African Arguments

Top Menu

  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
    • Climate crisis
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • #EndSARS
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Podcast
    • Into Africa Podcast
    • Africa Science Focus Podcast
    • Think African Podcast
  • Debating Ideas
  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

logo

African Arguments

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
    • Climate crisis
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • #EndSARS
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Podcast
    • Into Africa Podcast
    • Africa Science Focus Podcast
    • Think African Podcast
  • Debating Ideas
Politics
Home›African Arguments›Politics›Dueling Over Darfur: The Newsweek Debate

Dueling Over Darfur: The Newsweek Debate

By Alex de Waal
November 8, 2007
1725
0

Dear John,

I appreciate the points that you make in your second response—you are coming much closer to the reflective discussion on the "learning curve" of activism that I had hoped for.

Let me take up two points.

The first is the activist influence. The truth is that in any situation such as the war and atrocities in Darfur, and the trajectory and success or failure of a peace process, the main culprits are the warring parties. In Darfur’s case, the government was (and is) vastly more powerful than the rebels and so must take the lion’s share of responsibility. I hope I made it clear that the activists have at best a marginal responsibility—just as the humanitarians make a difference at the margin.

I have explained some of the reasons why I think the Darfur campaign raised unrealistic expectations among Darfurians. I think the name "Save Darfur" also raises unrealistic expectations among activists. You and I cannot save Darfur—only the Sudanese, and especially the Darfurians, can do that. We can certainly help them or hinder them—and many of the practical activities of, for example, GI-Net, are undoubtedly very positive and helpful.

We need to be concerned with the whole array of groups and individuals taking public stands on Darfur. This includes members of Congress and aspiring presidential candidates. One of the main reasons they take these positions is because there is an emerging mass constituency on Darfur—and potentially and hopefully on other human rights issues too. So we should examine the process whereby (for example) a presidential candidate advocates a no-fly zone or direct military action. If the exercise of creating a mass constituency for preventing mass atrocities is to be successful—and I very much hope it is—then its leaders and shapers need to attend to how it influences political leaders.

And I am seriously concerned that the bellicose rhetoric of some prominent American political figures is making the problem harder to solve.

The second is the nature of the government in Khartoum. Is the current chaos in Darfur what the government wanted and planned—as you contend—or was it the product of a confused and ultimately counterproductive counterinsurgency, as I argue? You don’t say it here, but you come close to describing the Sudan government as both very strong and very cunning. George Kennan famously wrote in critique of the early Cold War mindset, "The enemy must always be a center. He must always be totally evil." In your more analytical moments you recognize that this doesn’t apply to Sudan. But your advocacy often leans perilously close to branding Khartoum’s rulers as unreconstructed evil. It’s a very short step from that to seeing the only possible responses as either regime change or forcible occupation of Darfur (variants of the Kosovo option proposed by Susan Rice and Anthony Lake last year). I am encouraged by your disavowal of a no-fly zone. But many people involved in Sudan still believe that regime change is your real agenda—I think you have an obligation to disabuse them, loud and clear, if that is not the case.

I prefer to see the Sudan government as weak and sometimes incoherent, and to see the militia strategy and the mass killing in Darfur as a product of its internal weaknesses. That’s not an exoneration. If we understand we can still condemn. But this analysis leads to different policy responses. I am all for putting pressure on the Sudan government, but I believe that it must be applied strategically. This hasn’t been the case to date. If international—and especially U.S.—policies towards Sudan contribute to the ascendancy of hard-liners in Khartoum who believe that there’s no point in making concessions, because the U.S. will simply take them and demand more, then we find ourselves in a more difficult position.

Will we succeed in bringing peace to Darfur and democracy and stability to Sudan as a whole? I don’t know. My greatest fear is that we have missed by far the best opportunities for success in both Darfur and the country as a whole—that we have passed the tipping point at which international action ceases to have any traction on events in Sudan.

In hope for real progress towards real solutions,

Alex

Previous Article

Listening to Sudanese Voices on Darfur

Next Article

Alex de Waal to appear on Frontline, ...

mm

Alex de Waal

Alex de Waal is Research Professor and Executive Director of the World Peace Foundation at The Fletcher School, Tufts University. He was the founding editor of the African Arguments book series. He is the author of The Real Politics of the Horn of Africa: Money, War and the Business of Power.

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Politics

    Thoughts on ‘A Civil Society Deferred,’ – By Peter Woodward

  • Politics

    DRC: Assessing the performance of MONUSCO’s Force Intervention Brigade – By Christoph Vogel

  • Politics

    The Double Edge of Celebrity Interest in Darfur

Subscribe to our newsletter

Click here to subscribe to our free weekly newsletter and never miss a thing!

  • 81.7K+
    Followers

Find us on Facebook

Interactive Elections Map

Keep up to date with all the African elections.

Recent Posts

  • Oligarchs, Oil and Obi-dients: The battle for the soul of Nigeria
  • Of cobblers, colonialism, and choices
  • Blackness, Pan-African Consciousness and Women’s Political Organising through the Magazine AWA
  • “People want to be rich overnight”: Nigeria logging abounds despite ban
  • The unaccountability of Liberia’s polluting miners

Editor’s Picks

Climate crisisEconomyEditor's PicksSociety

Why the world needs an African ecofeminist future

Orthodox economic models have failed us all, but women across Africa are resisting them and coming up with visionary alternatives. We need an “African ecofeminist future”. And by we, I ...
  • Typical coping strategies such as a nomadic lifestyle are inadequate to handle what is potentially the worst food crisis in Somalia's recent past. Credit: UNDP Somalia.

    Somalia faces worst humanitarian crisis in recent history

    By Mukesh Kapila
    June 23, 2022
  • African climate protesters at COP26 in Glasgow, UK.

    2022 is Africa’s year to lead the world on climate change

    By Mohamed Adow
    January 12, 2022
  • President John Pombe Magufuli of Tanzania died on 17 March 2021, aged 61. Credit: Paul Kagame. death

    Dear John, I forgive you

    By Elsie Eyakuze
    March 23, 2021
  • kitenge in Kenya

    Can a Chinese import ever be authentically African?

    By April Zhu
    August 21, 2019

Brought to you by


Creative Commons

Creative Commons Licence
Articles on African Arguments are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
  • Cookies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • en English
    am Amharicar Arabicny Chichewazh-CN Chinese (Simplified)en Englishfr Frenchde Germanha Hausait Italianpt Portuguesest Sesothosn Shonaes Spanishsw Swahilixh Xhosayo Yorubazu Zulu
© Copyright African Arguments 2020
By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our use of cookies.
en English
am Amharicar Arabicny Chichewazh-CN Chinese (Simplified)en Englishfr Frenchde Germanha Hausait Italianpt Portuguesest Sesothosn Shonaes Spanishsw Swahilixh Xhosayo Yorubazu Zulu