African Arguments

Top Menu

  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
    • Climate crisis
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • #EndSARS
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Podcast
    • Into Africa Podcast
    • Africa Science Focus Podcast
    • Think African Podcast
  • Debating Ideas
  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

logo

African Arguments

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
    • Climate crisis
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • #EndSARS
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Podcast
    • Into Africa Podcast
    • Africa Science Focus Podcast
    • Think African Podcast
  • Debating Ideas
Politics
Home›African Arguments›Politics›Darfur: Why Doha Must Succeed

Darfur: Why Doha Must Succeed

By Jibreel Mohammed
August 9, 2010
1447
0

Recent months have witnessed the phenomenon of a growing chorus of criticisms of the Doha peace process. Carping is to be expected during any long drawn out peace negotiations and without any doubt the JCM Minister Bassole will have to answer many questions about his choice of strategy and tactics when the process finally concludes. His public relations leaves much to be desired as it is.

Notwithstanding legitimate questions about the questions of who is represented in Doha and the significance of proceeding with drafting substantive texts in the absence of Abdul Wahid al-Nour and Dr. Khalil Ibrahim, it is as clear as daylight that Doha is the only legitimate peace process for Darfur under these current circumstances. As someone who has contributed to these columns in the past with little good to say about the Doha process, the reader is entitled to know why I am forwarding this opinion.

To begin with, the Doha process is recognized by the United Nations, the African Union, the League of Arab States and all the major world powers without exception. Libya has stood against it and Egypt has signaled its discontent but no-one can argue that these rivalries among Arab states are anything other than petty political posturing. No other venue for peace talks can command the same legitimacy. Qatar has invested very substantially in providing diplomatic and financial support to the talks with a level of consistency and commitment that is commendabl and indeed without parallel. This stands in contrast to the half-hearted or on-off commitments of other countries that put their names forward as alternative hosts of the peace talks. Only Qatar will stay the course of the negotiations whatever the frustrations and twists and turns and this has become clear to all over the last months. Only Qatar will follow through with the peace dividend that all the people of Darfur deserve. If Doha fails then the Darfur peace process will return to forum shopping which could take months if not years before a new venue is agreed.

The GoS talks about “domesticating” the peace process for Darfur and holding talks inside Darfur. This is just old wine in new bottles and nothing more than a Darfuri version of the old “peace from within” programme which was a divide-and-rule strategy, nothing more nor less. The failed DPA planned a Darfur-Darfur Dialogue and Consultation (DDDC) which never got off the ground and which can be revived later to deal with conflicts among and between communities. In today’s situation of deteriorating security the chance that the leaders of the Armed Movements will accept assurances of safety from UNAMID, let alone Khartoum, and come to Darfur to attend a “domesticated” peace process are precisely nil.

Last year the international community put a deadline for a peace agreement to be reached before the elections. That deadline came and went. Now they are talking about a deadline of before the referendum. That might just be possible if the negotiators redouble their efforts with an injection of goodwill and international expertise and guidance when the talks restart after the end of Ramadhan. If any new process is started then the chances of any agreement being reached in time will shrink to a vanishingly small percentage.

The crisis at Kalma camp that has unfolded over the last two weeks shows exactly why Doha can not be allowed to fail. The anti-Doha group that controls Kalma and professes loyalty to Abdul Wahid could not tolerate the presence of the delegates who had been to Doha and returned with the news that the peace process was making real progress on the issues that are close to the hearts of the IDPs themselves. The extra judicial executions carried out allegedly by the camp sheikhs who subsequently took refuge with the UNAMID community police are a shameless attempt at intimidation, and were tragically neither the first nor the last attempt to stall the peace process in favour of the personal agenda of the spoiler in chief. Unfortunately UNAMID has only confused the situation by shifting the issue from pro- versus anti-peace forces to human rights guarantees for the accused persons which has served to embolden the spoilers. That victory for the anti-peace group is ephemeral and will in short order be overridden by the overwhelming desire of the ordinary people for peace.

The ordinary people of Darfur crave peace and will not tolerate the failure of the next peace agreement. What comes from Doha may not be the perfect peace but the Doha peace agreement will be better than the hopeless life of indignity and despair that is the daily reality for millions. Those who stand against it will be shown up as opportunists and egotists who do not care for their people and the people will punish them accordingly. The Qataris have displayed commitment beyond the call of duty and backed it up with resources including the promise of a substantial peace dividend in the form of infrastructure and social development. The expense and difficulty of bringing hundreds of civil society leaders to Doha is not to be minimized and it is safe to say that the Darfuris have greater confidence and trust in the Qataris than in many of their own so-called leaders who have delivered nothing. Doha is our best chance if not our last chance and we must take it with both hands.

Previous Article

Darfur: Data for Violent Deaths – July

Next Article

Darfur: Why is the Doha Process Failing? ...

Jibreel Mohammed

0 comments

  1. Tag Elkhazin 5 September, 2010 at 18:31

    Dear Gibreel

    It is a healthy sign that several of us are now addressing issues relating to “Process”. Let us keep it up.

    On Doha being the only “Legitimate Peace Process” one wonders who has the moral grounds to bestow that classification? if the UN/AU/LAS and countless others opt for Doha and the “Primary Stakeholders” reject it, it vanishes. It becomes null and void. A corner stone in Mediation is the confidence and acceptance of the belligerents in the Process and its management team. Do we have that in Doha?

    GOS New Strategy is not calling for the “Domestication” of negotiations; on the contrary, its acknowledges Doha for that but after pre-emptying it from priority to an accessory to their Strategy.

    Political agreements are not meant, in themselves, to address manifestations; of which violence and human suffering are two painful symptoms. They are meant to address “root causes” of the conflict if the agreements are to be durable. They are meant to set the conducive conditions for Post Conflcit Reconstruction and lasting Peace Dividends.

    Human suffering is normally addressed in Humanitarian Frameworks such as the Operation Lifeline Sudan. Regrettably this is very week in the N’Djamena Protocol of April 8th, 2004.

    Darfur Society (termed Civil Society) does not have and can not have mechanisms and power organs to implement a political agreement that has power sharing and security arrangemnts. This is the domain of the Government of the Day and the Armed Movements. They are to carry the needs and non-negotiables of the Community with them.

    Tag

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Politics

    Sudan’s Islamic Movement: Mosaic Democracy, a New Concept

  • Politics

    The Central Africa Forum

  • #EndSARSNigeriaPolitics

    #EndSARS fake news: Is Instagram equipped to police the internet? 

Subscribe to our newsletter

Click here to subscribe to our free weekly newsletter and never miss a thing!

  • 81.7K+
    Followers

Find us on Facebook

Interactive Elections Map

Keep up to date with all the African elections.

Recent Posts

  • Crisis in Lasanod: Border Disputes, Escalating Insecurity and the Future of Somaliland
  • Oligarchs, Oil and Obi-dients: The battle for the soul of Nigeria
  • Of cobblers, colonialism, and choices
  • Blackness, Pan-African Consciousness and Women’s Political Organising through the Magazine AWA
  • “People want to be rich overnight”: Nigeria logging abounds despite ban

Editor’s Picks

Editor's PicksFellowsNigeriaSociety

“Only Ukrainians, not Blacks”: Fleeing African students face racism

Those fleeing Russia’s invasion speak of discrimination by both officials and fellow refugees and of a lack of support from their governments. Initially, Wasiu Sidiq, a 20-year old student studying ...
  • Ethnic voting Africa

    Colonialists didn’t fail to root out Africa’s tribal politics. They created it.

    By Kamau Muiga
    August 6, 2019
  • Cameroon torture: In 2017, some detainees filmed a video from inside Cameroon's notorious prison known as The Bunker in Yaounde.

    Inside Cameroon’s Bunker: “Different guys had different torture techniques”

    By Emmanuel Freudenthal
    May 7, 2019
  • ongwen wives uganda LRA

    “We need to stick together”: Meet the family made up of Ongwen’s ex-wives

    By John Okot
    June 15, 2021
  • If you believe you are a citizen of the world…

    By James Wan
    November 6, 2019

Brought to you by


Creative Commons

Creative Commons Licence
Articles on African Arguments are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
  • Cookies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • en English
    am Amharicar Arabicny Chichewazh-CN Chinese (Simplified)en Englishfr Frenchde Germanha Hausait Italianpt Portuguesest Sesothosn Shonaes Spanishsw Swahilixh Xhosayo Yorubazu Zulu
© Copyright African Arguments 2020
By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our use of cookies.
en English
am Amharicar Arabicny Chichewazh-CN Chinese (Simplified)en Englishfr Frenchde Germanha Hausait Italianpt Portuguesest Sesothosn Shonaes Spanishsw Swahilixh Xhosayo Yorubazu Zulu