let kagame get mercy on his heart because he rulling Rwandanese as rats. But how God will judge him because he is about to die very soon. Let us pray for Rwanda.

  14. rujumba 8 August, 2017 at 13:53

    Mr Theo,what do you understand by the term democracy,if you really know the kinder regime you living in at the moment……….

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Politics

    Human Rights and the African Union: Memory and Forgetting

  • Politics

    China Africa News: China a force for peace in the new Sudan?

  • President Yoweri Museveni has been in power in Uganda since 1986. Credit: Paul Kagame.
    PoliticsTop storyUganda

    Uganda’s regime is not the solution to insecurity. It’s part of the problem

Subscribe to our newsletter

Click here to subscribe to our free weekly newsletter and never miss a thing!

  • 81.7K+
    Followers

Find us on Facebook

Interactive Elections Map

Keep up to date with all the African elections.

Recent Posts

  • Why we’re taking the UK’s asylum seekers: Rwanda’s explanation
  • President Tinubu: An Ambivalent Record?
  • Nigeria’s curious voter turnout problem
  • Cyclone Freddy dumped six months’ rain in six days in Malawi
  • The loud part the IPCC said quietly

Editor’s Picks

CultureEditor's PicksSenegalTribute

Safi Faye: Farewell to a pioneering filmmaker

Senegalese filmmaker was the first African woman to make a commercial feature film, Kaddu Beykat, in 1975. Last Thursday, as filmmakers, curators and cinephiles were travelling to Ouagadougou for the largest ...
  • Rasha Mekky with her adopted son Mostafa. Credit: Rasha Mekky.

    “People said it’s haram”: Happy mums show reality of adoption in Egypt

    By Lara Reffat
    May 25, 2022
  • Truck drivers have continued to pour soil to fill up wetland areas in Nsambya, Kampala, Uganda. Credit: Nangayi Guyson.

    “The rich are untouchable”: Uganda’s struggles to protect its wetlands

    By Nangayi Guyson
    September 1, 2022
  • Nigeria: The cautionary tale of the fateful 2020 strike that never was

    By Immaculata Abba
    February 22, 2022
  • Has decolonisation become fetishised?

    Is it time to abandon decolonisation?

    By Anye-Nkwenti Nyamnjoh
    November 17, 2022

Brought to you by


Creative Commons

Creative Commons Licence
Articles on African Arguments are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
  • Cookies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© Copyright African Arguments 2020
By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our use of cookies.