African Arguments

Top Menu

  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
    • Climate crisis
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • #EndSARS
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Podcast
    • Into Africa Podcast
    • Africa Science Focus Podcast
    • Think African Podcast
  • Debating Ideas
  • About Us
    • Our philosophy
  • Write for us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • RSS feed
  • Donate
  • Fellowship

logo

African Arguments

  • Home
  • Country
    • Central
      • Cameroon
      • Central African Republic
      • Chad
      • Congo-Brazzaville
      • Congo-Kinshasa
      • Equatorial Guinea
      • Gabon
    • East
      • Burundi
      • Comoros
      • Dijbouti
      • Eritrea
      • Ethiopia
      • Kenya
      • Rwanda
      • Seychelles
      • Somalia
      • Somaliland
      • South Sudan
      • Sudan
      • Tanzania
      • Uganda
      • Red Sea
    • North
      • Algeria
      • Egypt
      • Libya
      • Morocco
      • Tunisia
      • Western Sahara
    • Southern
      • Angola
      • Botswana
      • eSwatini
      • Lesotho
      • Madagascar
      • Malawi
      • Mauritius
      • Mozambique
      • Namibia
      • South Africa
      • Zambia
      • Zimbabwe
    • West
      • Benin
      • Burkina Faso
      • Cape Verde
      • Côte d’Ivoire
      • The Gambia
      • Ghana
      • Guinea
      • Guinea Bissau
      • Liberia
      • Mali
      • Mauritania
      • Niger
      • Nigeria
      • São Tomé and Príncipe
      • Senegal
      • Sierra Leone
      • Togo
  • Politics
    • Elections Map
  • Economy
  • Society
    • Climate crisis
  • Culture
  • Specials
    • From the fellows
    • Radical Activism in Africa
    • On Food Security & COVID19
    • #EndSARS
    • Covid-19
    • Travelling While African
    • From the wit-hole countries…
    • Living in Translation
    • Red Sea
    • Beautiful Game
  • Podcast
    • Into Africa Podcast
    • Africa Science Focus Podcast
    • Think African Podcast
  • Debating Ideas
Politics
Home›African Arguments›Politics›Another Rwandan Human Rights Organisation Bites the Dust – By Anonymous

Another Rwandan Human Rights Organisation Bites the Dust – By Anonymous

By Uncategorised
November 25, 2013
1949
1

LIPRODHORConcurrent with a general preoccupation to restrict and restrain freedom of speech within Rwanda, the Government has successfully brought another human rights organisation within the country to its knees. Throughout 2013, the Rwandan League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (known as LIPRODHOR) has been progressively enveloped within the government’s sphere of control to the extent that its capacity for any form of meaningful and autonomous critical expression is almost non-existent.

As various human rights organisations have described, much of this can be attributed to a change in the Board of Directors which occurred in July 2013. Despite the organisation’s constitution making clear that the Board be elected at the General Assembly, which is usually held in December, with a quorum consisting of two-thirds of the organisation’s members, a meeting was held in July which dismissed the previous board and elected a definitively pro-RPF contingent in their place. Many of those working for LIPRODHOR were not invited, and it is alleged that fewer than half the number required for quorum were in attendance. Nonetheless, and perhaps unsurprisingly, the regulatory body within the Rwandan Governance Board approved the election process as entirely legitimate.

Although the previous board is challenging this decision within the courts, there is little expectation that this will be decided in an expedient or favourable fashion. For one, the case is unusual; officially, it involves only members of LIPRODHOR, and on paper there were no procedural irregularities. Even a cursory glance, however, raises some crucially unaccounted for aspects. The meeting in July, for example, required the mobilisation, transportation and accommodation of almost fifty members of the organisation at no small expense. As there is no record of any LIPRODHOR funds being used for this process, as would be the case for their regular Annual General Meetings, this undoubtedly suggests that another organ was involved in the process. The court’s dismissal of that aspect will likely be another classic case of juridical spin-doctoring.

In the meantime, this controversy has impacted upon donors’ willingness to fund the organisation’s activities, resulting in the cancellation of several contracts. With the contract for the Universal Periodic Review having been lost, constituting a major withdrawal of funds, this leaves the organisation’s staff in a dilemma: work without being paid, or leave. The latter comes with the certainty that once the remaining critical voices within the organisation have left, the transformation to wolf in sheep’s closing will continue unimpeded. New sources of funding will spontaneously appear which allow LIPRODHOR’s work to continue, but the focus will shift away from direct indictments of the Rwandan government’s human rights record to tokenistic defenses of prisoner, disabled and access to property rights. In essence, human rights abuses will become blamed on the inadequacies of the system rather than the intentional, systematised will of the government.

And that is what is most concerning about this current case. Whereas in the past LIPRODHOR has had assets frozen and the organisation’s doors temporarily closed, it has been able to mobilise internal resistance against the government’s infringement. International human rights organisations have been able to challenge these tangible actions, and LIPRODHOR has eventually managed to regroup and continue its work. Now the organisation is increasingly “˜rotten at the core’, however, it suggests that the current strategy of government takeover is near-on irreversible.

So as not to end on too depressing an analysis, one member of the organisation made the following clear. Though they see bilateral government pressure to improve human rights within the country as ineffective and even dangerous, causing retribution to those sources the Rwandan government considers to have contributed towards it, the watchful eye of international civil society provides some source of ongoing reassurance. It communicates a clear message that the government cannot act with total impunity, which is reassuring to individual and organisation alike. This is not to say that it is stopping many of the vast numbers of infringements being experienced, but rather that it is keeping open that small window of opportunity and possibility which ensures that those violations can at least continue to be challenged.

Comments will be moderated before approval.

Previous Article

Why Are South Africa’s “˜Born Frees’ Scaring ...

Next Article

Oil drilling plan stirs hornets’ nest in ...

Uncategorised

1 comment

  1. Monte McMurchy 29 November, 2013 at 15:06

    This comment will focus mostly on what I refer to as “massively institutionalized international human rights law.” By this I mean the particular form of practicing human rights that espouses both a highly legal and highly institutional international form. It should be evident that this is only one of the ways in which one might think about the potential of human rights, but also that it is a particularly influential one in this current age. As a prime example of this massive institutionalization, I will be particularly interested in the fate and role of the European Convention (ECHR) and Court (ECtHR) of Human Rights, the one that is most frequently heralded as the model towards others should converge, that has been emulated by other regional systems and may yet provide the blueprint for a universal human rights system (in the form, for example, of the increasingly discussed project for an international human rights court). What the focus on the ECtHR foregrounds is the important of adjudication in processes of international human rights law development. In that respect, although my thinking has been heavily influenced by “International Human Rights Movement: Part of the Problem?” David Kennedy’s striking critique, I am less interested in the “human rights movement” than with international human rights institutions as part of the super-structure of international law.

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • At the 2018 Alliance for a Green Revolution Forum. Credit: Paul Kagame.
    EconomySociety

    A food-secure Africa needs contribution from all

  • PoliticsSomalia

    Can the credibility of Somalia’s indirect elections be salvaged?

  • At a Black Lives Matter protest. Credit: Jason Hargrove. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
    Society

    An open letter from prominent Africans: We cannot remain silent

Subscribe to our newsletter

Click here to subscribe to our free weekly newsletter and never miss a thing!

  • 81.7K+
    Followers

Find us on Facebook

Interactive Elections Map

Keep up to date with all the African elections.

Recent Posts

  • Oligarchs, Oil and Obi-dients: The battle for the soul of Nigeria
  • Of cobblers, colonialism, and choices
  • Blackness, Pan-African Consciousness and Women’s Political Organising through the Magazine AWA
  • “People want to be rich overnight”: Nigeria logging abounds despite ban
  • The unaccountability of Liberia’s polluting miners

Editor’s Picks

Editor's PicksEgyptRadical Activism in Africa

Egypt’s sexual revolutionaries tackling the tyranny within

Meet the women and queer people sparking a revolution against the patriarchy through Arabic-language online platforms and sex toys. This article is part of the Radical Activism in Africa special series, guest ...
  • Sudan Middle East influence

    Cash and contradictions: On the limits of Middle Eastern influence in Sudan

    By Alex de Waal
    August 1, 2019
  • What is the legacy of #EndSARS?

    By Zainab Onuh-Yahaya
    November 23, 2021
  • media diversity

    How white are the newsrooms working on Africa? We asked them.

    By Emmanuel Freudenthal
    August 12, 2020
  • Nigeria's former president, Olusegun Obasanjo continues to wield significant influence in Nigeria. Credit: Friends of Europe.

    An interview with Olusegun Obasanjo: Up close and a little too personal

    By James Wan
    September 28, 2017

Brought to you by


Creative Commons

Creative Commons Licence
Articles on African Arguments are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
  • Cookies
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • en English
    am Amharicar Arabicny Chichewazh-CN Chinese (Simplified)en Englishfr Frenchde Germanha Hausait Italianpt Portuguesest Sesothosn Shonaes Spanishsw Swahilixh Xhosayo Yorubazu Zulu
© Copyright African Arguments 2020
By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our use of cookies.
en English
am Amharicar Arabicny Chichewazh-CN Chinese (Simplified)en Englishfr Frenchde Germanha Hausait Italianpt Portuguesest Sesothosn Shonaes Spanishsw Swahilixh Xhosayo Yorubazu Zulu