African Arguments

Top Menu

  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Climate
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • Think African [Podcast]
    • #EndSARS
    • Into Africa [Podcast]
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Africa Science Focus [Podcast]
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Debating Ideas
  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

logo

African Arguments

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Climate
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • Think African [Podcast]
    • #EndSARS
    • Into Africa [Podcast]
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Africa Science Focus [Podcast]
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Debating Ideas
Politics
Home›African Arguments›Politics›Protecting Darfurian Civilians, the ICC and the NCP

Protecting Darfurian Civilians, the ICC and the NCP

By Hafiz Mohammed
December 22, 2008
1594
0

Human rights violations against civilians in Darfur have continued to be the focus of many reports, including the UN Human Rights Special Repporteur, the UN Under-Secretary for Humanitarian Affairs and most recently the report of the Darfur Consortium. These reports come almost four years after the main two reports into the crimes committed in Darfur since 2003, which were the International Commission of Inquiry set up by the UN Security Council, and the Sudanese Government’s Commission of Inquiry led by Mawlana Dafa Allah Al Haj Yousif. All those reports come to much the same conclusion. They document cases of mass killing of civilians, forced displacement and rape. We now have reports of abduction and forced labour, which is not surprising as these abuses occurred in every other theatre of war in Sudan over the last twenty years. Now, almost five years since the eruption of the conflict in Darfur, the same violations still continue. Over these years the UN Security Council has issued many Resolutions including the referral of Darfur to the ICC and the authorisation of the deployment of UN African Union Mission in Darfur (UNAMID) but these steps have not ended the violations.

The most common and serious type of ongoing violation is the rape of women, especially when they go out searching for firewood. Recently, according to reports from some humanitarian organisations, there has been an increase in rape cases, mainly because women have to leave the IDP camps for longer times not only looking for firewood but trying to top up the food ration which been cut due to the shortage of rations provided by the World Food Program due to shortage of funds and the interruption in supplies because of attacks on convoys.

Five year after the international community declared its intention to stop the atrocities in Darfur there is no end in sight to the abuses. The trend of those attacks has changed. Most of the perpetrators are the same Arab Militias (Janjaweed) but now they have been given official status and turned into so-called Border Guards and other paramilitaries and central reserve police. They are in military uniform and enjoy total impunity, even some of the cases which were reported to the local police were not pursued because the police have no authority over the violators because they are military forces.

The Sudan Government policy is to continue denying any such allegations. They have not taken any serious step to halt the abuses, and have not acted on the demand made by the UN Security Council more than four years ago that they should disarm the Janjaweed militia, or on the solemn promise in the 2006 Darfur Peace Agreement that they should control the militia. Today, some of the militia are now acting for their own interest and not even listening to any orders from Khartoum. They are heavily armed and the government army cannot challenge them.

Since July this year the Government and specially the National Congress Party priority has sharply changed. The issue of the ICC Chief Prosecutor’s endeavour to indict President Omer al Bashir has become the only agenda in their calendar. It is preoccupying their thoughts and driving their actions. It is the most serious issue which has faced the ruling circle in their nineteen years in power. Although the ruling circle has a very strong survival instinct, the ICC issue is testing this to the limit. It has changed their instinct for common survival into individual concern for self-preservation. Every single one of them is looking back to see whether he has any link with the violations committed in the Darfur conflict and what responsibility he may have which could take him to The Hague. Some of the NCP leaders are even contemplating handing over President Bashir to save the Islamic movement. This movement recently elected Mr Ali Osman Taha to become its Secretary General, the post which used to be occupied by Dr Hassan al Turabi before the 1999 split.

The fear that is animating the ruling circle is that if they don’t act now they do not know where the ICC process will stop. They do not know who is next on Ocampo’s list, and they think at least to hand over President Bashir will buy them some time to rethink their strategy.

However, Bashir is strengthened compared to the past. The Interim National Constitution of July 2005 gives him more power as President than he ever enjoyed before. He has rallied his brothers and some of his extended family around him. Recently one of his brothers made it clear that Bashir will never be handed over to the ICC and they will consider him as a martyr in the same way that they lost one of their brothers in the war, and are still ready to sacrifice another one for the cause. Bashir himself made it clear last week when he was addressing some farmers in Sennar State that he wants to die an honourable death, and he will not hand over anyone to the ICC, not even a cat. In that rally Bashir predicted that the ICC will issue the arrest warrant against him. If that happens the NCP will be left with very few options. They cannot repudiate their international relations. They will not be able to change their agreements with the UN and will not able to ask the UN and humanitarian organisations to leave Sudan, as the Government will not be able to feed millions of IDPs and cannot afford to let them starve of death.

One of the options the Government will consider is to crack down on the press and the civil society activists. They have already started doing this, when they arrested and mistreated three activists accusing them of collaborating with the ICC. However, I do not believe that the Government can afford to go back to the dark days of the early nineties, when they had many ghost houses and imprisoned all those who dared to criticize them. The Jihadist agenda of those days has faded. Things have changed and there are not many Jihadists out there ready to die for the cause and the promise of marrying virgins in Paradise. There is no return to the revolutionary fervour of those days, but the opportunity of regressing into nasty authoritarianism is always there. The main victim of the crackdown will be the democratisation process.

The NCP is not ready to compromise in its grip on power at any cost. This is one hundred percent clear. The NCP recently refused to accept an SPLM proposal to change the National Security and Intelligence Act, as the current Act contradicts the Interim Constitution, and needs to be reformed before there can be any genuine democracy and free elections. The census results have been delayed and will now be released next month, but most probably the SPLM will refuse to recognise it and that will delay the National Election which is supposed to be held before July 2009, according to the CPA,

This week the NCP has decided to turn the Sudanese People’s Initiative into a permanent body, the Sudanese People’s Forum. This is a mis-step. Unfortunately the SPI/F does not represent all Sudanese people. Many of its critics believe it is dominated by the NCP. It has not got representation for many major Darfurian activists and it is not recognised by the armed movements.

The current deployment of the Sudan Armed Forces in South Kordofan contradicts the CPA , and as one senior member of SPLM has said, South Kordofan could well be the cause of a new war between the north and the south. The NCP argument that JEM is planning to move its war to South Kordofan is not supported by any evidence on the ground. Tribal leaders in Tagali area of eastern South Kordofan region have recently written to the UN Mission in Sudan to complain about the Sudanese army moves.

There are many ticking bombs threatening peace in Sudan. Only God knows where the current growing crisis will end.

Previous Article

Protection and Livelihoods: Important New Report

Next Article

Bashir Protects Sudan’s Capital with Water Trenches ...

Hafiz Mohammed

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Politics

    Who are Somalia’s “˜al-Shabab?’ – By Christopher Anzalone

  • Politics

    Africa and the War on Drugs: a new book and online debate from African Arguments

  • #EndSARSEditor's PicksNigeriaPolitics

    What is the legacy of #EndSARS?

Subscribe to our newsletter

Click here to subscribe to our free weekly newsletter and never miss a thing!

  • 81.7K+
    Followers

Find us on Facebook

Interactive Elections Map

Keep up to date with all the African elections.

Recent Posts

  • Back to the future in the Great Lakes: Who’s backing the M23?
  • Why we’re taking the UK’s asylum seekers: Rwanda’s explanation
  • President Tinubu: An Ambivalent Record?
  • Nigeria’s curious voter turnout problem
  • Cyclone Freddy dumped six months’ rain in six days in Malawi

Editor’s Picks

CultureEditor's PicksNigeria

Nollywood has been mediocre for long enough

Nigeria has the talent and appetite for ambitious and original films, but it needs to cultivate a homegrown cinema culture to make this a reality. Since its inception, Nollywood has ...
  • Nigeria: The cautionary tale of the fateful 2020 strike that never was

    By Immaculata Abba
    February 22, 2022
  • Doctors perform obstetric fistula surgery in Eldoret, Kenya. Credit: Heidi Breeze-Harris/One By One.

    The solvable health issue that kills more than malaria, AIDS and TB

    By Desmond Jumbam
    May 24, 2022
  • A member of MONUSCO, one of the forces in the eastern DRC where the M23 is operating, clears Unexploded Ordnance (UXO). Credit: UN Photo/Sylvain Liechti.

    The return of M23: Is there a way out for the DRC?

    By Stephanie Wolters
    November 1, 2022
  • Unpacking the geopolitics of Uganda’s anti-gay bill

    By Kristof Titeca
    March 10, 2023

Brought to you by


Creative Commons

Creative Commons Licence
Articles on African Arguments are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
  • Cookies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© Copyright African Arguments 2020
By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our use of cookies.