Why Are South Africa’s “˜Born Frees’ Scaring Zuma? – By Keith Somerville

World Economic Forum on Africa 2009

Is Jacob Zuma scared of his country’s young people?

South African President Jacob Zuma has reacted angrily to the use of the term “˜born frees’ for the generation of young South Africa who will get their first chance to vote in next year’s elections.  Speaking at a voter registration drive in Atteridgeville, west of Pretoria, on 8th November he said that the term was propaganda and makes young people out to be idiots.  Quite how he came to this conclusion that being “˜born free’ was being equated with being idiot, is not clear, but his nervousness about this generation is clear.  Zuma’s retort is not just redolent of the ANC’s sensitivity to real or implied criticism; it is also a measure of the concern felt by the ANC about the voting intentions of the more than a million new voters potentially about to appear on the electoral roll.

“˜Born free’ refers to the generation born in 1994 or afterwards, following the collapse of the apartheid system. Just over 600,000 South Africans were born in the year that the ANC was voted into office, with a similar number in the following two years.  Not all will register to vote, but there could be half million new voters casting their ballots for the first time when the next general election takes place in 2014.  This is over 5% of the electorate.  The ANC is concerned that many of this generation will not register to vote, but is perhaps even more worried that those who do might not simply vote for the ANC as a matter of course, not being of the “˜struggle’ or “˜lost’ generations of the 1980s and the early 1990s, or what could be called the grand apartheid generation that preceded it.  For those generations the ANC is still the party of struggle and liberation, even if its physical role was limited and it had to integrate and subordinate the UDF, COSATU and other domestic “˜struggle’ organisations once it was unbanned in 1990.

Zuma is extremely sensitive to criticism and negative media coverage and the ANC is constantly on the offensive against perceived criticism or slights – just witness the vituperation from the ANC’s spokespersons over art students who recently produced T-shirts mocking the President.  The term “˜born free’ has been in use for some time, but the ANC has become increasingly sensitive to its use, thus Zuma’s tirade and the attempt to portray it as an insult to youths.  There’s a simple reason for his anger:  The term implies a generation that didn’t know apartheid, for whom it will be harder for the ANC to portray itself as the natural party of government and its now inflated account of its dominant role in fighting for black South Africans during the struggle.

The identification of a new generation that may not automatically feel respect for ANC leaders, awareness of the sacrifices of those who died or were imprisoned or a sense of owing something to the ANC, is worrying for the party.  There is ample recent literature, such as Roger Southall’s book, Liberation Movements in power: Party and State in Southern Africa, which addresses the mentality of “˜struggle’ organisations and their assumption of a “˜right to rule’ derived from their role in fighting minority rule, rather than earning that right through delivering good governance and better living standards.

The ANC is under pressure because it is not delivering jobs to young South Africans, is riven by factions and pressed, though not yet too strongly, by new movements and parties.  One of those new movements, the Economic Freedom Fighters of Julius Malema, may prove to be a vocal, rather dangerous and potentially damaging flash in the pan, but at the moment it scares some in the ANC who fear it could attract young voters who did not take part in the struggle or experience apartheid.  They fear that unemployed or disadvantaged young South Africans will warm to the extravagant promises and violent criticisms made by Malema, as the radical, bling prophet of a better life for the unemployed and marginalised young.

Zuma addressed this, without mentioning the EFF by name, when he told his Atteridgeville audience that, “There are a lot of people who make empty promises. You need to know there is an organisation that fought for freedom.”  Just how much the “˜freedom’ selling point will work with a generation born free but condemned to poor service delivery, rampant corruption in government and the prospects of 50% plus unemployment, remains to be seen.

The generational change factor has been important across Africa over the last 25 years, as generations which did not know colonialism but grew up with authoritarian governments, corruption and declining living standards showed that they had scant respect for the old parties and leaders who tried to bolster their appeal using the “˜liberator’ theme.  In an interview in Lusaka in 1991, the then President Kenneth Kaunda of Zambia was honest enough to admit to me that he was having to agree to multiparty politics and to campaign hard for the youth vote as a generation had grown up which had not known colonialism and had no great respect for those who struggled for independence. He admitted that it would be hard to harness their support. And he was right. They voted him out of office later in the year.

The ANC may not be about to lose office, but it wants the lion’s share of the born free vote as it seeks, as Zuma has said repeatedly, 75% of the vote and so the ability to totally dominate parliament, free to amend the constitution and rule without hindrance.  This ambition will, however, be hard to achieve.  The EFF is unlikely to seriously challenge for power, but could leech away crucial votes. Mamphela Ramphele’s Agang party might also take some of the votes of educated, middle class voters (old and young) sick of the corrupt and increasingly violent and intolerant image of the ANC, and the DA could increase its share of the vote while retaining power in the Western Cape, to the ANC’s immense irritation. This could all eat away at the size of the ANC majority, though without threatening its hold on power.  But a lessening of support now, especially if COSATU remains split and is unable to play the same mobilization role among voters it did in previous elections,  could demonstrate that the ANC is not THE party of government.

The death of Nelson Mandela may also have an effect in the future – when he dies a milestone will have been passed and people who might have voted for the ANC out of loyalty and respect for him could fall away.  Next year’s vote may not topple the ANC but it could be the start of a process of electoral decline to match its evident moral decline.

As the older generations die off, the ANC will have to capture the new voters – first of all ensuring they register and then ensuring they vote and vote for the ANC.  In the 2011 municipal elections, 23.65m South Africans were registered to vote, but another five million were eligible but not registered.  Only 57.64% actually voted. In 2009, 77.3% voted in the national elections – down by 8% from the previous national vote.  Many young people, as happens across the world, are apathetic about elections and formal politics as they see their problems of unemployment and poor prospects not seriously addressed by the elected government.  South African political commentator Justice Malala has said that, “One of the biggest challenges for our maturing democracy is apathy”.  The ANC is struggling to overcome apathy in the born free generation and is worried that it could turn to hostility, encouraged by the rabble-rousing speeches of Malema, seeking to harness youth frustrations and anger.

The former UDF and ANC activist, who played his role in the struggle and as President Thabo Mbeki’s right-hand man in government, Frank Chikane, has said that dealing with the born frees is the ANC’s biggest challenge, pointing to the 51% unemployment rate among 15 to 24 year olds.  He warned recently that, “If the ANC doesn’t change, it is going to lose that generation. And if it loses that generation, it will lose an election – you can be sure about that.”  That is why Zuma is fulminating about the “˜born free generation’ – the generation that could use its freedom to reject him and his increasingly out of touch movement.

Keith Somerville is a Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of Commonwealth Studies; teaches in the School of Politics and International Relations at the University of Kent; and edits the Africa  – News and Analysis  website (www.africajournalismtheworld.com).

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

4 thoughts on “Why Are South Africa’s “˜Born Frees’ Scaring Zuma? – By Keith Somerville

  1. Honoured members, the National Development Plan 2030 indicates that ‘ given the escalating costs of services in both the public and private sectors and the high proportion of the GDP that goes to health service funding, it is essential to create a culture of using evidence to inform planning, resource allocation and clinical practice.’ To achieve this goal and in implementing the National Health Research Summit of 2011 the National Health Scholars Programme has been established with an aim to produce 1 000 PhD graduates over the next 10 years. Already 13 PhD scholars have been funded for this financial year. In the near future, these PhD Scholars will become the new generation of health researchers, and also contribute to clinical teaching and training and health service delivery.

  2. The results of these elections have unequivocally debunked the myth spread by many that young people do not have faith in the Mass Democratic Movement and the African National Congress. In many campuses, SASCO and the ANC Youth League, contested and defeated those who posture as having the monopoly of the youth vote, particularly the middle class youth vote. This notion has been rejected by the children of Mandela, sending a clear message that young people are secure in the knowledge that the true representatives of their aspirations is the Congress Movement. We trust that never again, should others seek to speak on their behalf, calling them “born-free” with the intention to isolate them from the struggles of our people and our collective history.

  3. Maybe they will see that the ANC government is useless in what they do and what they say they will do and only look to self enrich themselves… they don’t care what happens to South Africa and it people.

  4. The NP then spearheaded the reform process that paved the way for the postapartheid political system (see Constitutional Change, this ch.). The NP also sought to project a new party image. In 1990 it launched a nationwide recruitment drive for new members of all races, appointed a new management council and new regional secretaries to oversee its reforms, and established new training programs for party leaders, to emphasize racial tolerance. These changes broadened the party’s parliamentary support. In May 1991, five MPs deserted the Labour Party, which since 1965 had represented the interests of the coloured community, to join the NP delegation. Their view that the new NP best represented the interests of their community was rejected by most of the Labour Party, but the NP continued to seek the support of the roughly 1.6 million voters in the coloured community.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.