African Arguments

Top Menu

  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Climate
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • Think African [Podcast]
    • #EndSARS
    • Into Africa [Podcast]
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Africa Science Focus [Podcast]
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Debating Ideas
  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

logo

African Arguments

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Climate
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • Think African [Podcast]
    • #EndSARS
    • Into Africa [Podcast]
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Africa Science Focus [Podcast]
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Debating Ideas
PoliticsSouth Sudan
Home›African Arguments›Politics›South Sudan’s other (more hopeful) peace process

South Sudan’s other (more hopeful) peace process

By David Deng
June 14, 2021
1982
3
Local Consultations in Northern Bahr El Ghazal in 2017. Credit: South Sudan National Dialogue.

In a country where people are so often seen as passive observers to events, the National Dialogue put ordinary citizens in control of their own destiny.

Local Consultations in Northern Bahr El Ghazal in 2017. Credit: South Sudan National Dialogue.

Local Consultations as part of the National Dialogue in northern Bahr El Ghazal in 2017. Credit: South Sudan National Dialogue.

Ever since the civil war first broke out in December 2013, South Sudan has effectively been locked in a never-ending peace process. In this time, the country has witnessed dozens of momentous handshakes and several supposed milestones on the path to ending a conflict that has killed hundreds of thousands, displaced 3.8 million people, and contributed to 8.3 million being in need of humanitarian assistance. Yet despite – or because of – these talks, the nation’s dysfunctional politics only seems to have become more entrenched.

The first peace agreement, signed in August 2015, lasted less than a year before the government and the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-in-Opposition (SPLM-IO) began fighting again. The second, signed in September 2018, has faced resistance and delays from the start. To its credit, fighting among its signatories has largely subsided. However, sporadic clashes continue against non-signatories, while violence – partly driven by political competition – is increasing at the subnational level.

South Sudan’s regionally-led peace processes, which have put the warring parties at the front and centre, have clearly left much to be desired. Yet interestingly, the country has also experimented with other initiatives. A recently concluded National Dialogue, which privileged the views of ordinary people, provides a potential alternative approach.

A rose growing from concrete?

The idea of a National Dialogue was first announced in December 2016 when South Sudan was arguably at its lowest point. Three years into the war, fighting had engulfed the entire country again and the UN was warning of a potential genocide and impending famine. The 2015 peace agreement was mostly defunct by this point, though it continued to be endorsed by neighbouring governments, the so-called Troika (US, UK and Norway), the European Union, African Union and UN.

It was in this context that President Salva Kiir announced the intention to launch a National Dialogue to “save the country from disintegration and usher in a new era of peace, stability and prosperity”. The initiative was to have three stages. The first would be grassroots consultations. Next would follow regional conferences. And this would all culminate in a national conference. The process would be overseen by a leadership team of politically-experienced individuals, a secretariat comprised of several people including some from think tanks and research institutions, and a steering committee of nearly one hundred members. The president was originally going to be the “patron” of the process but stepped back early on.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the announcement of the National Dialogue split public opinion. Its supporters saw it as a much-needed alternative to a regional peace process that seemed to be fixated on accommodating elite interests and appeared incapable of addressing the conflict’s root causes. They saw hope in a homegrown, bottom-up approach to peace-making that would centre the views and aspirations of ordinary South Sudanese.

On the other hand, sceptics argued that any meaningful dialogue would not be possible until some minimum amount of security and stability had been established. Some went further in labelling it a “monologue” after key opposition parties refused to participate in what they saw as a bad faith attempt by the government to undermine the existing peace process.

An unmet demand to be heard

In the end, neither of these views really captured the essence of what followed. However flawed the process might have been, once the space was created for people to voice their views, they participated with a candour that surprised even members of the National Dialogue itself.

While the regional mediation focused on power sharing and transitional security arrangements, participants in the National Dialogue offered more grounded views of the conflict. Groups in Western Bahr-el-Ghazal, for example, raised concerns with administrative divisions, social unrest and the killing of peaceful demonstrators shortly after independence that they cited as an ongoing source of tension in the area. Participants in Upper Nile discussed the role that disputes over land and the drawing of administrative boundaries played in fomenting violence between Padang Dinka and Shilluk communities. These were the sorts of issues the wider peace talks had neither made space to examine nor promised to address.

Like that process, the National Dialogue also faced challenges of funding gaps, logistical constraints, and the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. It dragged on for over three years and many participants began to lose hope that the views they shared would ever see the light of day. It was only in November 2020 that its final activity was convened as 518 delegates from all South Sudan’s 80 counties gathered in Juba for two weeks of discussions.

From the start, it was clear that the long-awaited national conference would be politically turbulent. Citing the views gathered from the grassroots consultations, the leadership team put forwards some bold resolutions such as that the country should adopt “a mixed federal system [that gives] full political, administrative, and financial powers to the states” and that land should be “owned by the communities and…managed by various levels of government in accordance with the law”.

The co-chairs’ most controversial position, however, was in placing the blame for the conflict squarely at the feet of the ruling party and calling on President Kiir and his five vice-presidents to stand aside in the elections scheduled for December 2022. They recommended that the UN, AU and regional bloc IGAD assume responsibility for the poll’s conduct.

This stance caused a furore among elites in Juba. Several members of the steering committee and secretariat disavowed the recommendation and said it did not represent the views of the process as a whole.

From passive to active

The leadership of the National Dialogue has now formally handed over its cover letter and reports to the president, who has issued assurances that its resolutions will be implemented. There is ample room for scepticism this will happen or that the process will succeed where the regional peace process appears to be failing. But either way, the National Dialogue provides important lessons about the power of participatory approaches to peace in South Sudan.

In a country where people are so often portrayed as passive observers to external interventions – from conflicts started by elites, to humanitarian relief provided by international organisations, to peace processes run by regional powerbrokers – the idea of putting ordinary citizens in control of their own destiny represents a paradigm shift. As the peace process appears to be faltering again and conflict continues in parts of the country, more innovative approaches to peacebuilding such as these are long overdue.


 

Previous Article

HH: “Zambians want change…We don’t count how ...

Next Article

Will Benin be next to see Islamist ...

David Deng

David Deng is a human rights lawyer and researcher who has worked in South Sudan since 2008. He is co-author of a report entitled ‘Citizen Perspectives on the National Dialogue in South Sudan’.

3 comments

  1. Michael Shokunbi 14 June, 2021 at 19:55

    The black mentality still at bay. After fighting to gain independence, it is time to struggle to fight ourselves. Mismanagement woes and miseries continue. What was the essence of struggle for independence?. What is the meaning of independence. Dependence on feudal lords, self-centered people opportunist predators and hawks who later exacerbate our heavy hearts, trample upon our humanity and stretches our miseries and further pauperize our lives.

    “South Sudan’s regionally-led peace processes, which have put the warring parties at the front and centre, have clearly left much to be desired. Yet interestingly, the country has also experimented with other initiatives. A recently concluded National Dialogue, which privileged the views of ordinary people, provides a potential alternative approach.

    Which unending peace process?. It has been moribund exercises since independence. They have continue to batter assault and brutalize our collective intelligence.

    Therefore, the question. Is the black man not better off under colonial governments?.

  2. Maurice R Clark 21 June, 2021 at 23:50

    Sustainable progress seldom results from giant leaps, but most often derives from the slow tedious process of dampening spot fires, suturing leaky arteries, and encouraging individual participation.

    Attempts to impose an over-arching national rule fail if the historic regional cultures and conflicts are unresolved. A national governance from afar is locally seen as just one more assault on dominant cultural values and leadership. Merit will not overcome cultural history. Passage of time allowing small steps to create acceptance is far more preferable to a strong-armed violent insistence on the transition.

    The national policy imposed by Marshall Tito in Yugoslavia on Christian Serbs and Muslim Croats was to assassinate any individual attacking the other culture. If retaliation ensued, he ordered the deaths of the assailants entire family. Without mercy or exception! Soon that reality stopped the tribalist conflicts over generational grudges.

    Short of the murderous models of fascist Germany, dictatorial Stalinist USSR, or Pol Pot in communist Cambodia, democracy takes time. Historically, lasting peace comes only slowly with national acknowledgment and recognition of regional cultural realities.

    To impose a “Nation” model under other circumstances simply imposes one conqueror for another. And it is doomed to the very generational tribalism that pre-existed the “Nationaist” model. If you think not, when sixty one South Sudanese tribal nations were no longer battling the common enemy in Khartoum, they reverted to historic tribal conflicts.

    Until Juba is no longer seen as the current enemy from afar, the reality of the “Nation” of South Sudan will be the dream of a few and the enemy of many.

    Papa Maury Clark

  3. South Sudan’s other (more hopeful) peace process | NEWS EUROPE 12 August, 2021 at 08:55

    […] Source link : https://africanarguments.org/2021/06/south-sudans-other-more-hopeful-peace-process/ Author : David Deng Publish date : 2021-06-14 08:35:50 Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source. Tags: hopefulpeaceprocessSouthSudans Previous Post […]

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Is President Weah's focus on the former government just a distraction? Credit: jbdodane.
    LiberiaPolitics

    Missing billions, losing patience: Liberia probe targets former officials

  • PoliticsSudan

    Hassan al-Turabi: Sudan’s democrat turned authoritarian (1932-2016)

  • Politics

    Mali ‘Islamisation’ tackled: The Other Ansar Dine, Popular Islam, and Religious Tolerance – Brian J. Peterson

Subscribe to our newsletter

Click here to subscribe to our free weekly newsletter and never miss a thing!

  • 81.7K+
    Followers

Find us on Facebook

Interactive Elections Map

Keep up to date with all the African elections.

Recent Posts

  • Afrobeats: The birth of Afro-Adura
  • Sudan: How the generals disappeared the people on the way to the economy
  • Is a Peaceful Somalia Possible? Alternatives to Total War on Al-Shabaab
  • “Economic bondage”: E Africa farmers worry over what GMOs might mean
  • The unexpected success of Somalia’s new fight against Al Shabaab

Editor’s Picks

Editor's PicksEthiopiaPolitics

Ethiopia’s forgotten minority: Who will be the voice for Karrayyu?

Zoom out from Tigray and there are many more groups facing abuses who are rarely talked about by the media or advocacy groups. On 2 February 2022, the Ethiopian Human ...
  • Africa coronavirus covid A woman in Mali wearing a mask. Credit: Photo: World Bank / Ousmane Traore.

    Africans don’t just live to die. A response to the New York Times.

    By Mamka Anyona
    January 8, 2021
  • #EndSARS: Not just a name or statistic. The tragedy of Rinji Bala

    By Zainab Onuh-Yahaya
    November 5, 2020
  • If you believe you are a citizen of the world…

    By James Wan
    November 6, 2019
  • “Nothing will fall from the sky”: Algeria’s Revolution marches on – Photo Essay

    By Sabri Benalycherif
    December 18, 2019

Brought to you by


Creative Commons

Creative Commons Licence
Articles on African Arguments are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
  • Cookies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© Copyright African Arguments 2020
By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our use of cookies.